OYENTE

M. Gleason

  • 4
  • opiniones
  • 1
  • voto útil
  • 11
  • calificaciones

No compelling evidence of guilt

Total
2 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
4 out of 5 stars
Historia
3 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 05-19-24

I learned some interesting tidbits about the backgrounds of Echols & Baldwin but nothing that points to their guilt beyond what’s widely known. Relies heavily on things Misskelley said during his many ‘confessions’ that are easily explained and/or debunked. World class forensic pathologists have addressed the rape and mutilation claims. I’m always looking for things to challenge my views on things. This one didn’t do it for me. I’m still in the WM3 are innocent camp.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 1 persona

Enjoyed this one

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 05-21-22

All was good and I liked the shorter length. Despite that, this one packs a wallop that I didn’t see coming. No spoilers but you should listen to it.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Narrator kills it a little

Total
4 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
3 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 05-13-22

Christine is my favorite King novel so I had high hopes. The narrator uses too many ‘voices’ and, to me, it’s annoying. He makes LeBay, who is quite sinister, sound like Scooby Doo voiced by Michael J Fox. I often wish the narrators would just read instead of act (like King himself does). In this case, the narrator has a nice voice if he’d just stick to that.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Decent Primer

Total
3 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
3 out of 5 stars
Historia
3 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 02-10-16

Would you recommend this book to a friend? Why or why not?

I would, provided they weren't familiar with the bare essentials of the subject matter.

How would you have changed the story to make it more enjoyable?

I think perhaps a deeper dive into fewer subjects would have been more enjoyable.

What aspect of Peter Jude’s performance would you have changed?

He came across as sarcastic to me.

If this book were a movie would you go see it?

Already covered in many documentaries... in greater depth.

Any additional comments?

I'm not denigrating this work, it's a solid 3 star book. I think it should have included the word 'overview' somewhere in the title.

Also, Redfern seems a HUGE fan of the adverb. At one point I was chuckling at the fact that he managed to get four of them into a single sentence! Right around the middle of the book it's adverb central so be prepared... or should I say listen preparedly?

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_webcro768_stickypopup