• SCOTUS’s Endless Beef with the EPA

  • Oct 21 2024
  • Duración: 1 h y 4 m
  • Podcast
  • 2.0 out of 5 stars (1 calificación)

SCOTUS’s Endless Beef with the EPA

Escúchala gratis

Ver detalles del espectáculo

  • Resumen

  • Melissa, Kate, and Leah recap October at the Supreme Court, diving into the sewage-infested waters of City and County of San Francisco v. Environmental Protection Agency. What did clean water ever do to Brett Kavanaugh? Also recapped: cases about the judicial review of immigration visas and veterans benefits. Finally, the hosts finish off with a peek at what’s going on in state courts around the country.

    Get tickets for STRICT SCRUTINY LIVE – The Bad Decisions Tour 2025!

    • 5/31 – Washington DC
    • 6/12 – NYC
    • 10/4 – Chicago

    Learn more: http://crooked.com/events

    Pre-order your copy of Leah's forthcoming book, Lawless: How the Supreme Court Runs on Conservative Grievance, Fringe Theories, and Bad Vibes (out May 13th)

    Follow us on Instagram, Threads, and Bluesky
    Más Menos
Más Menos
adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_webcro805_stickypopup

Lo que los oyentes dicen sobre SCOTUS’s Endless Beef with the EPA

Calificaciones medias de los clientes
Total
  • 2 out of 5 stars
  • 5 estrellas
    0
  • 4 estrellas
    0
  • 3 estrellas
    0
  • 2 estrellas
    1
  • 1 estrella
    0
Ejecución
  • 4 out of 5 stars
  • 5 estrellas
    0
  • 4 estrellas
    1
  • 3 estrellas
    0
  • 2 estrellas
    0
  • 1 estrella
    0
Historia
  • 1 out of 5 stars
  • 5 estrellas
    0
  • 4 estrellas
    0
  • 3 estrellas
    0
  • 2 estrellas
    0
  • 1 estrella
    1

Reseñas - Selecciona las pestañas a continuación para cambiar el origen de las reseñas.

Reseñas de Audible.com

Opiniones de Amazon
Ordenar por:
Filtrar por:
  • Total
    2 out of 5 stars
  • Ejecución
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Historia
    1 out of 5 stars
Imagen de perfil para DRobinson

biased

As a general rule, I appreciate the approach and framing as many times they are a fair representation of the case's oral argument. even if skewed, it's accurate.

This week's presentation of the EPA case seemingly relies on 15 second clips posted to Twitter and out of context. It doesn't convey the majority argument, even if they disagree with it, and doesn't explain to the listener why there are concerns.

At one point, they suggest the justices were calling for the end of the EPA solely because they asked the agency a question about torts. A complete attempt to mislead.

Denunciar

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña