Philippine Law Updates Podcast Por Amicus Juris Production arte de portada

Philippine Law Updates

Philippine Law Updates

De: Amicus Juris Production
Escúchala gratis

Acerca de esta escucha

Philippine Law Updates is a podcast about relevant Philippine laws and jurisprudence compiled by Amicus Juris Production, a group of volunteer lawyers and law students based in Iloilo City and the Ilonggo Volunteer Lawyers (IVL).

© 2025 Philippine Law Updates Ciencias Sociales Crímenes Reales
Episodios
  • PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, VS. CYNTHIA GO MORENO, PEPITO A. MAGUILIMOTAN, NONELA N. VILLEGAS, MARILYN P. FLORDELIZA, AND GERTRUDES D. ABABON, ACCUSED. AUGUSTUS CAESAR L. MORENO AND EVANGELINE D. MANIGOS, ACCUSED-APPELLANTS. [ G.R. No.

    PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, VS. CYNTHIA GO MORENO, PEPITO A. MAGUILIMOTAN, NONELA N. VILLEGAS, MARILYN P. FLORDELIZA, AND GERTRUDES D. ABABON, ACCUSED. AUGUSTUS CAESAR L. MORENO AND EVANGELINE D. MANIGOS, ACCUSED-APPELLANTS. [ G.R. No.
    May 21 2025

    The right to speedy disposition of cases is provided for in Section 16, Article III, of the 1987 Constitution. In determining whether the right to speedy disposition of cases has been violated, the following guidelines in this Supreme Court decision must be considered.
    Más Menos
    5 m
  • ROSELYN AGACID Y DEJANIOVS. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, et. al. [ G.R. No. 242133, April 16, 2024 ]

    ROSELYN AGACID Y DEJANIOVS. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, et. al. [ G.R. No. 242133, April 16, 2024 ]
    May 19 2025

    Republic Act No. 9262 or the Anti-Violence Against Women and Their Children Act of 2004 also applies even if the perpetrator is a woman, so long as the victim is a woman.
    Más Menos
    5 m
  • PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, VS. LUCKY ENRIQUEZ Y CASIPI, ACCUSED-APPELLANT. [ G.R. No. 264473, August 07, 2024 ]

    PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, VS. LUCKY ENRIQUEZ Y CASIPI, ACCUSED-APPELLANT. [ G.R. No. 264473, August 07, 2024 ]
    Apr 20 2025

    The police officers were obliged to give the appellant notice, show to her their authority, and demand that they be allowed entry. They may only break open any outer or inner door or window of a house to execute the search warrant if, after such notice and demand, such officers are refused entry to the place of directed search. This is known as the "knock and announce" principle which is embodied in Anglo-American Law. The method of entry of an officer into a dwelling and the presence or absence of such notice are as important considerations in assessing whether subsequent entry to search and/or arrest is constitutionally reasonable.
    Más Menos
    10 m
adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_T1_webcro805_stickypopup
Todavía no hay opiniones