• Question 27: Can the enemies of God serve the purposes of the Gospel?

  • Sep 22 2020
  • Duración: 6 m
  • Podcast
  • 1.0 out of 5 stars (1 calificación)

Question 27: Can the enemies of God serve the purposes of the Gospel?

Escúchala gratis

Ver detalles del espectáculo

  • Resumen

  • It is becoming increasingly intimidating to openly profess faith in Christ. A faithful witness of the Lord Jesus or an open profession of the truths of the Bible can have serious consequences, not only if living in an Islamic or Communist State, but in the West, where religious freedom was at one time considered a pillar of democracy. But, as always, when God's children suffer oppression from the world, God is at work.
    Más Menos
Más Menos
adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_webcro805_stickypopup

Lo que los oyentes dicen sobre Question 27: Can the enemies of God serve the purposes of the Gospel?

Calificaciones medias de los clientes
Total
  • 1 out of 5 stars
  • 5 estrellas
    0
  • 4 estrellas
    0
  • 3 estrellas
    0
  • 2 estrellas
    0
  • 1 estrella
    1
Ejecución
  • 1 out of 5 stars
  • 5 estrellas
    0
  • 4 estrellas
    0
  • 3 estrellas
    0
  • 2 estrellas
    0
  • 1 estrella
    1
Historia
  • 1 out of 5 stars
  • 5 estrellas
    0
  • 4 estrellas
    0
  • 3 estrellas
    0
  • 2 estrellas
    0
  • 1 estrella
    1

Reseñas - Selecciona las pestañas a continuación para cambiar el origen de las reseñas.

Reseñas de Audible.com

Opiniones de Amazon
Ordenar por:
Filtrar por:
  • Total
    1 out of 5 stars
  • Ejecución
    1 out of 5 stars
  • Historia
    1 out of 5 stars
Imagen de perfil para rainjade

WHY "RESPECTABLE" SINS NEVER MATTER

Because women who love women are apparently the hideous nadir and utter downfall of morality and humanity, not the never publicly called out "respectable" sins of pride, gluttony, lust, envy, greed, lying, selfishness, hypocrisy, self-righteousness, anger, and all the rest, like male sexual violence. Because then you'd have to look inward at yourselves instead of outward toward we who hurt no one in loving women.

Aside from pagan fertility orgy rituals mentioned in Romans 1:26, there is ZERO mention of women-loving women. Both 1 Corinthians 6:9 and 1 Timothy 1:10 SPECIFICALLY speak of men having sex, NOT women. Modern translations replaced the KJV's correct rending of the original Greek text "arsenokoitai" references with "homosexuals," in order to be able to include and condemn sex between women alongside that of sex between men. Women/women sex was NOT prohibited in Mosaic, i.e. Levitical / Deuteronomy laws, only men/men sex. Why? Because men/men sex was associated not with love but with humiliation, shame, conquest, violence, force, coercion, war. Sorry, can't claim women's inclusion where not included, just because you want to. And no, it cannot be taken for granted that women / women would be similarly assumed: women do not commit bestiality, and yet that repulsive male act of sexual violence *was* explicitly condemned for both men AND for women in Leviticus / Deuteronomy. Both sexes are specifically spelled out, despite it being solely a male sexual act. It is inconceivable that sex between women would have gone unmentioned if it was meant to be condemned as sin alongside sexual acts between men.

Regardless, women actually *loving* women isn't even conceived of, let alone addressed biblically.

Worry about publicly denouncing all the "respectable" sins that actually ARE the nadir & downfall of humanity, ESPECIALLY public figures & those in leadership or political roles.

You sounding brass. You strain at a gnat, and swallow a camel.

Denunciar

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña