Episodios

  • BROKE: BYU to Texas Tech, Every Big 12 School Owes $20 MILLION IMMEDIATELY, Destroying Sport Revenue

    BROKE: BYU to Texas Tech, Every Big 12 School Owes $20 MILLION IMMEDIATELY, Destroying Sport Revenue
    Jun 9 2025
    The landmark House v. NCAA antitrust settlement, which received final approval from a federal judge in late May 2025, is indeed set to impose a significant financial burden on all Division I universities, including BYU and others, primarily through a new model of direct athlete compensation. Here's how it will cost universities an estimated $20 million annually and why it's a challenge, particularly for schools outside the wealthiest tier:The $20.5 Million Annual Cap for Direct Athlete Payments:New Revenue Sharing: Starting on July 1, 2025, the settlement allows (and for Power Four conferences, effectively requires) Division I schools to directly share revenue with their athletes. This marks a revolutionary departure from the NCAA's long-standing amateurism model.Initial Cap: The initial annual cap for this direct athlete compensation is set at approximately $20.5 million per school for the 2025-2026 academic year. This cap is expected to increase by at least 4% annually over the 10-year term of the settlement.Across All Sports: This $20.5 million is intended to cover compensation across all varsity sports within the athletic department, not just revenue-generating sports like football and men's basketball.Funding Breakdown (General Expectation): While individual schools have discretion on how to allocate the funds, the general expectation is that the vast majority will go to the highest-revenue sports. Projections suggest:Around 75% ($15 million) will go to football players.Approximately 15% ($3 million) will go to men's basketball players.Around 5% ($1 million) to women's basketball players.The remaining 5% ($1 million) to all other sports.How This Hurts All Universities, Including BYU:Massive New Expense: This $20.5 million represents a brand-new, mandatory expense that athletic departments must now absorb. For many schools, even those in Power Four conferences, this is a significant and sudden increase to their annual operating budget.Budgetary Strain: Athletic departments, while generating substantial revenue, also have considerable expenses (coaching salaries, facilities, travel, scholarships, administrative costs). Adding $20.5 million per year for direct athlete pay will strain budgets, potentially requiring cuts elsewhere, increased fundraising, or even larger subsidies from the university's general fund (which often comes from student tuition or state appropriations).Maintaining Competitiveness: The "cost of doing business" in high-level college athletics has just dramatically increased. To remain competitive in recruiting and player retention, schools feel compelled to pay close to that $20.5 million cap. Failure to do so could put them at a disadvantage against rival programs that can afford to pay more.Impact on Non-Revenue Sports: While the majority of the money is expected to go to football and men's basketball, the requirement to allocate some funds to other sports, coupled with the overall budget strain, raises concerns for non-revenue generating sports. Some speculate that schools might have to cut certain sports or reduce opportunities (e.g., walk-on programs, which will also be impacted by new roster limits) to manage costs, although the settlement did include a compromise to "grandfather in" roster limits for current athletes.Funding the Back Pay: In addition to the annual direct payments to current athletes, universities (through their conferences) also contribute to the $2.8 billion in back pay for athletes who competed between 2016 and 2024. This payment is distributed over 10 years, further impacting conference revenue distributions to schools. The Power Four conferences are responsible for 24% of these damages, while the NCAA covers 40% and other conferences cover the rest through reduced distributions.Impact on BYU and Similar Schools:BYU, as a newly full-share member of the Big 12 (receiving around $50 million annually from media rights starting 2025-2026), is in a relatively strong position compared to some. However, it's still a significant financial challenge:Affordability Question: Even with their increased Big 12 revenue, the question remains if BYU can comfortably afford the full $20.5 million without impacting other areas. BYU has historically run a very lean, debt-free athletic department without direct Church funding for athletics. The increased Big 12 revenue in 2023-2024 (partial share) and 2025-2026 (full share) helps, but that $20.5 million is a new expense.In conclusion, the House v. NCAA settlement represents a fundamental shift in college sports, directly putting a $20.5 million annual bill on universities for direct athlete compensation. While necessary from a legal standpoint to avoid even larger liabilities, it creates a new and substantial financial pressure on all athletic departments, forcing them to re-evaluate budgets, revenue streams, and competitive strategies in this unprecedented era.Support Us By Supporting Our Sponsors!GametimeToday's episode...
    Más Menos
    28 m
  • NEW: Experts Give HONEST Update On Jake Retzlaff's BYU Future After Sexual Assault Allegation

    NEW: Experts Give HONEST Update On Jake Retzlaff's BYU Future After Sexual Assault Allegation
    Jun 6 2025
    The debate over the College Football Playoff (CFP) format has become a battleground reflecting the power dynamics in college athletics, with the SEC initially pushing for a model that would significantly favor it and the Big Ten over the Big 12 and ACC.The SEC's Initial Position: The "4-4-2-2-1" ModelFor some time, a prominent proposal, often associated with the SEC and Big Ten's interests, was the "4-4-2-2-1" model (or sometimes "4-4-2-2-1-3" for a 16-team playoff). This model would essentially grant: Four automatic bids each to the SEC and Big Ten.Two automatic bids each to the ACC and Big 12.One automatic bid to the highest-ranked Group of Five conference champion.The remaining slots would be at-large bids.Why the SEC (and Big Ten) Pushed for This:Guaranteed Dominance: This model would cement the SEC's position at the top of college football, ensuring a significant presence in the playoff every year regardless of individual team performance bumps. It provides a built-in advantage in terms of playoff access.Revenue Maximization: More playoff teams directly translates to more revenue for the conference and its member schools. Given the massive new media rights deals and the impending direct athlete compensation model, maximizing CFP revenue is paramount.Reducing Selection Committee "Bias": There's a feeling within the SEC (and Big Ten) that the selection committee has, at times, overlooked strong teams from their conferences due to perceived inconsistencies in the "eye test" or a desire for broader representation. Guaranteeing more automatic bids would lessen the committee's power to exclude their top-tier teams.Strength of Conference Argument: SEC Commissioner Greg Sankey often argues that the SEC's strength of schedule is unmatched, and therefore, more of their teams deserve to be in the playoff even with more losses than teams from other conferences. Guaranteeing spots reflects this belief. He's also pointed to how the SEC gets numerous bids in other sports like basketball (e.g., 14 teams in March Madness), suggesting a similar recognition should apply to football.The Impact on the Big 12 and ACC (and Their Pushback):This "4-4-2-2-1" model would explicitly place the Big 12 and ACC in a subordinate position regarding CFP access. They would receive half the guaranteed bids of the SEC and Big Ten.Limited Access: Even if the Big 12 has a strong year with three or four highly competitive teams, only two would be guaranteed spots. The remaining teams would have to fight for very limited at-large bids, often against other highly-ranked SEC/Big Ten teams that didn't win their conference but still have top-tier resumes.Perceived "Second Class" Status: This structural disadvantage would reinforce a "second-tier" perception for the Big 12 and ACC within the Power Four, potentially impacting recruiting, media narratives, and long-term financial health."Earn it on the Field": Both Big 12 Commissioner Brett Yormark and ACC Commissioner Jim Phillips have vehemently opposed this model. Yormark, in particular, has pushed for the "5+11" model (five automatic qualifiers for the highest-ranked conference champions, 11 at-large bids), arguing that it's "fair" and promotes the idea of teams "earning it on the field" rather than receiving "gimmes" based on conference affiliation.Recent Developments and Shifting Sands:Interestingly, recent reports from the SEC's spring meetings indicate a potential shift in the SEC's stance. While the Big Ten remains bullish on the "4-4-2-2-1" model, the SEC, after discussions with its coaches (many of whom reportedly prefer the 5+11 model), is showing more openness to the "5+11" format. Some within the SEC even believe that the "5+11" model could ultimately lead to more SEC teams in the playoff in some years than the 4-AQ model, especially if the conference moves to a nine-game schedule, making their strength of schedule even more compelling for at-large bids.Regardless of the final decision, the SEC's initial push for double the automatic qualifiers of the Big 12 and ACC highlights its strategic goal: to maximize its presence and revenue in the sport's most lucrative postseason, even if it meant creating a distinct tier system within the top conferences.Support Us By Supporting Our Sponsors!Monarch MoneyTake control of your finances with Monarch Money. Use code LOCKEDONCOLLEGE at monarchmoney.com for 50% off your first year.FanDuelRight now, new customers can get TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS in BONUS BETS when your first FIVE DOLLAR BET WINS! Download the app or head to FANDUEL.COM to get started. Bet with FanDuel—Official Partner of the NBA.FANDUEL DISCLAIMER: 21+ in select states. First online real money wager only. Bonus issued as nonwithdrawable free bets that expires in 14 days. Restrictions apply. See terms at sportsbook.fanduel.com. Gambling Problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER or visit FanDuel.com/RG (CO, IA, MD, MI, NJ, PA, IL, VA, WV), 1-800-NEXT-STEP or text NEXTSTEP to 53342 (AZ), 1-888-...
    Más Menos
    31 m
  • SQUAD: Big 12 NEEDS Expansion Merger With ACC to Stay Alive, Defeat ACC, Big 10 in NCAA Arms Race

    SQUAD: Big 12 NEEDS Expansion Merger With ACC to Stay Alive, Defeat ACC, Big 10 in NCAA Arms Race
    Jun 5 2025

    While there are valid concerns about the concentration of power in the SEC and Big Ten, there are also arguments to be made that their growing influence could have some positive outcomes for college football: Increased Financial Stability: The substantial media rights deals secured by the SEC and Big Ten provide unprecedented financial stability for their member institutions. This can lead to improved facilities, better resources for athletes, and increased investment in academic support. This could also lead to better player safety, with better medical care, and better equipment. Enhanced Player Welfare: The increased revenue generated by these conferences could lead to greater investment in player welfare, including improved healthcare, mental health services, and academic support. There is also the possibility of revenue sharing with the players, that would give the athletes more financial stability. Higher Level of Competition: The concentration of top talent in the SEC and Big Ten could lead to a higher overall level of competition. This could result in more exciting games and a more compelling product for fans. This will lead to a higher level of play, that will benefit the athletes. Standardization and Professionalization: The SEC and Big Ten's influence could lead to greater standardization of rules, regulations, and practices across college football. This could create a more professionalized environment, with improved officiating, better enforcement of rules, and a more consistent experience for fans. Increased National Attention: The dominance of the SEC and Big Ten could lead to increased national attention for college football, further enhancing its popularity and cultural significance. This increased attention, will lead to more revenue, which can be used to improve the sport. Potential for a More Streamlined Postseason: With the power that these two conferences hold, there is a chance that a more streamlined post season will emerge. This could lead to a better, and more exciting, playoff system. It's important to acknowledge that there are potential downsides to this concentration of power. However, it's also worth considering the potential benefits that could arise from the SEC and Big Ten's growing influence. Support Us By Supporting Our Sponsors! NissanTake your adventures to new heights in the All-New Nissan Armada PRO-4X. Learn more at NissanUSA.com.Disclaimers:Optional features. Towing capacity varies by configuration. See Nissan Towing Guide and Owner’s Manual for additional information. Always secure cargo. Supply HouseJoin the Trade Master program today at SupplyHouse.com/TM and start ordering plumbing, HVAC, and electrical supplies with just a few clicks. Plus, use promo code SH5 for 5% off your first order. That’s SupplyHouse.com! ROYDownload the Roy app now from the App Store and start backing your favorite athletes the way they deserve—with transparency, trust, and a real impact. This is the future of college sports. Join it now by downloading Roy and supporting your favorite players! FanDuelRight now, new FanDuel customers can get ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTY DOLLARS in Bonus Bets if your first FIVE DOLLAR bet wins!Download the app or head to FANDUEL.COM to get started. Bet with FanDuel—Official Partner of the NBA. FANDUEL DISCLAIMER: 21+ in select states. First online real money wager only. Bonus issued as nonwithdrawable free bets that expires in 14 days. Restrictions apply. See terms at sportsbook.fanduel.com. Gambling Problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER or visit FanDuel.com/RG (CO, IA, MD, MI, NJ, PA, IL, VA, WV), 1-800-NEXT-STEP or text NEXTSTEP to 53342 (AZ), 1-888-789-7777 or visit ccpg.org/chat (CT), 1-800-9-WITH-IT (IN), 1-800-522-4700 (WY, KS) or visit ksgamblinghelp.com (KS), 1-877-770-STOP (LA), 1-877-8-HOPENY or text HOPENY (467369) (NY), TN REDLINE 1-800-889-9789 (TN) Follow & Subscribe on all Podcast platforms… 🎧 https://link.chtbl.com/LOBig12?sid=YouTube Locked On College Conferences, HBCU, Basketball & More 🎧 https://linktr.ee/LockedOnCollege Follow on Twitter: https://twitter.com/drakectoll Follow the show on Twitter: https://twitter.com/LOBig12
    Más Menos
    10 m
  • EXPOSED: ESPN, National Media PURPOSELY IGNORING Big 12 to Save Money On TV Deal, BYU to TCU Harmed

    EXPOSED: ESPN, National Media PURPOSELY IGNORING Big 12 to Save Money On TV Deal, BYU to TCU Harmed
    Jun 5 2025

    The sentiment that ESPN and other major networks are biased against the Big 12 Conference is a recurring and strong feeling among many Big 12 fans, athletic directors, and even its commissioner, Brett Yormark. While networks would argue their coverage is driven by viewership and market demand, the perception of bias stems from several key areas: 1. Dominance of SEC and Big Ten Narratives: Media Rights Focus: ESPN has an incredibly deep and financially lucrative partnership with the SEC, essentially operating the SEC Network and heavily featuring SEC content across its main channels. Similarly, FOX has made the Big Ten a central pillar of its college football coverage, especially for prime viewing slots. This financial investment naturally leads to a disproportionate amount of airtime, analysis, and promotional efforts dedicated to these two conferences. For Big 12 fans, it often feels like their league is an afterthought or relegated to less prominent channels and time slots. "Super Conference" Framing: The media often propagates a narrative that the SEC and Big Ten are the two "superconferences," with everyone else effectively battling for third place. This framing, while perhaps reflecting current financial realities, can diminish the perceived competitiveness and quality of the Big 12, regardless of on-field results. 2. Perceived Disadvantage in Playoff Selection and Rankings: CFP Model Debates: The recent debates over the College Football Playoff (CFP) expansion and format have significantly fueled this perception. Proposals that favored the SEC and Big Ten with more automatic qualifiers (e.g., four each) while limiting the Big 12 to fewer, even if it performs well, are seen as direct evidence of a systemic bias. Fans feel that if a Big 12 team has a comparable record to an SEC or Big Ten team, the latter often gets the benefit of the doubt in rankings and playoff consideration due to "conference strength," which is partly built by media narrative. ESPN's FPI Rankings: As recent reports indicate, ESPN's own Football Power Index (FPI) rankings have drawn criticism for what many perceive as a strong bias towards the SEC. For instance, the 2025 FPI showing an "astonishing 13 SEC teams in the top 25" including the top three, with the Big 12 only having two, makes Big 12 fans question the methodology and whether it inherently undervalues their conference while overvaluing SEC schedules or historical performance. This suggests a potential "self-fulfilling prophecy" where the model's emphasis on predictive metrics might amplify existing biases. 3. Quality of Coverage and Commentary: Less In-Depth Analysis: Some Big 12 fans feel that national broadcasts offer less in-depth analysis of their conference's teams, players, and storylines compared to the dominant leagues. Outdated Narratives: There's a lingering frustration that some national commentators still rely on outdated narratives about the Big 12, such as the idea of it being an "all offense, no defense" conference, even as the league's defensive play has improved. Dismissive Tone: Occasionally, fans perceive a dismissive or condescending tone from national commentators when discussing Big 12 teams or results, reinforcing the feeling that the conference isn't taken as seriously. 4. Big 12's Response: Commissioner Brett Yormark's Advocacy: Big 12 Commissioner Brett Yormark has been notably aggressive in promoting the Big 12 and challenging what he sees as unfair treatment. His outspokenness, particularly in advocating for a "5+11" CFP model (where conference champions earn their way in, rather than being guaranteed spots based on conference affiliation), is a direct response to this perceived bias and a push for greater fairness for the Big 12. He wants the Big 12 to "earn it on the field" and not be penalized by predetermined biases. In essence, while networks operate on business principles of ratings and marketability, the significant investment in, and heavy promotion of, the SEC and Big Ten by major networks like ESPN leads to a strong and understandable feeling among Big 12 fans that their conference faces an inherent bias, affecting everything from game selection to national perception and playoff access. Follow & Subscribe on all Podcast platforms… 🎧 https://link.chtbl.com/LOBig12?sid=YouTube Locked On College Conferences, HBCU, Basketball & More 🎧 https://linktr.ee/LockedOnCollege Follow on Twitter: https://twitter.com/drakectoll Follow the show on Twitter: https://twitter.com/LOBig12
    Más Menos
    9 m
  • BOMBSHELL: Big 12, ACC JOINING In Expansion Merger With New ESPN Contract Is MASSIVE If It Happens

    BOMBSHELL: Big 12, ACC JOINING In Expansion Merger With New ESPN Contract Is MASSIVE If It Happens
    Jun 4 2025
    The idea of a Big 12 and ACC merger is one of the more significant "what if" scenarios being discussed in college athletics realignment, particularly as a response to the dominance and increasing self-governance of the SEC and Big Ten. It's a complex proposition with many moving parts, especially concerning media rights.Here's what a Big 12-ACC merger could look like and why it's being considered:The Driving Force: Counterbalancing the SEC and Big TenThe primary motivation for a merger is to create a "third superconference" that could potentially compete financially and politically with the SEC and Big Ten. With the Big Ten and SEC reportedly pushing for a College Football Playoff (CFP) format that heavily favors their conferences with automatic bids, a combined Big 12-ACC entity would have significantly more leverage in future negotiations for media rights, CFP access, and overall college football governance.Key Challenges and Hurdles:The ACC Grant of Rights (GoR): This is the biggest obstacle. The ACC's Grant of Rights agreement binds its member schools' media rights to the conference through 2036. This means that even if a school leaves the ACC, the conference would retain the rights to their games' media revenue. The exit fee for leaving the ACC is also substantial, though recent lawsuits by Florida State and Clemson are challenging its enforceability. For a full merger to happen before 2036, it would likely require: Unraveling Media Deals: ESPN (ACC's partner) and Fox/ESPN (Big 12's partners) would need to agree to dissolve their current contracts and negotiate a new, potentially much larger, joint deal. This is a massive and complicated undertaking, as these networks already have "cut-rate deals" with the respective conferences.Legal Settlements: If any ACC schools are to leave, their lawsuits against the ACC regarding the GoR would need to be resolved, or the new merged entity would need to somehow absorb or pay those exit fees.Size and Logistics:Potential Scale: Combining the current Big 12 (16 teams) and the ACC (17 teams, including Notre Dame for some sports) would create a massive conference of 33 teams. This scale presents significant logistical challenges for scheduling, travel, and managing a single conference championship.Divisions/Pods: Such a large conference would almost certainly require multiple divisions or "pods" for competition. This could lead to a less unified conference identity and reduced frequency of play between all members.Cultural and Athletic Fit:Football vs. Basketball Focus: The ACC has historically been a strong basketball conference with traditional powers, while the Big 12 has often been seen as a football-first league with strong basketball. Merging these distinct cultures could present challenges, though both conferences certainly have strong programs in both sports.Geographic Sprawl: The combined geographic footprint would be vast, stretching from Florida and Boston in the east to Arizona and Utah in the west. This would significantly increase travel costs and logistical complexities for all sports.What a Merger Could Look Like (Hypothetical Scenarios):Given the GoR hurdle, a full, immediate merger might be less likely than other forms of cooperation or phased integration. However, if it were to happen, here are some possibilities:A "Super-League" with Divisions: A merged conference could establish regional divisions (e.g., East, Central, West) to manage travel and rivalries.Example: An "Atlantic Division" could include ACC East Coast schools, a "Central Division" could be former Big 12 heartland teams, and a "Mountain West" division could house the former Pac-12 additions.Tiered Revenue Sharing (Less Likely but Possible): While both the Big 12 and ACC currently have equal revenue sharing among full members, a massive merged league might explore a tiered system, though this often causes internal friction.Football/Basketball Splits (Highly Unlikely): Some have mused about a "football-only" merger or a basketball-focused merger, but given the current integrated nature of collegiate athletic departments and media deals tied to all sports, this is generally considered impractical.Strategic Poaching: Instead of a full merger, a more likely scenario (especially as the ACC's GoR theoretically weakens closer to 2036 or through ongoing lawsuits) is that the Big 12 would target specific, high-value ACC programs (e.g., Florida State, Clemson, Miami, North Carolina, Virginia, Duke, Louisville) to expand its footprint and increase its media value, effectively dismantling the ACC. This is a constant rumor and strategy being explored.Why it's still being discussed:Necessity: Many believe that remaining as standalone entities will leave the Big 12 and ACC too far behind the SEC and Big Ten in the long run, particularly with the new direct athlete compensation model.Brett Yormark's Ambition: Big 12 Commissioner Brett Yormark has proven aggressive and "open for business" in ...
    Más Menos
    29 m
  • HUGE: BYU, Houston Are About to WIN THE LOTTERY, $13 Million Revenue Increase From Big 12, ESPN, FOX

    HUGE: BYU, Houston Are About to WIN THE LOTTERY, $13 Million Revenue Increase From Big 12, ESPN, FOX
    Jun 3 2025
    The move to the Big 12 Conference for BYU and Houston, and specifically receiving full shares of the conference's revenue, is widely seen as a pivotal moment that will significantly boost their athletic programs, with the potential to elevate them to "powerhouse" status over time.Here's why getting a full share of Big 12 revenue is a game-changer for BYU and Houston:1. Massive Increase in Financial Resources:From Partial to Full Shares: For the 2024-2025 athletic year, BYU, Houston, UCF, and Cincinnati received partial Big 12 shares, estimated at around $19 million each. Starting with the 2025-2026 fiscal year, all 16 Big 12 schools, including BYU and Houston, will receive full and equal revenue shares from the conference's new media deal.Projected Revenue: This full share is originally estimated to be around $50 million each annually, including NCAA Tournament and bowl payouts. This is a substantial increase, representing a jump of over $30 million per year for both BYU and Houston compared to their previous partial shares.Comparable to P5 Peers: This full share revenue puts them on a much more comparable financial footing with established Power Four conference programs, allowing them to compete in areas where they previously faced significant budgetary disadvantages.2. Direct Athlete Compensation (Revenue Sharing):House v. NCAA Settlement Impact: The proposed House v. NCAA settlement allows schools to directly pay athletes for NIL, with a tentative annual cap of $20.5 million per school for the 2025-2026 fiscal year.Ability to Compete: This increased conference revenue is crucial for BYU and Houston to be able to afford to distribute the maximum allowable amount to their athletes. While the $20.5 million cap is a significant expense, receiving $50 million in conference revenue means they have the financial capability to meet or get very close to this new standard, which is essential for recruiting and retaining top talent. Houston, for example, has already announced intentions to share revenue with student-athletes at or close to the expected cap.3. Enhanced Recruiting Power:NIL Collectives: While the new revenue-sharing model will likely reduce the reliance on external NIL collectives, the ability for schools to directly pay athletes from conference revenue makes their recruiting pitches much stronger.Competitive Arms Race: Top recruits are increasingly drawn to programs that can offer competitive NIL opportunities and direct payments. Having a full Big 12 share allows BYU and Houston to directly compete with programs from other Power Four conferences for talent.Facilities and Staff: Increased revenue also means more investment in state-of-the-art facilities, larger and more specialized coaching and support staffs (strength and conditioning, nutrition, mental health), and recruiting budgets – all critical for attracting and developing elite athletes. Both BYU and Houston have been investing in their athletic facilities in recent years, and the increased revenue will accelerate these efforts.4. Sustained Visibility and Brand Growth:Consistent Exposure: Being in the Big 12 ensures consistent national television exposure and participation in a major conference championship race. This keeps BYU and Houston in the national conversation year-round.Attracting Sponsors: Higher visibility and a larger fan base generate more interest from corporate sponsors and donors, creating additional revenue streams beyond the conference distribution.Why "Powerhouses" is a realistic aspiration:BYU: Has a rich football tradition, a passionate national fanbase, and a strong institutional commitment to athletics. During its independence era, BYU actively sought to increase its revenue and maintain competitiveness, nearly doubling its athletic revenue between 2008-2010 and 2017-2019. Now, with a guaranteed Power Four revenue stream, they can build on that foundation and strategically invest to reclaim past glory. Their financial discipline during independence might even position them well to adapt to the new revenue-sharing model.Houston: Has historically been a "sleeping giant" with access to a massive talent pool in Texas. They have been aggressively investing in their athletic programs for years, including significant institutional support and fundraising efforts (like the "Houston Rise" campaign). Receiving a full Big 12 share validates and supercharges their long-standing ambition to be a national contender. They have already made significant investments in facilities like their Football Operations Center.While becoming a "powerhouse" isn't guaranteed overnight and requires sustained winning, strong coaching, and savvy program management, gaining a full share of Big 12 revenue provides BYU and Houston with the financial backbone to truly compete at the highest level of college football, making the aspiration a very realistic long-term goal.
    Más Menos
    9 m
  • HUGE: Brett Yormark Just EXPOSED the SEC, Goes SCORCHED EARTH On College Football Playoff Monopoly

    HUGE: Brett Yormark Just EXPOSED the SEC, Goes SCORCHED EARTH On College Football Playoff Monopoly
    Jun 2 2025
    Big 12 Commissioner Brett Yormark has indeed been quite vocal this week, engaging in a rather pointed, albeit indirect, back-and-forth with SEC Commissioner Greg Sankey, primarily centered on the future format of the College Football Playoff (CFP). This unfolded during the respective spring meetings for their conferences. Here's a breakdown of the dynamic:Greg Sankey's Initial Jab: Ahead of the SEC's spring meetings, Greg Sankey made a public statement that was widely interpreted as a shot at the Big 12 and ACC commissioners. He said, "I don't need lectures from others about the good of the game — I don't lecture others about good of the game — or coordinating press releases about the good of the game." This was seen as a clear dismissal of any suggestions from other conferences regarding the direction of college football, implying that the SEC knows what's best. Brett Yormark's Response and Stance: When asked about Sankey's comments at the close of the Big 12's spring meetings in Orlando, Yormark responded with characteristic directness and a touch of dry wit:"I agreed with Greg's follow-up statement that I'd be entertained by it, and I was," Yormark deadpanned.He continued, "We all have thick skin here. But the neat thing about our relationship amongst the commissioners is we're going to battle. That's part of life. We're going to agree to disagree. We're kind of in that mode right now, but I have a lot of respect for my peers, and I know they have a lot of respect for me and Jim [Phillips, ACC Commissioner], and we'll end up in the right place."The Core of the "Battle": CFP Format: The underlying tension revolves around the College Football Playoff format.SEC/Big Ten's Initial Preference: The Big Ten and SEC had initially pushed for a model that would grant them significantly more automatic qualifiers (e.g., four each) into the expanded CFP, leaving fewer spots for other conferences.Yormark's Advocacy for 5+11: Brett Yormark has been a strong proponent of the "5+11" format, which would give automatic berths to the champions of the four "Power" conferences (ACC, Big Ten, Big 12, SEC) plus the highest-ranked Group of Five champion, with the remaining 11 spots being at-large selections by the CFP committee."Earn it on the Field": Yormark reiterated his support for the 5+11 model, emphasizing the Big 12's desire to "earn it on the field" rather than relying on "gimmes" or guaranteed spots based purely on conference affiliation. He stated that while the 5+11 format might not be "ideal" for the Big 12 (as it only guarantees one spot), it's "good for college football" and "what's fair."Public and Coach Momentum: Yormark also noted that the "public is voting yes for it" and that even SEC football coaches reportedly prefer the 5+11 model, suggesting a disconnect between some coaches and their conference leadership.Beyond the CFP: Scheduling Alliances: Yormark also subtly stood up to the SEC and Big Ten by dismissing the idea of the Big 12 entering into a scheduling alliance with any particular conference, as the SEC and Big Ten have discussed. He stated, "No. We're fine. We love our out-of-conference schedule. We don't necessarily have an alliance with any particular conference. We play them all." This reinforces the Big 12's independent path and its focus on broader competition rather than consolidating power with the two biggest leagues. In essence, Brett Yormark's actions this week demonstrated a clear resolve to advocate for what he believes is fair and beneficial for the broader landscape of college football, directly challenging the perceived power grab by the SEC and Big Ten in shaping the sport's future. He showed he's not intimidated by Sankey's rhetoric and is ready to "battle" for the Big 12's interests and the integrity of the game. Support Us By Supporting Our Sponsors!Monarch MoneyTake control of your finances with Monarch Money. Use code LOCKEDONCOLLEGE at monarchmoney.com for 50% off your first year.FanDuelRight now, new customers can get TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS in BONUS BETS when your first FIVE DOLLAR BET WINS! Download the app or head to FANDUEL.COM to get started. Bet with FanDuel—Official Partner of the NBA.FANDUEL DISCLAIMER: 21+ in select states. First online real money wager only. Bonus issued as nonwithdrawable free bets that expires in 14 days. Restrictions apply. See terms at sportsbook.fanduel.com. Gambling Problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER or visit FanDuel.com/RG (CO, IA, MD, MI, NJ, PA, IL, VA, WV), 1-800-NEXT-STEP or text NEXTSTEP to 53342 (AZ), 1-888-789-7777 or visit ccpg.org/chat (CT), 1-800-9-WITH-IT (IN), 1-800-522-4700 (WY, KS) or visit ksgamblinghelp.com (KS), 1-877-770-STOP (LA), 1-877-8-HOPENY or text HOPENY (467369) (NY), TN REDLINE 1-800-889-9789 (TN)
    Más Menos
    28 m
  • SEC DESPERATELY Wants to Change the Rules, Big 12 TAKING OVER | Big 12 Squad

    SEC DESPERATELY Wants to Change the Rules, Big 12 TAKING OVER | Big 12 Squad
    May 29 2025

    Big 12 football is at a crossroads. With SEC politics heating up and the Big 12's competitive edge in question, what does the future hold for college football? Dive into the latest controversies surrounding BYU quarterback Jake Retzlaff's legal issues and Texas Tech booster Cody Campbell's financial influence. Hosts Drake Toll, Jake Catch, and others dissect Greg Sankey's SEC maneuvers, the implications of BYU's honor code, and the role of billionaire alumni like T. Boone Pickens in shaping the Big 12's destiny.

    Will the Big 12's strategic moves redefine the college football landscape? Tune in for expert analysis and insider perspectives on these pivotal developments.
    Más Menos
    33 m
adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_T1_webcro805_stickypopup