In this conversation, Richard Gage, a renowned architect, discusses the events of 9/11, focusing particularly on the collapse of Building 7. He challenges the official narrative provided by NIST, presenting evidence that suggests controlled demolition rather than fire caused the building's collapse. Gage highlights eyewitness accounts of explosions, the role of thermite, and the destruction of evidence in the aftermath. He also explores the broader implications of 9/11, including motivations behind the attacks and their impact on global politics.

takeaways

• 9/11 was a pivotal event that shaped global politics.
• Building 7's collapse is often overlooked but crucial to understanding 9/11.
• The official narrative of the collapse is challenged by evidence of controlled demolition.
• Eyewitness accounts report explosions prior to the collapse of the buildings.
• Thermite may have been used in the demolition of the buildings.
• The destruction of evidence post-9/11 raises serious concerns about the investigation.
• Many architects and engineers demand a new investigation into 9/11.
• The motivations behind 9/11 include geopolitical and economic factors.
• The narrative of 9/11 has parallels with other global events, including COVID-19.
• Public awareness and critical thinking are essential in understanding historical events.

titles

• Unraveling 9/11: The Truth Behind Building 7
• The Collapse of Building 7: A Controlled Demolition?

Sound Bites

• "The building came down at freefall."
• "Molten iron was found in the debris."
• "There was no plane that hit Building 7."

Chapters

00:00
Introduction to 9/11 and Its Implications

02:56
The Collapse of Building 7: An Overview

10:38
Investigating the Official Narrative

18:16
Witness Accounts and Explosions

30:40
Thermite and the Evidence

43:27
Conclusion: Call for a New Investigation

45:06
Introduction to the Film Series on 9/11

46:45
Exploring the Mechanics of Building Collapse

48:22
Theories of Collapse: NIST vs. Controlled Demolition

52:26
Eyewitness Accounts of Explosions

55:32
Symmetry and Asymmetry in the Collapse

01:01:28
The Role of Concrete in the Collapse

01:04:33
Access and Preparation for Demolition

01:10:47
Destruction of Evidence and Its Implications

01:14:32
Motivations Behind 9/11: A Broader Perspective

01:17:14
Parallels Between 9/11 and COVID-19

01:20:23
YOUTUBE - OUTRO (NEW).mp4

Visit us at RichardGage911.org

Support the show

See Ep. 1 & 2, and visit our website at RichardGage911.org

Support the show

Bringing Tens of Thousands of Newcomers to the 9/11 Truth | Watch Along with Them! — 45 Minutes

Jimmy Dore posted today our LIVE interview with him from the other day! He encouraged us to share all the evidence we could in our limited time with him, and we did!

I was joined by structural engineer Kamal Obeid from Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth who addressed key issues including the impossibility of the free-fall collapse of World Trade Center Building 7.

We addressed as many key points as we possibly could in the 45 minutes that we had:

• The importance of the truth-telling that WI Senator Ron Johnson and former Congressman Curt Weldon are all about right now. Jimmy played excerpts of the Senator’s WTC comments on The Benny Show including “molten metal…controlled demolition…Calling Out Bravo 7 documentary.” We are making sure that the Senator has the solid body of evidence that will back up his historic efforts to get a real 9/11 investigation. The more you help us, the more we can help the VIP’s who have the courage to speak out!

We addressed these questions among many others on Jimmy Dore:

• Why didn’t the American Institute of Architects issue even one bulletin on the catastrophic unprecedented destruction of 47-story World Trade Center Building 7 — the third worst structural failure in history?
• Why didn’t NIST (National Institute of Standards & Technology) include in their 2004 report on the Twin Towers the 156 first responders who saw, heard, and experienced explosions? And, many of them before the collapse of the towers?
• Why did NIST persist with their theory that the top section crushed the building section below while maintaining a near free-fall acceleration (when the top section was in fact destroyed in the first 3 seconds) — as if 90% of the steel gave no resistance whatsoever?
• What caused the hundreds of laterally-ejected freely-flying 4-ton structural steel sections, at 80mph, landing 600 feet in every direction impaling themselves in skyscrapers all around them?
• What cause the complete pulverization of 110 acre-sized concrete floors — 90,000 tons of concrete in each tower, and dispersed it from river to river across Lower Manhattan?
• What was crushing the lower section of each tower, if the above steel and concrete, which was 2/3 of their weight, was NOT even available to crush it?!

The above questions were just the beginning of the 7-dozen key points of forensic, video, and eyewitness testimony we laid on Jimmy. Please let us know how you think we did. There’s always room for improvement.

Visit us at RichardGage911.org

Support the show