The Supremes' Greatest Hits, 2nd Revised & Updated Edition Audiolibro Por Michael G. Trachtman arte de portada

The Supremes' Greatest Hits, 2nd Revised & Updated Edition

The 44 Supreme Court Cases That Most Directly Affect Your Life

Vista previa
Prueba por $0.00
Escucha audiolibros, podcasts y Audible Originals con Audible Plus por un precio mensual bajo.
Escucha en cualquier momento y en cualquier lugar en tus dispositivos con la aplicación gratuita Audible.
Los suscriptores por primera vez de Audible Plus obtienen su primer mes gratis. Cancela la suscripción en cualquier momento.

The Supremes' Greatest Hits, 2nd Revised & Updated Edition

De: Michael G. Trachtman
Narrado por: Jonathan Yen
Prueba por $0.00

Escucha con la prueba gratis de Plus

Compra ahora por $17.19

Compra ahora por $17.19

Confirma la compra
la tarjeta con terminación
Al confirmar tu compra, aceptas las Condiciones de Uso de Audible y el Aviso de Privacidad de Amazon. Impuestos a cobrar según aplique.
Cancelar

Acerca de esta escucha

Can the government seize your house to build a shopping mall? Can it determine what control you have over your own body? Can police search your cellphone?

The answers to those questions come from the Supreme Court, whose rulings have shaped American life and justice and allowed Americans to retain basic freedoms such as privacy, free speech, and the right to a fair trial. Especially relevant in light of Justice Antonin Scalia's passing, as President Obama gears for a fight over nominating his successor, and as we prepare to elect a new president who may get to appoint other justices, the revised and updated edition of Michael G. Trachtman's riveting work includes 10 important cases from 2010 to 2015.

These cases include: Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010), which restricts the right of governments to limit campaign contributions by corporations and unions; Burwell v. Hobby Lobby (2014), which allows a religious exemption from the Affordable Care Act requirement that corporations pay for contraceptive coverage for their employees; Riley v. California (2014), which ruled that police need warrants to search the cellphones of people they arrest; and Obergefell v. Hodges (2015), which ruled that the Constitution guarantees a right to same-sex marriage.

©2016 Michael G. Trachtman (P)2018 Tantor
Américas Derecho Estados Unidos Historia Política y Gobierno Sistemas Judiciales
adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_T1_webcro805_stickypopup
Todas las estrellas
Más relevante  
As a practicing attorney with a keen interest in the impact of constitutional on society, this book is a beautiful helicopter 🚁 view of the evolution of modern US constitutional law. Definitely worth a read.

Enjoyable

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Decision & Listeners do use & enforce. True check & balance.. Lawyers needing interpreting statutes on Amercan🇺🇸Supreme Justice, try it

Import

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Information was given in easy to understand layman terms. The format style made it easy to follow along.

excellent

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

The author’s political/philosophical bent is pretty obvious. I wasn’t anticipating punditry; I was expecting history.

Slanted

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

I was hoping for reasonably objective summaries of 44 Supreme Court decisions. Not really what this book offers.

Dull

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

I really enjoyed the review of the early years of Supreme Court decisions. However, you can pick up the political bias in both the tone of the narrator and words of this book with regard to present controversial decisions. I was looking for an objective narration of these decisions. Overall it was a nice review of great Supreme Court decisions.

Nice review overall.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Not worth the time. Simply an attack on conservative justices. Criticism is one-sided. Obviously you expect critiques of important decisions, but when it is blatantly one-sided it loses all credibility.

First book I stopped midway through

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

I was hoping for a down the middle review of first year Con Law but instead got a rather slanted editorial on many important cases.

Just a but slanted!

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.