
Genetic Testing in Depression: Promises and Precaution
No se pudo agregar al carrito
Add to Cart failed.
Error al Agregar a Lista de Deseos.
Error al eliminar de la lista de deseos.
Error al añadir a tu biblioteca
Error al seguir el podcast
Error al dejar de seguir el podcast
-
Narrado por:
-
De:
If you are in crisis, please call 911 or call, text or chat with the Suicide and Crisis Lifeline at 988, or contact the Crisis Text Line by texting TALK to 741741, or visit https://988lifeline.org/.The 988 Lifeline is available 24/7/365. YOUR CONVERSATIONS ARE FREE AND CONFIDENTIAL.
Genetic Testing in Depression: Promises, Pitfalls, and the Path Forward
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.16113884
ABSTRACT
This podcast episode explores the growing field of genetic testing in depression—unpacking both its exciting promises and sobering limitations. It delves into how pharmacogenomics (PGX) and polygenic risk scores (PRS) are being marketed to personalize antidepressant treatment and predict risk for major depressive disorder (MDD). We examine the strength (and weakness) of current scientific evidence, regulatory positions from the FDA and APA, and the real-world clinical impact—or lack thereof—seen in major studies like GUIDED and PRIMECARE. The episode also tackles the ethical dilemmas of data privacy, discrimination, and informed consent, especially as these tools edge closer to mainstream psychiatry. Ultimately, the conversation calls for caution, equity, and evidence-based integration of these powerful technologies.
CLINICS & SERVICES
Book an appointment:
https://appointments.conciercare.net/#/400NeurologyService
Read more in the CONCIERCARE newsroom:
https://health.conciercare.net/news/post/10.5281.cjmg.16240973
OBJECTIVES
1. What is the current role of genetic factors in major depressive disorder (MDD)?
2. How do pharmacogenomic (PGX) tests aim to guide antidepressant selection and dosing?
3. What does the evidence say about the clinical utility of PGX testing, especially from studies like GUIDED and PRIMECARE?
4. How do polygenic risk scores (PRS) work, and why are they not yet ready for clinical prediction in individuals?
5. What do major regulatory and psychiatric bodies like the FDA and APA recommend regarding these tests?
6. Why is transparency in test algorithms and independent funding critical to trust and clinical adoption?
7. What ethical, legal, and social risks do genetic tests in psychiatry pose—particularly regarding stigma, insurance, and family privacy?
8. How might future advances in systems biology and multi-omics bring us closer to truly personalized psychiatric care?
Join the conversation—Have questions or thoughts about genetic testing for depression? Share them in the comments below.
ABOUT US
CONCIERCARE is a patient-first health system working at the intersection of medicine, ethics, and innovation. Learn more at: https://health.conciercare.net
COPYRIGHT & DISCLAIMER
https://health.conciercare.net/news/post/10.5281.cjmg.16240973 - Funding & Ethical Disclosures
#GeneticTesting, #Pharmacogenomics, #Depression, #MentalHealth, #MDD, #PGX, #PRS, #PersonalizedMedicine, #Bioethics, #FDA, #APA, #Neuropsychiatry, #HealthEquity