Episodios

  • The Diddy Trial: Cassie Ventura Takes The Stand During Day 2 (Part 1) (5/14/25)

    The Diddy Trial: Cassie Ventura Takes The Stand During Day 2 (Part 1) (5/14/25)
    May 14 2025
    During her testimony in Sean "Diddy" Combs's federal sex trafficking trial, Cassie Ventura detailed a decade-long relationship marked by control, abuse, and coercion. She described how Combs exerted dominance over her personal and professional life, dictating aspects such as her clothing choices and daily interactions. Ventura recounted being subjected to physical violence for minor infractions, including being beaten for making "the wrong face." She also testified about being forced to carry a firearm for Combs, which she believed was intended to intimidate her .

    Ventura's testimony included accounts of being compelled to participate in "freak-offs," which she described as drug-fueled, multi-day sex parties involving male escorts, orchestrated and filmed by Combs. She alleged that during these events, she was forced into degrading acts, such as being urinated on, and was left to clean up afterward. Ventura expressed feelings of humiliation and worthlessness, stating that she engaged in these acts out of fear and a sense of obligation. She also recounted a 2016 incident, captured on surveillance video, where Combs assaulted her in a hotel hallway. Throughout her testimony, Ventura emphasized the pervasive control and abuse she endured, which she said led her to abandon her music career .


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




    source:

    May 13, 2025 - Day 2 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs trial | CNN
    Más Menos
    23 m
  • Diddy The Abused? Diddy And The Plan To Claim The 'Mutual Combat Defense' (5/14/25)

    Diddy The Abused? Diddy And The Plan To Claim The 'Mutual Combat Defense' (5/14/25)
    May 14 2025
    In his ongoing federal sex trafficking trial, Sean "Diddy" Combs' defense team is asserting that his past relationship with singer Cassie Ventura involved mutual domestic violence. Attorney Marc Agnifilo acknowledged Combs' involvement in domestic violence but emphasized that the abuse was reciprocal, stating, "We are absolutely going to admit to domestic violence. But at what point does it become coercive?" The defense aims to challenge Ventura's credibility by presenting evidence, including two cell phone videos, that allegedly depict her exhibiting violent behavior towards Combs. They also plan to introduce a "corrected" version of the 2016 hotel surveillance footage showing Combs assaulting Ventura, which had previously surfaced and led to public backlash.


    This strategy is part of a broader defense narrative portraying Combs' actions as part of a consensual "swinger lifestyle," rather than criminal behavior. The defense contends that the prosecution is mischaracterizing consensual activities and plans to question the motivations of the accusers. Combs has pleaded not guilty to all charges, which include racketeering conspiracy and sex trafficking. The trial, expected to last approximately eight weeks, will feature testimony from multiple witnesses, including Ventura, and could involve discussions of various celebrities during proceedings.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:


    Diddy Trial: Sean Combs Says He's Cassie's Domestic Violence Victim - Business Insider
    Más Menos
    15 m
  • Judge Subramanian Denies Diddy's Attempt To Drop Count 3 And Count 5 (5/14/25)

    Judge Subramanian Denies Diddy's Attempt To Drop Count 3 And Count 5 (5/14/25)
    May 14 2025
    In case 24-CR-542 (AS), Sean Combs sought dismissal of counts three and five of the superseding indictment, which accuse him of violating 18 U.S.C. § 2421(a). These counts allege that Combs transported Victim-1, Victim-2, and unnamed commercial sex workers across state and international borders with the intent of engaging them in prostitution. Combs’ legal team argued that these charges amounted to selective prosecution, claiming the statute was being used unfairly and in a discriminatory manner against him due to his status as a prominent Black man. His defense positioned this argument within the context of alleged systemic bias, asserting that similar conduct by others has not historically drawn comparable federal charges.

    The presiding judge rejected Combs’ motion and denied dismissal of the charges. The court found no credible basis for the claim of selective prosecution, emphasizing that Combs failed to meet the legal standard required to prove such a claim. Specifically, he did not present sufficient evidence showing that others similarly situated were not prosecuted or that the decision to charge him was driven by improper discriminatory motives. The ruling ensures that counts three and five will remain part of the case as it proceeds to trial, keeping key elements of the government’s sex trafficking allegations intact.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.325.0_1.pdf
    Más Menos
    11 m
  • Mega Edition: The RICO Laws And Another Allegation Against Diddy (5/14/25)

    Mega Edition: The RICO Laws And Another Allegation Against Diddy (5/14/25)
    May 14 2025

    The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, commonly known as RICO, is a United States federal law enacted in 1970. It was designed to combat organized crime by targeting the activities of criminal enterprises, also known as "racketeering" organizations. RICO provides law enforcement agencies with powerful tools to investigate, prosecute, and dismantle these organizations.Under RICO, individuals or groups engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity can be charged and held accountable for their actions. Racketeering activities include various crimes such as bribery, extortion, gambling, money laundering, murder, drug trafficking, and fraud.Key features of RICO include:
    1. Criminal and Civil Liability: RICO allows both criminal and civil charges to be brought against individuals or organizations involved in racketeering activities. Criminal penalties can include fines, imprisonment, and asset forfeiture, while civil actions can result in monetary damages.
    2. Predicate Acts: RICO requires at least two acts of racketeering activity, also known as "predicate acts," to establish a pattern of racketeering. These acts can be a combination of state or federal crimes, and they must be related to each other and the enterprise.
    3. Enterprise: RICO targets not only individuals involved in criminal activities but also the enterprises or organizations that engage in such activities. An enterprise can be any legal entity, including corporations, partnerships, associations, or even non-profit organizations.
    4. RICO Conspiracy: RICO allows for the prosecution of individuals involved in a conspiracy to engage in racketeering activities, even if they did not directly commit the predicate acts themselves. This provision enables law enforcement to go after the entire network of individuals involved in organized crime.
    5. Enhanced Penalties: RICO provides enhanced penalties for those convicted of racketeering offenses. For example, individuals convicted under RICO can face up to 20 years in prison for each racketeering count and up to life imprisonment if the underlying racketeering activity includes murder.
    6. Civil RICO Lawsuits: RICO also empowers private individuals or entities to file civil lawsuits against racketeering organizations. Successful plaintiffs can be awarded triple damages for their losses, attorney's fees, and other remedies.
    Overall, RICO is a powerful legal tool in the fight against organized crime. It allows law enforcement agencies to disrupt criminal enterprises, prosecute key individuals involved, and dismantle their operations. Its broad scope and severe penalties make RICO a significant weapon in combating complex criminal networks.

    Also...




    A former actor has filed a lawsuit against Sean "Diddy" Combs, alleging that during an October 2001 video casting meeting, Combs drugged and anally raped him. The accuser claims that after consuming a tampered Diet Coke provided by Combs, he became disoriented and was assaulted. Following this, another individual allegedly used a metal device to forcibly perform oral sex on him while taunting him. The plaintiff asserts that these incidents resulted in significant physical injuries, including a damaged anus and broken teeth, necessitating medical treatment.

    This lawsuit is among several recent legal actions against Combs, who is currently facing multiple allegations of sexual misconduct. His attorney has denied these claims, characterizing them as attempts at extortion. Additionally, Combs is under federal indictment for charges including racketeering and sex trafficking, with a trial date set for May 2025. He maintains his innocence regarding all allegations.



    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
    Más Menos
    29 m
  • Joseph Manzaro And The Lawsuit Filed Against Diddy And His Alleged Co-Conspirators (Part 2)

    Joseph Manzaro And The Lawsuit Filed Against Diddy And His Alleged Co-Conspirators (Part 2)
    May 14 2025
    ​On April 1, 2025, plaintiff Manzaro Joseph filed a federal lawsuit in the Southern District of Florida against Sean "Diddy" Combs and several associates, including Eric Mejias, Brendan Paul, Emilio Estefan, and Adria English. The complaint alleges that the defendants participated in a criminal enterprise involving human trafficking, sexual exploitation, kidnapping, and obstruction of justice. Joseph claims he was drugged, transported across state lines, and subjected to sexual violence orchestrated by Combs, with assistance from the other named individuals. The lawsuit invokes federal statutes such as the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA), the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), and the Civil Rights Act, as well as Florida's human trafficking laws.

    The complaint details each defendant's alleged role: Mejias is accused of drugging and threatening Joseph; Paul of coordinating transportation; Estefan of facilitating and approving the transport; and English of aiding in Joseph's targeting and concealment. Joseph also references unidentified individuals ("DOE Johns") who may have contributed to the alleged crimes. He seeks damages and injunctive relief, asserting that the defendants' actions violated multiple federal and state laws. The case brings renewed scrutiny to Combs, who has faced previous legal challenges, and raises questions about the involvement of high-profile individuals in alleged criminal activities.



    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    gov.uscourts.flsd.686843.1.0.pdf
    Más Menos
    10 m
  • Joseph Manzaro And The Lawsuit Filed Against Diddy And His Alleged Co-Conspirators (Part 1)

    Joseph Manzaro And The Lawsuit Filed Against Diddy And His Alleged Co-Conspirators (Part 1)
    May 14 2025
    ​On April 1, 2025, plaintiff Manzaro Joseph filed a federal lawsuit in the Southern District of Florida against Sean "Diddy" Combs and several associates, including Eric Mejias, Brendan Paul, Emilio Estefan, and Adria English. The complaint alleges that the defendants participated in a criminal enterprise involving human trafficking, sexual exploitation, kidnapping, and obstruction of justice. Joseph claims he was drugged, transported across state lines, and subjected to sexual violence orchestrated by Combs, with assistance from the other named individuals. The lawsuit invokes federal statutes such as the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA), the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), and the Civil Rights Act, as well as Florida's human trafficking laws.

    The complaint details each defendant's alleged role: Mejias is accused of drugging and threatening Joseph; Paul of coordinating transportation; Estefan of facilitating and approving the transport; and English of aiding in Joseph's targeting and concealment. Joseph also references unidentified individuals ("DOE Johns") who may have contributed to the alleged crimes. He seeks damages and injunctive relief, asserting that the defendants' actions violated multiple federal and state laws. The case brings renewed scrutiny to Combs, who has faced previous legal challenges, and raises questions about the involvement of high-profile individuals in alleged criminal activities.



    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    gov.uscourts.flsd.686843.1.0.pdf
    Más Menos
    11 m
  • A Man Named Joseph Manzaro And His Wild Claims Made Against Diddy, Lebron, Jay-Z And More

    A Man Named Joseph Manzaro And His Wild Claims Made Against Diddy, Lebron, Jay-Z And More
    May 14 2025
    ​In April 2025, Joseph Manzaro filed a lawsuit against Sean "Diddy" Combs, alleging that in 2015, he was drugged, abducted, and sexually assaulted at a party hosted by Combs. Manzaro asserts that he was forced to wear a penis mask and paraded in front of attendees, including celebrities such as Jay-Z, Beyoncé, and LeBron James. He claims that Beyoncé expressed confusion upon seeing him in this state, questioning the situation. The lawsuit describes the event as a "freak-off" party involving non-consensual acts.

    Representatives for Jay-Z and Beyoncé have denied their clients' attendance at the event, citing evidence that places them elsewhere during the time in question. Combs' legal team has dismissed Manzaro's allegations as baseless, suggesting they are attempts to gain publicity and financial compensation. The Estefans, whose property was allegedly used during the incident, also refute the claims, stating that no such events occurred at their residence during that period. This lawsuit adds to a series of legal challenges facing Combs, who is currently awaiting trial on charges including sex trafficking and racketeering.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    Beyoncé, Jay-Z mentioned in Diddy human trafficking lawsuit | Fox News
    Más Menos
    14 m
  • Rodney "Lil Rod" Jones And The Amended Complaint Against Diddy (Part 15)

    Rodney "Lil Rod" Jones And The Amended Complaint Against Diddy (Part 15)
    May 14 2025
    The allegations that Sean "Puff Daddy" Combs is currently facing are not new to him. In fact, he's been accused of things similar many times in the past. Now, with the dam breaking and many accusers coming forward, for those of us who have followed the Jeffrey Epstein case, the similarities are very, very apparent and when looking at the way things have transpired since these most recent allegations have been made, it's not hard to follow the thread connecting these civil allegations and the current criminal ones.


    In this episode we get a look at those allegations for ourselves and why this is looking like it's going to be a major RICO case against Sean "Puff Daddy" Combs.




    The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) is a United States federal law enacted in 1970 to combat organized crime. RICO targets individuals or groups involved in illegal enterprises, known as "racketeering activities," such as bribery, extortion, fraud, and money laundering.Key features of RICO include:
    1. Criminalization of Racketeering Activity: RICO makes it a federal crime to participate in, or conspire to participate in, the affairs of an enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity.
    2. Enterprise: RICO applies to both legitimate and illegitimate enterprises, including corporations, partnerships, and other associations.
    3. Pattern of Racketeering Activity: A pattern is established by engaging in at least two instances of racketeering activity within ten years.
    4. Consequences: Individuals convicted under RICO can face substantial fines, forfeiture of assets, and imprisonment for up to 20 years per racketeering count, with potential enhancements for multiple offenses.
    RICO has been used extensively against organized crime syndicates, such as the Mafia, but it has also been employed in cases involving various other criminal enterprises, including drug trafficking, securities fraud, and corruption. Prosecutors often use RICO to dismantle criminal organizations by targeting not only the individuals directly involved in criminal activities but also those who facilitate or benefit from them, such as leaders, associates, and even legitimate businesses linked to the enterprise.

    To successfully prosecute under RICO, prosecutors must demonstrate the existence of an enterprise engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity, as well as the defendant's involvement in that enterprise and its illegal activities. RICO has been praised for its effectiveness in dismantling criminal organizations but has also faced criticism for its broad scope and potential for abuse in certain cases.




    In this episode, we get a look at the amended complaint that has been filed by Rodney Jones.


    (commercial at 9:26)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.30.1.pdf (courtlistener.com)
    Más Menos
    19 m
adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_T1_webcro805_stickypopup