58. Precision agriculture: farming on steroids, or boon to conservation? (Mark McConnell)
No se pudo agregar al carrito
Add to Cart failed.
Error al Agregar a Lista de Deseos.
Error al eliminar de la lista de deseos.
Error al añadir a tu biblioteca
Error al seguir el podcast
Error al dejar de seguir el podcast
58. Precision agriculture: farming on steroids, or boon to conservation? (Mark McConnell)
-
Narrado por:
-
De:
Acerca de esta escucha
The term "precision agriculture" has high-tech and “big ag.” connotations, and is usually not associated with biodiversity. But there is a strong argument to be made that it is one of the best things that has happened to conservation in recent decades. Agriculture remains the biggest driver of biodiversity loss in most parts of the world, so anything that reduces its impact might be worth taking note of.
Mark McConnell, an assistant professor at Mississippi State University, joins us on this episode to explain why precision agriculture is a boon for conservation. We also talk about the accompanying concept of precision conservation, which he has been promoting, as well as the old “land sharing versus land sparing” debate. For listeners unfamiliar with that debate, check the podcast notes for a couple of key references, as well as some of Mark’s work.
Links to resources:
- What conservationists need to know about farming - early (2012) paper by Balmford and co-authors on the land sharing versus land sparing debate
- Precision Conservation to Enhance Wildlife Benefits in Agricultural Landscapes - 2017 book chapter by Mark and a co-author
- Gamebird University - Mark's podcast
Visit www.case4conservation.com