SafjSmith

Good story, bad narration.

Revisado: 03-14-25

I liked the story, but really hated the narration. Being a Las Vegas resident, when the female narrator says, "Neh vodd aw" when it's pronounced, "Neh vadd uh" is like nails on a chalk board. That's nothing, though, compared to the male narration, who sounds like an elderly special ed teacher. There is nothing sexy about sounding like an octogenarian reading a bedtime story. Hard to get passed that.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Waste of time and money

Revisado: 11-27-24

Female narrator was okay. The male was awful; he sounded bored. The first couple chapters started off interesting, then it devolved into a weird group sex/meal and lost any plot. The writing wasn’t even good at that point. Also, wish I had known it was a reverse harem book - don’t like and wasn’t expecting.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Disappointed

Revisado: 03-14-24

The story sounded fantastic, but the actual telling was boring - how can you make an external Romeo and Juliet love story dull? Even worse, the female narrator made every male voice high pitched and whiny, like a nerdy cartoon character - even Romeo! So obnoxious.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 1 persona

Thankfully it was free.

Revisado: 02-26-24

I can summarize this in three sentences: Girl meets boy, who turns out to be her teacher. They pretend they never met and she stays in his class. After she turns in final, they decide to date. The End.

There is no tension, no flirtation, no longing, just no chemistry. This summary is almost as long as the story. The female narrator was fine, but the male sounded like Mr. Rogers - not sexy at all.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Bad story, bad performance

Revisado: 06-18-23

I couldn't get too far because the main female character was horrible - shallow, selfish, immature, and yet somehow arrogant. She may have had some character growth at some point, but I wouldn't know because the actress who voiced her was so bad, I had to quit. She drug out every last word, like she was too lazy to finish the sentence. If she was trying to talk like Thurston Howell from Gilligan's Island, she nailed it. Unfortunately, the sample was only the man's voice, which I could have lived with,

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 1 persona

Narrator's voice is horrible ....

Revisado: 02-18-23

I really wanted to get into this book. But the narrator's voice, when she voiced the male main character, was so grating that I couldn't listen. She sounded like she was trying to do an impression of Nelson on the Simpsons. You just can't find that remotely romantic. Moreover, although they were in high school, they were extremely shallow. had to give up. wasted time and money.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Mixed feelings - the good, the bad and the ugly...

Revisado: 08-28-17

THE GOOD: writting flows well and has some humorous moments. THE BAD: the hero is controlling and manipulative, and worries more about his feelings than hers - he decides that she cannot stay mad at him after he is done being mad at her (and after he is done punishing her) and after her home is vandalized, he never even asks her how she feels, or consoles her. Separately, they have more issues than National Geographic - at one point, the heroine thinks about how much counseling they will need!? THE UGLY: the narrator cannot do a sexy southern accent to save her life. She makes the hero sound like a drunk Elvis impersonator on ambien, which in case you are wondering is SO NOT ATTRACTIVE.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 1 persona