• Quick Bits: Baldwin Dismissal Motion. Hannah Gutierrez wants a New Trial, and was Kouri Richins' Mom involved in the death of her husband?

  • Mar 25 2024
  • Duración: 18 m
  • Podcast
  • 1.0 out of 5 stars (1 calificación)

Quick Bits: Baldwin Dismissal Motion. Hannah Gutierrez wants a New Trial, and was Kouri Richins' Mom involved in the death of her husband?

Escúchala gratis

Ver detalles del espectáculo

  • Resumen

  • Control Body Odor ANYWHERE with @lumedeodorant and get $5 off of your Starter Pack (that’s over 40% off) with promo code EDBQB at https://lumedeodorant.com ! #lumepod #ad

    Alec Baldwin has filed a motion to dismiss the grand jury indictment claiming an error with the jury instructions. It is also revealed that the prosecution offered Bladwin the same plea deal given to Dave Halls - six months of unsupervised probation and a misdemeanor charge. But in a curious turn of events, the prosecution withdrew the offer 10 days before the offer expired and indicted him.

    Hannah Gutierrez has filed a new trial motion because of a New Mexico Supreme Court decision unrelated to her case. The prosecution responded to the motion and a hearing has been set for Friday, March 29th. I will cover it on my long-form channel.

    Kouri Richins’ warrant was unsealed. There was speculation that her mother helped plan Eric Richins’ murder. There will be a Preliminary Hearing on May 15th.

    Lastly, there was a breakdown of a Bryan Kohberger hearing from February 28th. It consisted mainly of discovery status and scheduling deadlines. No trial date has been scheduled yet. A hearing for the Motion for Change of Venue has been scheduled for May 14th.



    This podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis:

    Spotify Ad Analytics - https://www.spotify.com/us/legal/ad-analytics-privacy-policy/
    Podscribe - https://podscribe.com/privacy
    Más Menos
Más Menos
adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_webcro805_stickypopup

Lo que los oyentes dicen sobre Quick Bits: Baldwin Dismissal Motion. Hannah Gutierrez wants a New Trial, and was Kouri Richins' Mom involved in the death of her husband?

Calificaciones medias de los clientes
Total
  • 1 out of 5 stars
  • 5 estrellas
    0
  • 4 estrellas
    0
  • 3 estrellas
    0
  • 2 estrellas
    0
  • 1 estrella
    1
Ejecución
  • 3 out of 5 stars
  • 5 estrellas
    0
  • 4 estrellas
    0
  • 3 estrellas
    1
  • 2 estrellas
    0
  • 1 estrella
    0
Historia
  • 4 out of 5 stars
  • 5 estrellas
    0
  • 4 estrellas
    1
  • 3 estrellas
    0
  • 2 estrellas
    0
  • 1 estrella
    0

Reseñas - Selecciona las pestañas a continuación para cambiar el origen de las reseñas.

Reseñas de Audible.com

Opiniones de Amazon
Ordenar por:
Filtrar por:
  • Total
    1 out of 5 stars
  • Ejecución
    3 out of 5 stars
  • Historia
    4 out of 5 stars
Imagen de perfil para JAM

Misinformation equates to dismissing all

Emily states that someone on her YT video stated that the amount of data in the Rust case is greater than twice the amount of data in the Library of Congress. This immediately seemed incorrect, and it absolutely IS incorrect information. Which makes me apply the trial/witness standard of if one thing they are stating as fact is not a fact, then one can disregard their entire testimony. This is not testimony, but given Emily is a former prosecutor and lays her claim to fame at being a 17+ year attorney distilling “facts not f-c-e-ry” for her audience, this is really a low bar for “fact checking”. The Library of Congress website clearly states that currently they have 74 Terabytes online and available, but that is a SMALL FRACTION of what they need to digitize, which they anticipate will be in the many PETABYTES realm.

I have listened to EDB for years and generally enjoy her wit and her “facts”, but lately she seems to have lots of slip ups with regard to facts (she read the Alec Baldwin sanctions request as though it was his case dismissal request for well over an hour in a live broadcast before she was alerted repeatedly by LawNerds watching that she was not actually reading the dismissal request after all!!!)..as well as just being away from broadcasting more & more so she can follow DMB as well as attend multiple Real Housewives junkets. She clearly has lots of time & money to spend, so maybe spend more time gathering facts before telling your audiences about relying on you to distill facts from f-c-e-ry. I hope she reads this and actually takes it to heart, especially since I am a long-time listener/watcher and have plenty of LawNerd and PawNerd merch to prove it.

Denunciar

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña