• The Federalist Society, part 4: How to Fight Back

  • Feb 13 2024
  • Duración: 1 h y 17 m
  • Podcast
  • 2.0 out of 5 stars (1 calificación)

The Federalist Society, part 4: How to Fight Back

  • Resumen

  • Let's burn this motherfucker down metaphorically speaking OF COURSE! Today we're talking about how to counter Fed Soc's influence on campus and in the courts. The game plan isn't to copy their strategy - it's to play to the left's strengths.


    Thank you so much for supporting 5-4 with your Premium subscription. You make work like this possible!


    This episode features Amanda Hollis-Brusky, author of Ideas with Consequences: The Federalist Society and the Conservative Counterrevolution (Oxford University Press, 2019), and Molly Coleman, co-founder of People's Parity Project https://peoplesparity.org/.


    5-4 is presented by Prologue Projects. Rachel Ward is our producer. Leon Neyfakh and Andrew Parsons provide editorial support. Our researcher is Jonathan DeBruin, and our website was designed by Peter Murphy. Our artwork is by Teddy Blanks at Chips NY, and our theme song is by Spatial Relations.


    Follow the show at @fivefourpod on most platforms. On Twitter, find Peter @The_Law_Boy and Rhiannon @AywaRhiannon.

    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

    Más Menos
adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_webcro805_stickypopup

Lo que los oyentes dicen sobre The Federalist Society, part 4: How to Fight Back

Calificaciones medias de los clientes
Total
  • 2 out of 5 stars
  • 5 estrellas
    0
  • 4 estrellas
    0
  • 3 estrellas
    0
  • 2 estrellas
    1
  • 1 estrella
    0
Ejecución
  • 3 out of 5 stars
  • 5 estrellas
    0
  • 4 estrellas
    0
  • 3 estrellas
    1
  • 2 estrellas
    0
  • 1 estrella
    0
Historia
  • 1 out of 5 stars
  • 5 estrellas
    0
  • 4 estrellas
    0
  • 3 estrellas
    0
  • 2 estrellas
    0
  • 1 estrella
    1

Reseñas - Selecciona las pestañas a continuación para cambiar el origen de las reseñas.

Ordenar por:
Filtrar por:
  • Total
    2 out of 5 stars
  • Ejecución
    3 out of 5 stars
  • Historia
    1 out of 5 stars

cancel culture

I generally love the podcast and listen to all of them. This one was particularly concerning though as it calls for the canceling of all debate and friendships simply because of their association or legal ideology. The answer presented wasn't to provide more debate but to simply shut it down. Remove friends from your life/give them ultimatums. key people's cars because of their legal thought process. Dangerous.

This one, like many others, continues to state Crowe has had a case in front of the US Supreme Court, which has been proven untrue many times. It also criticizes recusal for judges subject to the rule of necessity yet leaves out any mention of the same actions by judges not subject to the rule (Merchan's 1 step relative receiving compensation, or, more directly, violation of the judicial code of ethics but refusal to recuse on the appearance of impropriety).

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña