This episode describes many (but not all) legal protections for patient safety concerns. There are at least 10 legal protections for this podcast and Institute Medicus website. It is a matter of public interest: elected officials and oversight deleted evidence of illegal Rx to aid a felon who imperiled public and patient safety.

There is no way to protect patients from a hospital donor who harmed patients if oversight protects criminals. Doctors have reporting obligations but it is futile if oversight is conspiring with known criminals. All are welcome to refute these claims; we encourage discussion how to best protect patients from those who willfully imperil patient and public safety.

It is our opinion that, unless oversight is investigated and held accountable for their role in protecting racketeering criminals, patients and doctors [who are willing to speak out] are in danger.

Financial stakeholders influenced US healthcare legislation so the judicial system has become irrelevant. Instead of a court room, oversight holds sketchy meetings with financial stakeholders. Our multi $T healthcare industry has no check and balance system.

Mental health: Wisconsin DSPS called a race-based hate retaliation Johns Hopkins lawsuit evidence of mental illness while refusing to investigate how a hospital falsified mental health "evidence" to achieve a Martha Mitchell Effect.

Wisconsin politicians and licensing board oversight (DSPS) aided and participated in crime, deleted criminal evidence, and at least two cancer patients died from fraudulent skin cancer surgeries and clinical sabotage. Oversight appears unwilling to investigate because they don't want the outcome known to the public.

No No Nanette alleged oversight attorneys aided healthcare crime by:

1. Deleting illegal Rx evidence,
2. Refusing to investigate those who harmed patients,
3. Using libel to call concern for crime a paranoid delusion: this is now included in psychology diagnosis (DSM-5, Martha Mitchell Effect, see below).

Wisconsin Supreme Court Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) aided the murder of legally vulnerable caner patients. OLR seems to be under the influence of lobbyists: WI DSPS oversight attorney and physician misconduct aided the murder of two legally vulnerable skin cancer patients. OLR claims attorneys are "justified" after a state prosecutor and DSPS Judge deleted illegal Rx data, denied a victim physician (witness) due process, and refused to investigate despite 8 years of complaints (>200K documents). OLR is aiding crime by refusing to investigate attorney misconduct.

Jane Doe #2 death November 2002 was aided by WI Supreme Court OLR.

Martha Mitchell Effect refers to the late Martha Mitchell, wife of President Nixon's Attorney General. She blew the whistle on Watergate crimes but the Nixon administration succeeded in discrediting her by calling her paranoid and delusional. Mental health diagnostic criteria (DSM) includes Martha Mitchell Effect: a presumed "paranoid delusion" diagnosis is later proven to be true.

Wisconsin healthcare oversight attorneys relied on the Martha Mitchell Effect to protect WI criminals: they called concern for crime a paranoid delusion. WI Supreme Court Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) failed to discipline attorneys despite criminal evidence and patients who died. To protect patient and public safety, No No Nanette asks the public to report crime to the FBI. She seeks legal representation to explain attorney misconduct to the current Wisconsin Supreme Court OLR.

Wisconsin medical licensing attorneys aided crime: illegal Rx drugs and patients were harmed. Attorney misconduct includes:

• Denying due process
• Refusing to do patient record review
• Bad faith allegations become licensing board libel (claims omitted all 4 HCQIA law criteria)
• Deleting illegal Rx evidence (prosecutorial misconduct, episode 6)

Will healthcare prosecutors face prosecution? They aided a felon's racketeering acts including the premeditated murder of elderly cancer patients. Attorneys may have protected political donors (financial stakeholders) by conspiring with SKIN-CARTEL; they willfully failed their ministerial and custodial duties.

Fake skin cancer surgeries is a growing concern in the United States. Wisconsin medical licensing board attorneys protected a hospital (political) donor's lucrative sham skin cancer surgeries and called concern for crime a paranoid delusion. Patients died.

Mental health: a patient's death is devastating to both the victim's family and health care provider(s).

No No Nanette discusses how hospitals destroy those who tell the truth. Legally vulnerable patients died from medical malfeasance that obstructed clinic and sabotaged patient care. Instead of investigating, oversight protected a hospital donor's intentional patient harm and his co-conspirators who boasted political donations gave them lax healthcare oversight.

Perhaps the most terrifying is this: while a WI state prosecutor Joost Kap Esq. aiding illegal Rx drugs and intentional patient harm of a known felon, Wisconsin state healthcare (DSPS) Judge Thomas H. Ryan and Chair of the medical licensing board enjoyed promotions to federal and national licensing board leadership (Federation of State Medical Board and Interstate Licensure Compact).

Join us if you want healthcare reform: we're talking about ways to fix the US healthcare system.

1. Healthcare is too expensive
2. US outcomes are poor despite the high cost
3. "Money Man" controls oversight and politicians

Doctors cannot speak up in an environment of retaliation. Oversight protects political donors ("money man") instead of patients. If Warren Buffet was unable to convince financial stakeholders that they must lead healthcare reform, they don't belong at the healthcare reform table. Healthcare workers, patients, and public health experts should lead and demand change.

We're holding people's feet to the fire. In response to raising concern, oversight aided retaliation that intentionally harmed patients. This is not a culture of compassion; it is fear mongering and intimidation. We can benchmark quality healthcare using:

1. Compassion: what would you want if it was your mother or loved ones?
2. Integrity: healthcare requires honesty. We must call out dishonest people, administrators and oversight "leaders."
3. Excellence: we need to continually strive to improve and self-reflect.

Why are we doing this? Because we can. Dr. No No Nanette wants to change this culture of retaliatory medical malfeasance that caused at least 2 patient deaths. This won't change unless we tell our stories and find ways to improve the system.

Here I outline how the compilation of evidence will be assembled for reports.