BROKE: BYU to Texas Tech, Every Big 12 School Owes $20 MILLION IMMEDIATELY, Destroying Sport Revenue Podcast Por arte de portada

BROKE: BYU to Texas Tech, Every Big 12 School Owes $20 MILLION IMMEDIATELY, Destroying Sport Revenue

BROKE: BYU to Texas Tech, Every Big 12 School Owes $20 MILLION IMMEDIATELY, Destroying Sport Revenue

Escúchala gratis

Ver detalles del espectáculo

Acerca de esta escucha

 The landmark House v. NCAA antitrust settlement, which received final approval from a federal judge in late May 2025, is indeed set to impose a significant financial burden on all Division I universities, including BYU and others, primarily through a new model of direct athlete compensation. Here's how it will cost universities an estimated $20 million annually and why it's a challenge, particularly for schools outside the wealthiest tier:The $20.5 Million Annual Cap for Direct Athlete Payments:New Revenue Sharing: Starting on July 1, 2025, the settlement allows (and for Power Four conferences, effectively requires) Division I schools to directly share revenue with their athletes. This marks a revolutionary departure from the NCAA's long-standing amateurism model.Initial Cap: The initial annual cap for this direct athlete compensation is set at approximately $20.5 million per school for the 2025-2026 academic year. This cap is expected to increase by at least 4% annually over the 10-year term of the settlement.Across All Sports: This $20.5 million is intended to cover compensation across all varsity sports within the athletic department, not just revenue-generating sports like football and men's basketball.Funding Breakdown (General Expectation): While individual schools have discretion on how to allocate the funds, the general expectation is that the vast majority will go to the highest-revenue sports. Projections suggest:Around 75% ($15 million) will go to football players.Approximately 15% ($3 million) will go to men's basketball players.Around 5% ($1 million) to women's basketball players.The remaining 5% ($1 million) to all other sports.How This Hurts All Universities, Including BYU:Massive New Expense: This $20.5 million represents a brand-new, mandatory expense that athletic departments must now absorb. For many schools, even those in Power Four conferences, this is a significant and sudden increase to their annual operating budget.Budgetary Strain: Athletic departments, while generating substantial revenue, also have considerable expenses (coaching salaries, facilities, travel, scholarships, administrative costs). Adding $20.5 million per year for direct athlete pay will strain budgets, potentially requiring cuts elsewhere, increased fundraising, or even larger subsidies from the university's general fund (which often comes from student tuition or state appropriations).Maintaining Competitiveness: The "cost of doing business" in high-level college athletics has just dramatically increased. To remain competitive in recruiting and player retention, schools feel compelled to pay close to that $20.5 million cap. Failure to do so could put them at a disadvantage against rival programs that can afford to pay more.Impact on Non-Revenue Sports: While the majority of the money is expected to go to football and men's basketball, the requirement to allocate some funds to other sports, coupled with the overall budget strain, raises concerns for non-revenue generating sports. Some speculate that schools might have to cut certain sports or reduce opportunities (e.g., walk-on programs, which will also be impacted by new roster limits) to manage costs, although the settlement did include a compromise to "grandfather in" roster limits for current athletes.Funding the Back Pay: In addition to the annual direct payments to current athletes, universities (through their conferences) also contribute to the $2.8 billion in back pay for athletes who competed between 2016 and 2024. This payment is distributed over 10 years, further impacting conference revenue distributions to schools. The Power Four conferences are responsible for 24% of these damages, while the NCAA covers 40% and other conferences cover the rest through reduced distributions.Impact on BYU and Similar Schools:BYU, as a newly full-share member of the Big 12 (receiving around $50 million annually from media rights starting 2025-2026), is in a relatively strong position compared to some. However, it's still a significant financial challenge:Affordability Question: Even with their increased Big 12 revenue, the question remains if BYU can comfortably afford the full $20.5 million without impacting other areas. BYU has historically run a very lean, debt-free athletic department without direct Church funding for athletics. The increased Big 12 revenue in 2023-2024 (partial share) and 2025-2026 (full share) helps, but that $20.5 million is a new expense.In conclusion, the House v. NCAA settlement represents a fundamental shift in college sports, directly putting a $20.5 million annual bill on universities for direct athlete compensation. While necessary from a legal standpoint to avoid even larger liabilities, it creates a new and substantial financial pressure on all athletic departments, forcing them to re-evaluate budgets, revenue streams, and competitive strategies in this unprecedented era.Support Us By Supporting Our Sponsors!GametimeToday's episode...
adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_webcro805_stickypopup
Todavía no hay opiniones