OYENTE

Banyan

  • 30
  • opiniones
  • 2
  • votos útiles
  • 343
  • calificaciones

Good stories but falls short

Total
4 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
3 out of 5 stars
Historia
4 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 04-14-25

This book sets out to show that the violent revolutionaries were central to India’s fight for independence. I doubt one could show that without taking a broader view of the struggle and offering a theory as to why India became independent. I am left with thinking that the centrality of violent revolution might be an interesting hypothesis, but the book was unable to convince me that they were any more than a fringe (always excepting Bose). In any case, they were, at the least, an interesting fringe.
I found the narratives excessive pauses after each sentence irritating at first, but I almost got used to it by the audiobook’s end.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

A good competent overview of the politics of the 70s.

Total
4 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
4 out of 5 stars
Historia
4 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 04-08-25

This is a straightforward retelling of the liberalization of China. I thought the judgements made by the authors were convincing and the storytelling was good. I have read a lot about this period and I felt a little disappointed that there was not that much new in this retelling, but if you don’t know the story of China in the 1970s, this is a very good place to start.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

A history of governance

Total
4 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
4 out of 5 stars
Historia
4 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 03-25-25

Now that Europe is slowly becoming an expanded version of the Austria-Hungarian Empire, it is increasingly important to understand the original Austria-Hungarian Empire. This book is dry but very informative. The author clearly has a rather favorable view of the empire. At least, he finds it a workable, somewhat attractive alternative to modern nationalism. I am somewhat dubious, but he gives one a lot to think about. Be prepared. There is nothing romantic about this history. It goes into a lot of detail about the relationships between empire, regional government, local government, national and imperial social groups, etc.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

A good start, then disappointment

Total
2 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
3 out of 5 stars
Historia
4 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 03-21-25

This book jerks one around. I was drawn in by the first chapter:a wonderful description of Lagos, Nigeria. That is what I was after: the real Africa. But then there is a long chapter on how pathetic weak and exploited Africa used to be. I was about to go listen to something else. But then there was a chapter attacking the “white savior” industry, so maybe the author wasn’t after my sympathy after all. I stuck around for the next chapter that made fun of Western portrayals of Africa, which deserve the ridicule, but instead of ridiculing bad stuff, I would like some good stuff like in the first chapter. Then there is a chapter complaining about looted African art in Western museums. Someday I hope Africans have the money to buy it back. I would have to know more about the Kingdom of Benin to decide whether I think their old public art should be given to the government that now controls the land the Kingdom once ruled. The next chapter is a lighter one on food and football. Instead of a conclusion, the book ends with a chapter on feminism and civil rights, and then a little on youth culture.
I wanted to read a book on an up-and-coming continent but, judging only from this book, Africa will still need to wallow a couple decades in the muck of indignation before it is ready to stand up and do something interesting. I hope that is not actually true.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Slanted but informative

Total
3 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
4 out of 5 stars
Historia
3 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 03-12-25

Sugar is a capital-intensive industry with a history tangled up in slavery and cartels. It draws anti-capitalist researchers like a sugar bowl draws flies. When the sugar industry grows, it destroys the environment and when it shrinks it throws poor people out of work. The author seems to describe most things done in the industry as exploitive/oppressive/racist…. If one is not a knee-jerk anti-capitalist, one often finds oneself asking with a sigh, is this case an example of bad exploitation/oppression/racism or good exploitation/oppression/racism? Usually there is not enough information on tell. But there is a lot of good information here. I learned a lot

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Not just for Russo-Japanese War nerds.

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
4 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 02-20-25

This explains how the Russian Baltic fleet made its way to the Tsushima slaughter. It gives good insight into the mess that was the Russian imperial government. I found myself getting very interested in the flawed characters. Very well written. If you are that unusual sort of person that thinks they might want to spend a while with the Russo-Japanese War, you might want to pick this up. It is a little light on background information concerning other aspects of the war, so you might want to glance through the Wikipedia article or something like that before starting your listen.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Written by AI?

Total
1 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
4 out of 5 stars
Historia
1 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 01-23-25

At least 75% of this book was a short quirky, often incorrect overview of Eurasian history from Harappa to the fall of the Berlin Wall. Much of the material on Armenians in India are brief descriptions of what is on YouTube. The virtual voice did a pretty good job. I guess it won’t be long until real readers are no longer necessary.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Biased but well written

Total
2 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
2 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 01-07-25

I just listened to and gave a bad review to Revolusi, a book about the Indonesian revolution. That book was very left wing, and this book on the Malaysian insurgency is just as right wing. If you believe Revolusi, 90% of the war crimes were committed by European imperialist, while this book would have you believe that 90% of the war crimes were committed by the Communist insurgents. The two wars were very different, but I suspect the main difference is in the politics of the authors. Although I can’t recommend either book separately , you can read them together for a four-star experience. Each book gives you a good idea what the other book is leaving out. Both authors are preaching to the choir, so to speak—and I guess that is the best way to make money. Although I give the book a low rating due to bias, the author is a good storyteller and I enjoyed the listen. He makes me want to read more on the Malaysian Emergency to get a better idea of what was actually going on.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

In praise of the Indonesian Revolution

Total
2 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
4 out of 5 stars
Historia
3 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 01-05-25

It is hard to find books on this subject, but there must be something out there better than this. This book does contain interesting oral history and seems to start out offering a reasonable left~wing view of Indonesia’s colonial history, but then it fades off into increasingly shrill agit prop. The environmentalist epilogue seems bizarrely out of place. There is too little attempt at understanding and too much virtuous indignation.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Best history of modern Vietnam before 1980

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 01-01-25

This is the best history of Vietnam I have read. It covers all aspects but focuses mainly on politics and culture. It emphasizes the many different views and directions taken by the Vietnamese. Most histories of Vietnam are written as if the center of Vietnam’s history is the war between North Vietnam and the U.S. This history certainly doesn’t ignore the war, but takes a broader view. My only complaint is that the post-1980 coverage is spotty.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_webcro805_stickypopup