In Part 2 of our two-part deep dive into the Baseline Killer case, we pick up where the chaos left off—when fear turned into focused pursuit.

As Phoenix police narrowed in on a suspect, what followed was a complex legal battle that included multiple trials, a deeply scrutinized investigation, and a courtroom saga that kept the public on edge.

In this episode, we break down:

• The arrest that ended the reign of terror
• The separate trials and how prosecutors built their case
• The conclusion of a legal battle years in the making
• A critical review of the trial strategy, outcome, and public reaction

Was justice truly served? Or did the process leave behind more questions than answers?

Join us as we close the chapter on one of Arizona’s most disturbing true crime stories—and examine what justice really looked like in the aftermath.

In this episode, we plunge headfirst into the terrifying saga of the Baseline Killer—a violent predator who turned Phoenix into a city gripped by fear.

Between 2005 and 2006, this elusive figure committed a series of brutal crimes: sexual assaults, kidnappings, and murders that left neighborhoods paralyzed. No one knew where he would strike next, or why.

In Part 1 of this two-part series, we cover:

• The haunting timeline of the Baseline Killer’s attacks
• The key victims and how their lives were forever changed
• The rising panic as a city lived in the shadow of a faceless threat
• The early missteps and challenges in the investigation

As the terror unfolded, Phoenix residents were forced to confront a nightmare that seemed to have no end.

Stay tuned—in Part 2, we reveal how police finally unmasked the fear.

The Harold Fish Case – A Fatal Hike in Arizona

In this gripping episode, we dive into one of Arizona’s most controversial self-defense cases: the 2004 shooting of Grant Kuenzli by retired schoolteacher Harold Fish.

What started as a peaceful solo hike in the Coconino National Forest turned deadly within minutes. Fish claimed he was forced to fire in self-defense after being charged by Kuenzli, who had aggressively confronted him—following a dispute over two unleashed dogs.

Fish was convicted of second-degree murder in 2006 and sentenced to a decade in prison. But years later, that conviction was overturned. What changed? And what does this case tell us about the justice system, gun rights, and the ever-blurry line between self-defense and excessive force?

In this episode, we explore:

• The facts and timeline of the shooting
• The prosecution's theory vs. the defense's strategy
• The role of Kuenzli’s dogs—and their impact on the case
• The trial, conviction, and the appeal that reversed it all
• How this case helped reshape self-defense laws in Arizona

Was this truly a justified shooting? Or a deadly overreaction?

Tune in as we unpack the legal, moral, and societal implications of the Harold Fish case—and why it still sparks debate two decades later.