
The Vitamin D-ilemma: Are the New Guidelines Missing the Mark?
No se pudo agregar al carrito
Add to Cart failed.
Error al Agregar a Lista de Deseos.
Error al eliminar de la lista de deseos.
Error al añadir a tu biblioteca
Error al seguir el podcast
Error al dejar de seguir el podcast
-
Narrado por:
-
De:
Acerca de esta escucha
Vitamin D recommendations in 1941 began this debate. Over the years, updated guidelines have continued to spark controversy and debate in the field of vitamin D research.
In this episode of Daily Value, we look at the recent “Vitamin D-ilemma” reinvigorated by the Endocrine Society's updated 2024 guidelines. These new recommendations have dialed back routine testing and supplementation targets, igniting pushback from leading researchers who argue we might be overlooking significant health benefits (including reduced risks for 8 out of the top 10 leading causes of death). Join us as we Look at the evolving science behind vitamin D, why randomized trials and observational studies seem to tell different stories, and how you can practically navigate these conflicting recommendations to optimize your own health.
00:00 Introduction: The Vitamin D Controversy
01:00 Historical Guidelines and Shifts
01:54 The 2011 Guidelines and Their Impact
03:57 The 2024 Update: A New Debate
06:13 Understanding Vitamin D's Role in the Body
07:29 Clinical Trials vs. Observational Studies
09:13 Health Benefits of Higher Vitamin D Levels
11:58 Challenges in Vitamin D Research
15:56 Practical Recommendations for Optimal Vitamin D
19:32 Conclusion: Striving for Optimal Health
PMID: 39861407
PMID: 38828961
PMID: 37004709
PMID: 30992519
Support the show