Peter

Good story, awful writing

Revisado: 07-07-23

80%of this book is redundant and repetitive. I thought I had skipped backwards over and over again due to the exact same lines being read.

This should have been an autobiography rather than a true crime book. The author talked much more about herself than the victim, or the “perpetrator “ that was never convicted.

there must not have been much evidence because she never spoke of any except a bump on the head, and the fact that she decided he did it. ????? Which he probably did but she’s not a jury.



Just not a good book.
The narrator was great!
The story was interesting but unresolved.
The book was terrible.

Can someone else write this story so it makes sense?
Please and thank you!!

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Great story

Revisado: 03-14-23

I enjoyed this immensely. The interviews and words coming from actual victims and law enforcement were chilling.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

First hand accounts.

Revisado: 02-02-23

If you enjoy reading about someone blowing their own horn and telling you how great they are this book is for you!!
I wanted more case studies but that wasn’t the nature of this book.
If you love Joe Kenda you’ll most likely like this book

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Very slow and repetitive

Revisado: 02-02-23

This book found have been an interesting read but the bocss was is were terrible. Why can’t they just read the book and not change their voice for each character.
I’m not in kindergarten.
Also the book was super repetitive when it finally got to the court case you had already heard all the testimony .
I would not recommend this book on audible .

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 2 personas