Beyond The Horizon Podcast Por Bobby Capucci arte de portada

Beyond The Horizon

Beyond The Horizon

De: Bobby Capucci
Escúchala gratis

Acerca de esta escucha

 Beyond the Horizon is a project that aims to dig a bit deeper than just the surface level that we are so used to with the legacy media while at the same time attempting to side step the gaslighting and rhetoric in search of the truth. From the day to day news that dominates the headlines to more complex geopolitical issues that effect all of our lives, we will be exploring them all.

It's time to stop settling for what is force fed to us and it's time to look beyond the horizon.Copyright Bobby Capucci Ciencia Política Política y Gobierno
Episodios
  • Mega Edition: Diddy Looks To Get The Thalia Graves Lawsuit Tossed (Part 1-2) (7/6/25)

    Mega Edition: Diddy Looks To Get The Thalia Graves Lawsuit Tossed (Part 1-2) (7/6/25)
    Jul 6 2025
    In Case No. 24-cv-7201, Sean Combs' legal team, led by attorney Jonathan D. Davis, filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint brought by plaintiff Thalia Graves. The defense argues that Graves' allegations, which pertain to an alleged 2001 rape, are legally insufficient and fail to meet the necessary standards for proceeding to trial. They contend that the complaint lacks specific factual allegations to support claims of misconduct, asserting that the accusations are vague and do not establish a clear connection between Combs' actions and the alleged harms. Furthermore, the defense highlights that the plaintiff's claims are based on generalized assertions without concrete evidence, which, according to them, does not satisfy the legal requirements for a viable lawsuit.

    Additionally, Combs' attorneys argue that certain claims are barred by statutes of limitations and that Graves has not demonstrated the requisite elements for causes of action such as intentional infliction of emotional distress or negligence. They also assert that the complaint fails to establish a direct link between Combs' conduct and any alleged damages suffered by the plaintiff. Based on these arguments, the defense requests that the court dismiss the amended complaint in its entirety, thereby preventing the case from moving forward to discovery or trial.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




    source:

    gov.uscourts.nysd.628776.55.0.pdf
    Más Menos
    21 m
  • Diddy Moves To Exclude Rule 413 And 404 (b) Evidence From The Upcoming Trial (Part 4)

    Diddy Moves To Exclude Rule 413 And 404 (b) Evidence From The Upcoming Trial (Part 4)
    Jul 6 2025
    In this 39-page motion filed on April 7, 2025, Sean Combs’ legal team asks the court to exclude any reference to alleged prior sexual assaults under Federal Rules of Evidence 413 and 404(b). They argue that Rule 413 only applies when a defendant is formally charged with a sexual assault offense, which Combs is not—his current charges involve racketeering, sex trafficking, and related crimes, but not specific counts of sexual assault. Therefore, they assert the government’s attempt to admit uncharged sexual assault allegations under Rule 413 is legally improper and violates the plain text and legislative intent of the rule.

    Additionally, the motion challenges the admissibility of this evidence under Rule 404(b), which governs the use of prior bad acts to show motive, opportunity, or intent. Combs’ attorneys argue that the government’s notice is procedurally deficient and that the proposed evidence relies heavily on impermissible character inferences—essentially suggesting that because Combs allegedly committed bad acts before, he is more likely to have committed the crimes he’s charged with now. They also invoke Rule 403, saying the evidence has low probative value, is highly inflammatory, and would result in mini-trials over unrelated allegations, confusing the jury and unfairly prejudicing Combs. At minimum, the defense requests a preliminary hearing to assess the reliability of the evidence before it’s presented at trial.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.213.0.pdf
    Más Menos
    16 m
  • Diddy Moves To Exclude Rule 413 And 404 (b) Evidence From The Upcoming Trial (Part 3)

    Diddy Moves To Exclude Rule 413 And 404 (b) Evidence From The Upcoming Trial (Part 3)
    Jul 6 2025
    In this 39-page motion filed on April 7, 2025, Sean Combs’ legal team asks the court to exclude any reference to alleged prior sexual assaults under Federal Rules of Evidence 413 and 404(b). They argue that Rule 413 only applies when a defendant is formally charged with a sexual assault offense, which Combs is not—his current charges involve racketeering, sex trafficking, and related crimes, but not specific counts of sexual assault. Therefore, they assert the government’s attempt to admit uncharged sexual assault allegations under Rule 413 is legally improper and violates the plain text and legislative intent of the rule.

    Additionally, the motion challenges the admissibility of this evidence under Rule 404(b), which governs the use of prior bad acts to show motive, opportunity, or intent. Combs’ attorneys argue that the government’s notice is procedurally deficient and that the proposed evidence relies heavily on impermissible character inferences—essentially suggesting that because Combs allegedly committed bad acts before, he is more likely to have committed the crimes he’s charged with now. They also invoke Rule 403, saying the evidence has low probative value, is highly inflammatory, and would result in mini-trials over unrelated allegations, confusing the jury and unfairly prejudicing Combs. At minimum, the defense requests a preliminary hearing to assess the reliability of the evidence before it’s presented at trial.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.213.0.pdf
    Más Menos
    12 m
Todavía no hay opiniones