Send us a text

EPISODE SUMMARY
This episode of Wrestling Payments tackles the critical topic of exposure limits in modern payments. Host Joe Casali and guest Sean Carter, President & CEO of Neach Payments Group, dissect an article by Jordan Bennett of Nacha, which focuses on payment modernization and digital transformation. Sean highlights a common misconception: viewing exposure limits solely through the lens of credit risk. He argues for a broader perspective, emphasizing operational risks like account takeovers and business email compromise.

Sean explains how current exposure limit practices often focus on the unlikely event of a business's complete failure, rather than the more frequent occurrences of chargebacks and return items. He advocates for a more holistic review process, considering IT security practices and overall risk management. Sean also discusses the challenges financial institutions face with third-party senders and the importance of consistent due diligence.

Finally, Sean challenges the common practice of assigning uniform exposure limits. He urges listeners to consider the unique risks of each originator and leverage available tools for efficient limit monitoring and enforcement. This episode provides valuable insights for financial institutions looking to strengthen their payment processes and mitigate risk.

Sean Carter
President & CEO
Neach Payments Group and NEACH
Payments risk expert advocating for holistic exposure limit reviews.
LinkedIn

KEY INSIGHTS
Rethinking Exposure Limits

Exposure limits are often mistakenly viewed solely through the lens of credit risk. This narrow focus overlooks the significant operational risks prevalent in today's digital payment landscape, such as account takeovers and business email compromise. A more comprehensive approach considers a company's IT security practices, overall risk management, and the potential for fraud, ensuring a more robust and effective risk mitigation strategy. Shifting the focus from the unlikely scenario of complete business failure to the more frequent occurrences of chargebacks and returns offers a more practical and relevant assessment of risk.

Third-Party Sender Oversight

Financial institutions must extend their rigorous risk management practices to third-party senders. While institutions may have robust internal controls, neglecting the oversight of third-party partners creates a vulnerability. Ensuring these partners adhere to the same level of due diligence and risk assessment is crucial for maintaining a strong security posture and protecting the institution from potential fraud and operational failures. This includes implementing agreements and monitoring processes to guarantee consistent security practices across the payment ecosystem.