![PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, VS. LUCKY ENRIQUEZ Y CASIPI, ACCUSED-APPELLANT. [ G.R. No. 264473, August 07, 2024 ] Podcast Por arte de portada](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/51de5aHHxSL._SL500_.jpg)
PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, VS. LUCKY ENRIQUEZ Y CASIPI, ACCUSED-APPELLANT. [ G.R. No. 264473, August 07, 2024 ]
No se pudo agregar al carrito
Solo puedes tener X títulos en el carrito para realizar el pago.
Add to Cart failed.
Por favor prueba de nuevo más tarde
Error al Agregar a Lista de Deseos.
Por favor prueba de nuevo más tarde
Error al eliminar de la lista de deseos.
Por favor prueba de nuevo más tarde
Error al añadir a tu biblioteca
Por favor intenta de nuevo
Error al seguir el podcast
Intenta nuevamente
Error al dejar de seguir el podcast
Intenta nuevamente
-
Narrado por:
-
De:
Acerca de esta escucha
The police officers were obliged to give the appellant notice, show to her their authority, and demand that they be allowed entry. They may only break open any outer or inner door or window of a house to execute the search warrant if, after such notice and demand, such officers are refused entry to the place of directed search. This is known as the "knock and announce" principle which is embodied in Anglo-American Law. The method of entry of an officer into a dwelling and the presence or absence of such notice are as important considerations in assessing whether subsequent entry to search and/or arrest is constitutionally reasonable.
adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_T1_webcro805_stickypopup
Todavía no hay opiniones