After a conviction, many wonder what their next steps should be, and I'm here to provide insight into that very process.

As a practicing attorney with Palmer Legal Defense, I've handled numerous appeals not only in Ohio but in federal and state courts nationwide.

In this episode, I focus on the direct appeal process, which moves directly from the trial court conviction to the court of appeals. I explore what mistakes can be argued based on the trial record, including evidentiary errors and courtroom rulings, and what issues must be saved for other appeals.

So, if you're curious about the legal intricacies post-conviction, stay tuned as I start climbing the direct appeal ladder.

Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.

Recorded at Channel 511.

Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.

Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.

He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.

Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.

For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense.

Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law

What are the potential reasons a lawyer might withdraw from a case, and how do these reasons relate to attorney-client privilege?

With law students Bella Mata and Troy Hendrickson, I discuss the complexities surrounding a lawyer's decision to withdraw from a case. Using a recent high-profile legal situation as a backdrop, the conversation unravels the layers of ethical and moral considerations faced by defense attorneys.

Key Takeaways:

• Ethical Dilemmas: Withdrawal from a case is not always straightforward. Lawyers must navigate complex ethical and moral grounds, ensuring they do not compromise the client's right to effective representation.
• Reasons for Withdrawal: Common reasons include conflicts of interest, financial issues such as non-payment, and personal beliefs or moral conflicts that prevent a lawyer from providing unbiased representation.
• Judge's Role: A court must grant permission for a lawyer to withdraw from a case. The judge's decision is pivotal and can depend on various factors, including the attorney's reason for withdrawal and the potential impact on the client's right to a fair trial.

Key Moments

00:00 Motivations of a Defense Lawyer

05:27 Questioning Legal Fit or Capacity

07:08 Motion to Withdraw Explained

10:30 "Judge Removal Due to Ethics"

14:24 "Rico's Uncertain Trial Status"

Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.

Recorded at Channel 511.

Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.

Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.

He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.

Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.

For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense.

Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law

I tackle a crucial yet often misunderstood aspect of the legal process – the suppression hearing.

After receiving a client question, I break down what a suppression hearing entails, explaining the motions filed to challenge evidence admissibility based on constitutional rights like the Fourth and Fifth Amendments.

I hope you will gain insights into the burden of proof required from the prosecution, the role of the defense, and the strategic importance of evidence such as body cam and dash cam footage.

For anyone facing a DUI/OVI charge or working in the legal field, understanding suppression hearings is pivotal.

Key Takeaways

• What is a Suppression Hearing? I explain the function of a suppression hearing, emphasizing its role in challenging the admissibility of evidence in court. It’s not just legal jargon; understanding it could make a significant difference in the outcome of a case.
• The Legal Process: Learn about the motions filed by defense attorneys seeking to have evidence thrown out. I explain how these motions work and what constitutional violations they might allege, focusing particularly on Fourth and Fifth Amendment rights.
• Burden of Proof: Discover who carries the burden of proof during a suppression hearing and the strategic advantage this provides the defense. I share an anecdote from his early days in law school, highlighting this key aspect.
• Body Cam and Dash Cam Footage: In today's technological age, evidence collection has evolved. I discuss how crucial body cam and dash cam footage have become in presenting or defending a case.
• Real-life Application: Through the lens of an upcoming case I am working on, you will get a firsthand understanding of how these legal principles come into play in real scenarios.

Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.

Recorded at Channel 511.

Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.

Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.

He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.

Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.

For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense.

Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law

In this episode of Lawyer Talk, I am breaking down a hot topic: the Supreme Court case, Snyder vs United States, and a listener's big question on bribery.

Ever wondered what really counts as a bribe? Or how gratuities fit into the whole mix?

I am here to clear up the confusion and make sense of it all, without diving into the political rabbit hole. I talk about how the law defines bribery and why sometimes things aren't as straightforward as they seem.

https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/snyder-v-united-states/

Here are some key takeaways from the discussion:

• Bribery vs. Gratuity: Understand the critical distinctions between a bribe (an influencing payment made before an action) and a gratuity (a gesture of gratitude after an action). The nuances are vital for legal definitions.
• Statutory Interpretation: The importance of accurately interpreting the law is highlighted. In Snyder vs. U.S., the Supreme Court ruled that the conduct didn't fit the statutory definition of bribery under federal law, emphasizing the consequences of prosecutorial decisions.
• Rigorous Ethics Compliance: The conversation sheds light on how strict ethics rules are, especially in legal and government spheres, prohibiting even small gestures like buying a Coke for a public official.

Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!

Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.

Recorded at Channel 511.

Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.

Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.

He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.

Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.

For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense.

Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law

This episode marks a significant milestone as we celebrate our 400th episode. Since our very first recording back in February 2018, so much has changed—from starting with basic equipment in my office to creating the dynamic studio we're in today.

In this episode, we reflect on the journey and evolution of our podcast, from serious legal discussions to casual and fun roundtable talks on crazy news stories.

But onto what they don't teach in law school.

We discuss the real-world topic that uncovers the intersection of media sensationalism and the criminal justice system. Law students Bella Mata, Troy Hendrickson and I explore the captivating case of Luigi and its broader implications within the legal landscape.

From discussing past high-profile cases to understanding the ever-evolving dynamics of courts, justice, and public perception, this episode will challenge what you thought you knew about fairness, justice, and the influence of media on legal proceedings.

Key Moments

00:00 Podcast Milestone: Episode 400 Celebration

05:32 Sensational Trials and Media Impact

07:23 FBI Raids on Trump and Allies

10:53 Surprise Indictment Shocks Defense Attorney

15:14 Lawyer Grandstanding: Egos Over Justice

16:40 Courtroom Strategy for Fair Trial

19:38 Luigi's Dilemma: Villain or Hero?

22:12 "Context Matters in Court Hearings"

27:55 Media Narratives and Legal Ethics

29:49 "Justice System Fairness Debate"

32:35 Demand for Fair Legal Process

Here are some key takeaways -

• Sensationalism vs. Fairness: We examine the impact of media sensationalism on high-profile legal cases and the challenges of ensuring a fair trial amidst public and political scrutiny.
• Managing Media in Legal Cases: I share insights on the importance of effectively communicating with the media, especially during high-publicity cases, to manage public perception and maintain a fair judicial process.
• Complexities of the Justice System: Engaging discussions highlight the complexities and inconsistencies within the justice system, emphasizing that while striving for fairness, real-world application often presents unpredictable challenges.

Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.

Recorded at Channel 511.

Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.

Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.

He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.

Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.

For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense.

Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law

I break down how the state of Ohio's approach to recreational and medical marijuana intersects with OVI laws.

Despite marijuana being legal under state law, driving under the influence remains a legal gray area. I explain the two main types of offenses: operating a vehicle while high and having a prohibited concentration of THC or its metabolites in your system.

With drug recognition experts often under scrutiny for their methods, attorneys challenge these cases while different jurisdictions handle them differently. I offer essential advice on navigating Ohio's tricky landscape of pot-related DUI charges.

And remember, when faced with such charges, getting legal assistance is key.

Key Takeaways:

• Understanding the Law: Like alcohol, marijuana-related OVI can be charged if you're under the influence or have a prohibited concentration of THC/metabolites in your system.
• Proving Influence: It's tricky to prove marijuana impairment since THC can linger. Police use "Drug Recognition Experts" (DREs), but their methods can be challenged.
• Legal Defense: If facing an OVI charge, it's essential to hire a competent Ohio lawyer to navigate the complexities and challenge the evidence effectively.

Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.

Recorded at Channel 511.

Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.

Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.

He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.

Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.

For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense.

Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law

I take you through a thought-provoking discussion on the principles of innocent until proven guilty, especially in light of the Luigi murder case. Whether you're in the legal profession or simply interested in the justice system, there are key takeaways from this episode worth reflecting on.

Here are three pivotal insights:

• Balancing Reality with Legal Principles: I emphasize the necessity of upholding the presumption of innocence in legal practice while acknowledging the real-world instincts about a case. This dual mindset ensures that justice is not only served but perceived with fairness.
• The Role of Criminal Defense Lawyers: Representing seemingly guilty clients is not about agreeing with their actions but ensuring that the law is applied impartially and justly. As I note, this responsibility is crucial for maintaining a just society for all individuals.
• Historical and Cultural Context of Justice: I refer to historical precedents like the dialogue from A Man for All Seasons, illustrating the timeless importance of preserving legal rights, even for those we might naturally oppose.

Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!

Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.

Recorded at Channel 511.

Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.

Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.

He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.

Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.

For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense.

Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law

Join me, Steve Palmer, on Lawyer Talk as I launch a new series, "What's The Appeal?" We're looking into the appellate process from start to finish. Whether you're curious about appeals or simply seeking clarity, this series is for you. Over the next episodes, I'll break down each stage with a big-picture overview and a detailed look at what happens after a conviction and sentencing.

Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.

Recorded at Channel 511.

Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.

Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.

He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.

Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.

For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense.

Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law