Episodios

  • Trump Budget Bill Analysis: Wealth Gaps, ICE Surge & Democracy Risks | July 5, 2025 Podcast & Article Analysis

    Trump Budget Bill Analysis: Wealth Gaps, ICE Surge & Democracy Risks | July 5, 2025 Podcast & Article Analysis
    Jul 6 2025
    The Arithmetic of American Fracture: Notes on the American SettlementBy Earl Cotten for The Earl AngleOne notices first the paper. The bill arrives in a three-ring binder, nine hundred pages thick, the kind of document designed to be photographed rather than read. The title—“One Big Beautiful Bill”—suggests a real estate prospectus for a gated community, perhaps one overlooking a sea of receding possibilities. This is how America redistributes its future now: not with grand manifestos or revolution, but with columns of numbers, actuarial tables, and the dry syntax of appropriation. The numbers, as always, tell the story we pretend not to see.I. The Permanent ThingsConsider the estate tax. A reduction of $212 billion, locked in perpetuity. The language is technical—"unified credit increase," "portability adjustment"—but the effect is medieval: a fortress wall around dynastic wealth. One thinks of the English country houses, those monuments to entailed inheritance now preserved as museums. Here, the preservation is legislative. A family earning over $3.3 million annually will keep an extra $103,500 per year. Compound interest does the rest. By 2040, inherited wealth in the United States will double. One generation’s windfall becomes the next generation’s birthright. The old American fiction of self-creation dissolves in the ink of this provision.The corporate cuts are similarly eternal. "Full expensing," they call it—$363 billion allowing businesses to write off equipment immediately. A factory owner buys a new stamping press; the Treasury absorbs the cost. The press stamps out profits; the profits buy back stock; the stock inflates executive bonuses. The workers who operate the press receive a temporary deduction on overtime pay—capped at $25,000, expiring in 2028. A stopwatch ticks in the fine print.Table: The Architecture of PermanenceThe deficit swells by $3.3 trillion. When questioned, a Senator calls it "magic math." One recalls the magicians of Enron, conjuring profits from air. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget uses blunter language: accounting gimmick. But gimmicks require belief, and belief is what remains when the numbers defy comprehension.II. The Unsettling of SafetyMedicaid unravels at the seams. Eleven million eight hundred thousand people will lose coverage. The mechanism is bureaucratic: semi-annual eligibility checks, eighty-hour monthly work requirements for a parent whose child turns fourteen, a $35 copay for a diabetic’s insulin vial. The CBO report reads like a clinical triage assessment. Low-income seniors. Pregnant women. The intermittently employed.In rural Alabama, a community hospital administrator tells me his facility will close. "Medicaid pays for 60% of our births," he says. The bill offers a $50 billion "rural rescue fund"—a life raft stitched from tissue paper. He calls it a band-aid on an amputation. The phrase stays with me. One imagines the tourniquets applied elsewhere: the $1,600 annual income loss for a family of four. The mother forgoing a Pap smear because the clinic now demands cash. The arithmetic of subtraction.III. The Enforcement SublimeImmigration enforcement receives $170 billion—a sum so vast it ceases to signify anything but force. One hundred thousand detention beds. Ten thousand new ICE officers with $10,000 signing bonuses. The goal: one million deportations per year. The money builds a machine that must be fed. Asylum applications now carry fees. Work permits become luxuries. Even trafficking victims lose access to food stamps.I visit a border NGO in El Paso. Their director slides a budget across the desk: $2.1 million annually to provide legal aid, blankets, infant formula. "ICE’s increase alone is 8,000 times our budget," she says. The zeroes align like soldiers. This is the new American calculus: $100,000 to detain one person for one year versus $4.50 for a meal not provided.IV. The Generational TheftMillennials hold 20% less wealth than Gen X did at their age. The bill codifies their dispossession. Pell Grants shrink, ensuring fewer will escape debt. Clean energy jobs vanish as EV credits expire. Housing grows more unattainable with every SALT deduction that inflates coastal property values.The "Trump Accounts"—$1,000 baby bonds—are presented as recompense. A sleight of hand. A child born to the top 10% will inherit over $1 million; one born to the bottom half gets $5,000. The bond is a stone thrown into the chasm. One does not hear it land.V. The Democratic ErosionCambridge professor Helen Thompson once wrote that extreme wealth gaps enable "state capture for rent-seeking." The top 1% now approaches 40% of U.S. income. This bill accelerates the capture: starving public goods, shuttering rural hospitals, validating every suspicion that the system exists to be gamed.In Poland and Hungary, democracy eroded through similar arithmetic—tax cuts for loyalists, defunding of dissent. Oxford’s Ngaire Woods ...
    Más Menos
    37 m
  • Luttig Scorches Roberts & Trump: Constitutional Crisis as Presidency Mirrors Monarchy | July 4, 2025 Podcast & Article Analysis

    Luttig Scorches Roberts & Trump: Constitutional Crisis as Presidency Mirrors Monarchy | July 4, 2025 Podcast & Article Analysis
    Jul 5 2025
    The Unforgivable Reticence: Silence in the Hour of the WolfBy Earl Cotten for The Earl AngleThe former President, face florid, spittle forming at the corner of his mouth, demanding the impeachment of a federal judge. The name changes – Boasberg this week, someone else the next – but the incantation remains constant, a dark liturgy against the robes. The sound is off. One doesn’t need to hear the words; the intention vibrates through the screen, a low hum of menace. It is a performance designed for maximum erosion. And presiding over the highest court in this fractured land, a man known for the precision of his diction, chooses silence. It is this silence, this particular and devastating quiet emanating from One First Street, that draws the eye. It is a silence observed, dissected, and ultimately condemned by another man, a man whose pedigree within the conservative legal firmament is beyond reproach, whose disillusionment arrives not as a surprise, but as an indictment: Judge J. Michael Luttig.Luttig. The name itself carries a certain weight, a specific gravity within the rarefied atmosphere of Republican jurisprudence. Not a celebrity, not a pundit, but an architect. One thinks of the quiet offices where such men operate, the smell of leather-bound reporters and stale coffee, the hushed conversations shaping destinies unseen by the public. He placed Clarence Thomas on the Supreme Court. He mentored the ambitious, the Ted Cruzes of the world, sharp young minds hungry for influence. His own name floated for decades on the shortlists of Republican presidents – Reagan, Bush, Bush again – a whispered possibility, a potential cornerstone. He sat for fifteen years on the Fourth Circuit, his opinions rendered with a meticulousness that made them required reading, not merely citations but blueprints. He is, in the most profound sense, of the institution. He helped pour its foundations. And now, he stands outside the temple he helped build, his voice tight, not with rage, but with a profound, weary disappointment directed squarely at his old friend, the Chief Justice of the United States, John Roberts. To hear Luttig speak now is to witness not just a critique, but a tectonic shift within the very bedrock of the conservative legal movement. It feels less like commentary and more like the measured pronouncement of a seismologist confirming the fault line has ruptured.The relationship between Luttig and Roberts is not incidental. It is woven into the fabric of their careers, a shared history stretching back to the corridors of the Reagan White House Counsel’s office. Young men then, brilliant, ambitious, steeped in a vision of conservative legal order. They moved in the same tight orbit, that small constellation of future judges and justices, speaking a language of precedent and restraint, believing in the slow, deliberate turning of the legal wheel. When Luttig ascended to the bench, it was Roberts who stepped into his vacated role. There is a history there, of shared meals, shared arguments, shared aspirations for the institution they revered. Luttig has called Roberts “one of the smartest people I’ve ever met,” a man possessing a piercing self-awareness about the Court’s place in the long arc of history. This shared past, this intimate understanding of the man and the office he holds, is what makes Luttig’s public dissection so devastating. It is not the attack of an outsider, but the anguished correction of a fellow architect who sees the structure buckling. “There is nothing that John Roberts is not aware of,” Luttig has stated, a simple sentence freighted with unbearable weight. “That’s why I’ve been so disappointed in him.” The word "disappointed" hangs in the air, deliberate, precise. It is the vocabulary of personal betrayal, the sigh of a man who expected more, knew the capacity for more, and witnessed instead a retreat. It is the sound of history colliding with the present moment, and history finding the present wanting.The assault itself unfolds with a grim predictability now, a ritual enacted whenever the legal process dares to impede the will of the former President. A ruling is handed down – blocking a deportation order, perhaps, or demanding the release of documents – something inconvenient, something that asserts the independence of a coordinate branch. The response is instantaneous, broadcast not through legal briefs but through the megaphone of social media: “IMPEACH THE JUDGE!” “CROOKED!” “OBAMA JUDGE!” The names of the jurists become targets, painted in the digital equivalent of scarlet. It matters little that impeachment, under the Constitution, is reserved for “Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors” – acts of profound individual misconduct, not policy disagreements. The historical record is stark: in over two centuries, only 15 federal judges have faced Senate impeachment trials; only 8 were convicted, all for ...
    Más Menos
    38 m
  • FCC Reverses Prison Phone Price Cap: $500M Savings Blocked, Top Trump Donors Benefit | July 4, 2025 Podcast & Article Analysis

    FCC Reverses Prison Phone Price Cap: $500M Savings Blocked, Top Trump Donors Benefit | July 4, 2025 Podcast & Article Analysis
    Jul 5 2025
    The Alchemy of Separation: On the FCC and the Price of a VoiceIt happens quietly, this sort of thing. A decision rendered in the hermetic chambers of the Federal Communications Commission, couched in the bloodless prose of bureaucracy: "Order on Reconsideration," "Temporary Suspension," "Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking." The words slide past the attention, designed not to snag on the consciousness of the ordinary citizen. Yet beneath this veneer of administrative procedure lies a transaction of a different order, an alchemy practiced for decades that transmutes human longing and institutional power into pure profit. The FCC, under the stewardship of Chair Brendan Carr, has chosen to suspend, until at least April 2027, rate caps that would have rendered prison phone calls merely expensive, rather than extortionate. The caps, a fragile victory born of a grandmother’s decades-long anguish, would have limited the cost of a fifteen-minute call to ninety cents. Without them, it can again cost eleven dollars and thirty-five cents. Eleven dollars and thirty-five cents to hear the voice of your son, your mother, your brother, for fifteen fractured minutes.Consider the arithmetic of absence. A billion dollars a year. That is the sum extracted, year after year, from the pockets of families – overwhelmingly poor, disproportionately Black and Brown – simply to maintain the frayed threads of connection with an incarcerated loved one. A billion dollars. It is a number so vast it loses meaning, abstracted into the realm of economic indicators. Translate it: the skipped meals, the unfilled prescriptions for insulin or heart medication, the shoes not bought for a growing child, the bus fare foregone. These are the concrete sacrifices made at the altar of the prison phone. This billion dollars does not vanish into the ether; it flows with ruthless efficiency into the coffers of telecommunications giants like Securus and Global Tel Link, and from them, via a mechanism as cynical as it is opaque, directly into the budgets of the prisons and jails themselves. The kickbacks, euphemistically termed "site commissions," can consume half of every dollar paid by a trembling hand feeding coins into a payphone in a prison visiting room. The facility profits more when the call costs more. The incentive is perverse, naked, and immensely profitable.One recalls Martha Wright-Reed. Her name is on the law – the Martha Wright-Reed Just and Reasonable Communications Act of 2022 – that this FCC suspension now effectively guts. She was a grandmother living on a fixed income who understood the arithmetic of absence in her bones. She scraped together more than a hundred dollars a month, money that meant choosing between her own medication and the sound of her grandson’s voice echoing from behind concrete and razor wire. She sued. She persisted. Her fight, a solitary figure against the vast indifference of the carceral state and its corporate partners, eventually forged a rare moment of Congressional unanimity. The law passed, mandating the FCC to act, to make these calls "just and reasonable." It was a testament to the sheer, undeniable cruelty of the existing system. That was 2022. The FCC, under Carr, met the law’s deadline in 2023 with rules set for 2024. And now, in 2024, those rules are suspended. The machinery of delay grinds on. Martha Wright-Reed’s victory, it seems, was provisional.Follow the money. This is the imperative whispered in every political corridor, the thread one pulls to unravel the tapestry of power. It leads, inevitably, to the private prison operators, GEO Group and CoreCivic. These are not merely beneficiaries of the kickback regime; they are its architects and fervent defenders. The suspension of the caps preserves their lucrative slice of the billion-dollar pie. But the connection runs deeper, into the well-lit parlors of political fundraising. GEO Group moved with the swift precision of men who understand the value of access. It became the very first corporate entity to max out its donations to the Trump 2024 campaign through its PAC. On the same day, its CEO and chairman each contributed $11,600. Then came the sleight of hand: a $1 million donation funneled through a GEO Group subsidiary to a pro-Trump Super PAC, a maneuver that watchdogs decried as a likely end-run around laws prohibiting political donations from federal contractors. GEO Group and CoreCivic each bestowed $500,000 upon the Trump inauguration. Former officials from that administration, like "border czar" Tom Homan and ex-Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi, now find comfortable berths on GEO Group’s payroll. The symbiosis is complete: political support fuels policy decisions that guarantee revenue streams that fund further political support. It is a closed loop, insulated from the cries emanating from the visiting rooms.Chairman Carr’s justification for this suspension possesses a certain chilling banality. He speaks of "...
    Más Menos
    25 m
  • Radical Founding, Modern Threat: America’s Unfinished Fight for Equality | July 3, 2025 Podcast & Article Analysis

    Radical Founding, Modern Threat: America’s Unfinished Fight for Equality | July 3, 2025 Podcast & Article Analysis
    Jul 4 2025
    The Ongoing Struggle for Equality's PromiseThe proposition hangs in the air still. That one, drafted in Philadelphia heat: all men are created equal. We recite it now like catechism, forgetting how the words exploded onto a world ordered by blood and crown. A radical utterance, yes. An act of faith scribbled onto parchment while men were bought and sold down by the docks, while nations lived on the land beyond the settlements, while half the human race remained legal non-persons. The dissonance was baked in from the start. The promise universal, the application viciously particular.One learns to live with the crack in the foundation. Or rather, the nation learned, uneasily. The dissonance festered. It split the house. It spilled blood in fields from Manassas to Selma. The Civil War settled nothing finally, only made the contours of the lie starker. The Civil Rights Movement clawed at the edifice, chipping away mortar. Always the proposition was contested territory, fought over clause by clause, inch by bloodied inch. "Equality" expanded not through grace, but through relentless, grinding pressure applied against the original, deliberate exclusions.And yet. The threat persists. It never recedes for long. The core idea – that fragile, audacious proposition born in 1776 – remains perpetually vulnerable. Not to frontal assault, perhaps, but to erosion, to neglect, to the slow poison of thinking the work is done. It requires vigilance, this American faith. It demands the fight. Always the fight. For its realization was never guaranteed, only promised. And promises, as we know too well, are easily broken.The Cost of Liberty: A Nation's Unfinished PropositionThe heat. Always the heat when one speaks of Philadelphia in July. A wet wool blanket thrown over the chest, the air thick with the promise of thunder that rarely breaks clean. One imagines it then, in that room: the tall windows perhaps open, admitting not relief but the dense, insect-thrumming air of a city simmering. The smell of horse dung and unwashed wool and the peculiar metallic tang of anxiety. Men in waistcoats, sweat beading at their hairlines, their collars wilting. A fly buzzing against a pane. The scratch of quills. The weight of words being set down, words like stones intended to anchor a new world.We hold these truths to be self-evident.Consider the audacity. Consider the sheer, breathtaking nerve of it. In the year 1776, in a world rigidly stratified by blood and land and divine right, where kings were kings by God’s own ordinance and peasants knew their place as surely as the ox knows the yoke, a collection of provincial lawyers, planters, merchants – revolutionaries, yes, but men accustomed to a certain order within their sphere – inscribed onto parchment a sentence that detonated the bedrock of centuries.That all men are created equal.It is the sentence that echoes, still. The sentence that defines the American experiment, or perhaps haunts it. One reads it now, the ink long dry on the engrossed copy under its bulletproof glass in Washington, and the words vibrate with a dangerous purity. They were radicals, these men. They knew it. The King knew it. The comfortable hierarchies of Europe recoiled. To declare inherent human equality, unalienable rights bestowed not by monarch or parliament, but by a Creator – it was an intellectual grenade tossed into the powder keg of history. It implied, demanded even, a perpetual state of becoming, a constant unsettling of any imposed station. No man born better. No man born to kneel.And yet.The fly buzzing against the pane. The slave outside, fanning the air for his master. The indigenous nations beyond the Alleghenies, whose concept of land and sovereignty bore no resemblance to the deeds being drawn up in coastal capitals. The silence in that room, the profound, unexamined silence, hangs heavy over the parchment now. It is the silence of exclusion, the silence of a radicalism bounded by the horizon of the possible, or perhaps merely the horizon of the comfortable. "Men," in that luminous sentence, shimmered with a specific meaning. White men. Men of property, certainly. The enslaved African? Property. The indigenous inhabitant? An obstacle, perhaps a savage. The woman? An adjunct, invisible in the political calculus. The truths were self-evident, it seemed, only within a very specific frame of reference. The radical document was, simultaneously, a document of profound limitation. The revolution was declared, but its deepest implications were quarantined.The dissonance was there from the start, a hairline crack in the foundation stone. America was born not merely on an idea, but on this specific, potent, and ultimately unstable contradiction: the declaration of universal equality predicated on a tacit understanding of profound, inherent inequality. The nation would spend its blood and treasure and moral capital wrestling with this dissonance. The silence in that Philadelphia room would ...
    Más Menos
    25 m
  • House GOP Scrambles for Votes on Controversial Budget Bill: Medicaid Cuts, Tax Breaks & Midnight Standoff | July 2, 2025 Podcast & Article Analysis

    House GOP Scrambles for Votes on Controversial Budget Bill: Medicaid Cuts, Tax Breaks & Midnight Standoff | July 2, 2025 Podcast & Article Analysis
    Jul 3 2025
    SUMMARYThe podcast describes a chaotic legislative effort in the United States Congress to pass a highly unpopular bill before an arbitrary Fourth of July deadline, Consider the Fourth of July deadline. An arbitrary marker, a day heavy with myth, chosen not by legislative necessity but by fiat from a former president demanding loyalty. The bill itself is a blunt instrument: tax cuts carved deep for corporations and the already wealthy, paid for by stripping sustenance from the poor – Medicaid pared to the bone, food assistance withdrawn. More money, always more, for the machinery of border enforcement. It is unpopular. Wildly so. This is known.The Republican Party fractures along familiar, yet newly jagged, lines. Members from swing districts calculate the coming electoral wrath, a cold sweat on the brow. The far-right faction hungers for deeper cuts still, a purer austerity. They speak of principle. It is difficult to hear over the clatter of ambition and fear.Enter the billionaires. Elon Musk, inhabiting a realm beyond conventional politics, threatens retribution of his own: primary challengers funded lavishly for any Republican who dares support this thing. Loyalty to Trump is demanded; loyalty to a different, perhaps capricious, power is incentivized. A counter-pressure. A silent auction of political souls.And so the House leadership, Speaker Mike Johnson presiding, descends into procedural grotesquerie. Rules are bent past recognition, shortcuts are paved through parliamentary norms. The effort is frantic, almost feral. To force passage. To meet the arbitrary hour.One watches the machinery strain. It groans under the weight of external demands, of private fealties masquerading as public service. The will of the public seems a distant, disregarded noise. There is a sense of systems failing not through neglect, but through deliberate, almost ritualistic, overload. The outcome remains uncertain. The damage, however, accrues. It accrues in the brittle silence of those already hungry, in the calculations of the powerful, in the very architecture of a government bending itself to shapes no civic blueprint ever intended. The deadline looms. The Fourth of July. Fireworks will bloom over a capital where something essential may have already burned itself out.The Earl Angle is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.Key Takeaways* House passes Trump's budget bill after overnight standoff, clearing final procedural hurdle 219-213 .* Medicaid cuts total $930B, projected to leave 12M uninsured through work requirements and provider tax limits .* GOP governors stay silent on Medicaid reductions affecting their states, unlike 2017 resistance .* Deficit projected to rise $3.3T despite safety net cuts, per CBO analysis .* Trump threatened primary challenges to holdouts like Rep. Massie, calling delays "COSTING YOU VOTES!!!" .Midnight Madness: The Overnight Vote That Almost Derailed EverythingMan, what a night in D.C. House Republicans were this close to blowing their July 4 deadline for Trump's big bill. Speaker Mike Johnson kept that procedural vote open for hours - like, way past midnight - while five GOP holdouts dug in their heels. Folks like Thomas Massie (that Kentucky rep with the debt clock necklace) and Brian Fitzpatrick from Pennsylvania just weren't budging initially. Johnson's sweating bullets cause he can only lose three votes max with their tiny majority, ya know?Table: The Late-Night HoldoutsTrump's blasting Truth Social posts like "What are the Republicans waiting for??? MAGA NOT HAPPY!!!" at 1am. Classic. Meanwhile Johnson's cutting deals in back rooms - probably promising everything but his firstborn to flip those votes. By 3:30am, they finally got it done 219-213. Fitzpatrick was the lone GOP "no" in the end. Dude must have nerves of steel.Inside the "Big Beautiful Bill": Tax Breaks, Border Walls, and Medicaid CutsSo what's actually in this 800-page monster? First off, it makes those 2017 Trump tax cuts permanent - which is huge for corporations and high earners. The Tax Policy Center says the richest 20% get average $10,950 cuts next year while the poorest get $150. Kinda tells ya where the priorities are, right?Then there's the no-tax-on-tips thing Trump campaigned on. Service workers'll appreciate that one. But here's the tradeoff: $350 billion for border security (including that "Golden Dome" defense system - sounds sci-fi but it's real) and military spending. Plus lifting the debt ceiling by $5 trillion so we can actually pay for all this.The ugly part? How they pay for it. We're talking $930 billion sliced from Medicaid over 10 years. They're adding work requirements (80 hours/month), making people prove eligibility twice a year, and cutting what states can collect through provider taxes. Oh and they're banning Medicaid coverage for gender transition care - that got challenged but they snuck it back in.Medicaid ...
    Más Menos
    23 m
  • Trump’s Iran Admission, Economic Slump & GOP Medicaid Cuts | June 29, 2025 Podcast & Article Analysis

    Trump’s Iran Admission, Economic Slump & GOP Medicaid Cuts | June 29, 2025 Podcast & Article Analysis
    Jun 30 2025
    This podcast episode examines, "Political Upheaval: Economy, Foreign Policy, and Budget Battles," which explores four significant political narratives. First, it discusses a contraction in the U.S. economy, attributed to President Trump's tariff policies and reduced consumer spending, contrasting it with a prior period of productivity. Second, the document highlights controversies surrounding U.S. foreign policy toward Iran, including intercepted communications about the effectiveness of U.S. strikes and President Trump's astonishing admission of allowing Iran to attack a U.S. military base. Third, the source details a Republican budget reconciliation bill that proposes substantial cuts to programs for low-income Americans, leading to political pushback and the decision of a senator not to seek re-election. Finally, the text addresses challenges to the budget bill's passage, including objections from the Senate parliamentarian, President Trump's directive to disregard these rules, and concerns about the bill's impact on the national debt and its proposed funding increases for immigration enforcement.The Earl Angle is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.Key Takeaways* 💥 Senate Parliamentarian Blocks Key Medicaid Cuts: A central part of Trump’s tax and spending bill violates Senate rules, forcing Republicans to rewrite or remove $250 billion in Medicaid cuts aimed at funding tax breaks .* 📉 12+ Million Could Lose Medicaid: Nonpartisan analysts project enrollment drops due to work requirements, copays, and provider tax changes—contradicting Trump’s claim cuts target only “waste, fraud, and abuse” .* ⚠️ Rural Hospitals Face Closure Risk: Cuts to Medicaid provider taxes could cripple facilities in states like Missouri and West Virginia, with stopgap funding proposals ranging from $15B–$100B .* ☢️ Iran Strike Effectiveness Disputed: While Trump claims U.S. attacks “obliterated” nuclear sites, defense intelligence reports suggest damage was significant but not total, leaving uranium stockpiles largely intact .* ⏳ July 4 Deadline in Jeopardy: GOP infighting over Medicaid and border spending delays the bill, risking debt ceiling deadlines and Trump’s promise to sign it by Independence Day .The Medicaid Showdown: Cuts, Chaos, and Senate RoadblocksPresident Trump’s sweeping tax and spending bill hit a procedural wall this week. The Senate parliamentarian—y'know, Elizabeth MacDonough—ruled that core Medicaid cuts in the GOP package violate budget reconciliation rules. This means Republicans can’t pass ’em with a simple majority vote. They’d need 60 votes instead, which is impossible given Democratic opposition .Republicans planned to save $250 billion partly by slashing state Medicaid provider taxes. These taxes let states tax hospitals, then use the cash to draw more federal funds. Nearly every state uses this to prop up rural hospitals. The House bill froze these taxes, but the Senate wanted deeper cuts. MacDonough said no dice, calling it extraneous to the budget process .GOP leaders now scramble. Options include:* Rewriting the provision (likely)* Scrapping it entirely (risking deficit spikes)* Overruling MacDonough (Thune opposes this)Trump’s July 4 deadline? It’s looking shaky.Fact-Checking Trump’s “Waste, Fraud, and Abuse” Spin“We’re not changing Medicaid... only cutting waste, fraud, and abuse,” Trump insisted last month. He repeated this seven times in one speech . But the bill’s own text tells a different story:* Work Requirements: Mandates 80+ monthly work hours for Medicaid recipients aged 19–64. Research shows most already work or qualify for exemptions—but paperwork hurdles boot eligible people off rolls .* Undocumented Immigrants: Cuts federal Medicaid reimbursements by 10% for states covering undocumented residents (like CA or NY). This pressures states to drop coverage .* Planned Parenthood Ban: Blocks Medicaid funding for clinics providing abortions .* Copays and Retroactive Limits: Adds $35 copays per service and shrinks retroactive coverage from 90 days to 30 .Table: Projected Medicaid Coverage LossesThe CBO confirms: “Medicaid savings primarily come from reduced enrollment” . Not fraud prevention.Rural Hospitals Sound the Alarm“Getting the fund is good... but is it just paper?” That’s Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) questioning a GOP plan to offset Medicaid cuts with a rural hospital fund. His state has 16 at-risk hospitals .Here’s why: Medicaid covers 20% of rural Americans. Provider tax cuts could starve hospitals of $50B+ over a decade. The American Hospital Association warns ERs would become “the family doctor for millions” while facilities close .Republicans proposed a $15 billion fund. Susan Collins (R-ME) called that “crumbs” next to the need. She wants $100B. Jim Justice (R-WV) pleaded: “Don’t cut into bone” . But fiscal...
    Más Menos
    32 m