
Memory and Authority
The Uses of History in Constitutional Interpretation
No se pudo agregar al carrito
Add to Cart failed.
Error al Agregar a Lista de Deseos.
Error al eliminar de la lista de deseos.
Error al añadir a tu biblioteca
Error al seguir el podcast
Error al dejar de seguir el podcast
3 meses gratis
Compra ahora por $21.49
No default payment method selected.
We are sorry. We are not allowed to sell this product with the selected payment method
-
Narrado por:
-
Jonathan Todd Ross
-
De:
-
Jack M. Balkin
Acerca de esta escucha
Fights over history are at the heart of most important constitutional disputes in America. The Supreme Court's current embrace of originalism is only the most recent example of how lawyers and judges try to use history to establish authority for their positions. Jack M. Balkin argues that fights over constitutional interpretation are often fights over collective memory. Lawyers and judges construct—and erase—memory to lend authority to their present-day views; they make the past speak their values so they can then claim to follow it. The seemingly opposed camps of originalism and living constitutionalism are actually mirror images of a single phenomenon: how lawyers use history to adapt an ancient constitution to a constantly changing world.
Balkin shows how lawyers and judges channel history through standard forms of legal argument that shape how they use history and even what they see in history. He explains how lawyers and judges invoke history selectively to construct authority for their claims and undermine the authority of opposing views. And he elucidates the perpetual quarrel between historians and lawyers, showing how the two can best join issue in legal disputes. This book is a sweeping rethinking of the uses of history in constitutional interpretation.
©2024 Jack M. Balkin (P)2024 TantorLos oyentes también disfrutaron...
-
Against Constitutional Originalism
- A Historical Critique
- De: Jonathan Gienapp
- Narrado por: Josh Innerst
- Duración: 11 h y 37 m
- Versión completa
-
General
-
Narración:
-
Historia
Constitutional originalism stakes law to history. The theory's core tenet—that the United States Constitution should be interpreted according to its original meaning—has us decide questions of modern constitutional law by consulting the distant constitutional past. Yet originalist engagement with history is often deeply problematic. In this comprehensive and novel critique of originalism, Jonathan Gienapp targets originalists' unspoken assumptions about the Constitution and its history.
-
-
Constitutional Originalism is judicial chicanery
- De marwalk en 11-24-24
De: Jonathan Gienapp
-
The Eurasian Century
- Hot Wars, Cold Wars, and the Making of the Modern Century
- De: Hal Brands
- Narrado por: Tim Fannon
- Duración: 11 h y 33 m
- Versión completa
-
General
-
Narración:
-
Historia
Hal Brands argues that a better understanding of Eurasia's strategic geography can illuminate the contours of rivalry and conflict in today's world. The Eurasian Century explains how revolutions in technology and warfare, and the rise of toxic ideologies of conquest, made Eurasia the center of twentieth-century geopolitics—with pressing implications for the struggles that will define the twenty-first.
-
-
Worth the read.
- De Chip Eckert en 02-24-25
De: Hal Brands
-
Lawless
- How the Supreme Court Runs on Conservative Grievance, Fringe Theories, and Bad Vibes
- De: Leah Litman
- Narrado por: Leah Litman
- Duración: 7 h y 53 m
- Versión completa
-
General
-
Narración:
-
Historia
With the gravitas of Joan Biskupic and the irreverence of Elie Mystal, Leah Litman brings her signature wit to the question of what’s gone wrong at One First Street. In Lawless, she argues that the Supreme Court is no longer practicing law; it’s running on vibes. By “vibes,” Litman means legal-ish claims that repackage the politics of conservative grievance and dress them up in robes. Major decisions adopt the language and posture of the law, while in fact displaying a commitment to protecting a single minority: the religious conservatives and Republican officials.
-
-
Read This Book
- De Dennis & Angela Boehm en 07-09-25
De: Leah Litman
-
No Democracy Lasts Forever
- How the Constitution Threatens the United States
- De: Erwin Chemerinsky
- Narrado por: Daniel Thomas May
- Duración: 7 h y 23 m
- Versión completa
-
General
-
Narración:
-
Historia
No Democracy Lasts Forever argues that the Constitution has become a threat to American democracy and must be dramatically changed or replaced if secession is to be avoided. Deeply troubled by the Constitution's inherent flaws, Erwin Chemerinsky, the renowned dean of Berkeley law school, came to the sobering conclusion that our nearly 250-year-old founding document is responsible for the crisis now facing American democracy.
-
-
Leftist, but he makes sense to me
- De Mike Liveright en 11-29-24
-
Milton Friedman
- The Last Conservative
- De: Jennifer Burns
- Narrado por: Nan McNamara
- Duración: 18 h y 52 m
- Versión completa
-
General
-
Narración:
-
Historia
Milton Friedman was, alongside John Maynard Keynes, the most influential economist of the twentieth century. His work was instrumental in the turn toward free markets that defined the 1980s, and his full-throated defenses of capitalism and freedom resonated with audiences around the world. It’s no wonder the last decades of the twentieth century have been called “the Age of Friedman”—or that analysts have sought to hold him responsible for both the rising prosperity and the social ills of recent times. Historian Jennifer Burns tells Friedman’s extraordinary story with the nuance it deserves.
-
-
No mention of Thomas Sowell Phd
- De Charles en 12-26-23
De: Jennifer Burns
-
Reading the Constitution
- Why I Chose Pragmatism, Not Textualism
- De: Stephen Breyer
- Narrado por: Stephen Breyer
- Duración: 12 h y 16 m
- Versión completa
-
General
-
Narración:
-
Historia
The relatively new judicial philosophy of textualism dominates the Supreme Court. Textualists claim that the right way to interpret the Constitution and statutes is to read the text carefully and examine the language as it was understood at the time the documents were written. This, however, is not Justice Breyer’s philosophy nor has it been the traditional way to interpret the Constitution since the time of Chief Justice John Marshall. Justice Breyer recalls Marshall’s exhortation that the Constitution must be a workable set of principles to be interpreted by subsequent generations.
-
-
Very Annoying Narration
- De Minnie I. en 04-21-24
De: Stephen Breyer
-
Against Constitutional Originalism
- A Historical Critique
- De: Jonathan Gienapp
- Narrado por: Josh Innerst
- Duración: 11 h y 37 m
- Versión completa
-
General
-
Narración:
-
Historia
Constitutional originalism stakes law to history. The theory's core tenet—that the United States Constitution should be interpreted according to its original meaning—has us decide questions of modern constitutional law by consulting the distant constitutional past. Yet originalist engagement with history is often deeply problematic. In this comprehensive and novel critique of originalism, Jonathan Gienapp targets originalists' unspoken assumptions about the Constitution and its history.
-
-
Constitutional Originalism is judicial chicanery
- De marwalk en 11-24-24
De: Jonathan Gienapp
-
The Eurasian Century
- Hot Wars, Cold Wars, and the Making of the Modern Century
- De: Hal Brands
- Narrado por: Tim Fannon
- Duración: 11 h y 33 m
- Versión completa
-
General
-
Narración:
-
Historia
Hal Brands argues that a better understanding of Eurasia's strategic geography can illuminate the contours of rivalry and conflict in today's world. The Eurasian Century explains how revolutions in technology and warfare, and the rise of toxic ideologies of conquest, made Eurasia the center of twentieth-century geopolitics—with pressing implications for the struggles that will define the twenty-first.
-
-
Worth the read.
- De Chip Eckert en 02-24-25
De: Hal Brands
-
Lawless
- How the Supreme Court Runs on Conservative Grievance, Fringe Theories, and Bad Vibes
- De: Leah Litman
- Narrado por: Leah Litman
- Duración: 7 h y 53 m
- Versión completa
-
General
-
Narración:
-
Historia
With the gravitas of Joan Biskupic and the irreverence of Elie Mystal, Leah Litman brings her signature wit to the question of what’s gone wrong at One First Street. In Lawless, she argues that the Supreme Court is no longer practicing law; it’s running on vibes. By “vibes,” Litman means legal-ish claims that repackage the politics of conservative grievance and dress them up in robes. Major decisions adopt the language and posture of the law, while in fact displaying a commitment to protecting a single minority: the religious conservatives and Republican officials.
-
-
Read This Book
- De Dennis & Angela Boehm en 07-09-25
De: Leah Litman
-
No Democracy Lasts Forever
- How the Constitution Threatens the United States
- De: Erwin Chemerinsky
- Narrado por: Daniel Thomas May
- Duración: 7 h y 23 m
- Versión completa
-
General
-
Narración:
-
Historia
No Democracy Lasts Forever argues that the Constitution has become a threat to American democracy and must be dramatically changed or replaced if secession is to be avoided. Deeply troubled by the Constitution's inherent flaws, Erwin Chemerinsky, the renowned dean of Berkeley law school, came to the sobering conclusion that our nearly 250-year-old founding document is responsible for the crisis now facing American democracy.
-
-
Leftist, but he makes sense to me
- De Mike Liveright en 11-29-24
-
Milton Friedman
- The Last Conservative
- De: Jennifer Burns
- Narrado por: Nan McNamara
- Duración: 18 h y 52 m
- Versión completa
-
General
-
Narración:
-
Historia
Milton Friedman was, alongside John Maynard Keynes, the most influential economist of the twentieth century. His work was instrumental in the turn toward free markets that defined the 1980s, and his full-throated defenses of capitalism and freedom resonated with audiences around the world. It’s no wonder the last decades of the twentieth century have been called “the Age of Friedman”—or that analysts have sought to hold him responsible for both the rising prosperity and the social ills of recent times. Historian Jennifer Burns tells Friedman’s extraordinary story with the nuance it deserves.
-
-
No mention of Thomas Sowell Phd
- De Charles en 12-26-23
De: Jennifer Burns
-
Reading the Constitution
- Why I Chose Pragmatism, Not Textualism
- De: Stephen Breyer
- Narrado por: Stephen Breyer
- Duración: 12 h y 16 m
- Versión completa
-
General
-
Narración:
-
Historia
The relatively new judicial philosophy of textualism dominates the Supreme Court. Textualists claim that the right way to interpret the Constitution and statutes is to read the text carefully and examine the language as it was understood at the time the documents were written. This, however, is not Justice Breyer’s philosophy nor has it been the traditional way to interpret the Constitution since the time of Chief Justice John Marshall. Justice Breyer recalls Marshall’s exhortation that the Constitution must be a workable set of principles to be interpreted by subsequent generations.
-
-
Very Annoying Narration
- De Minnie I. en 04-21-24
De: Stephen Breyer