
033 - Peter Clarke - Network State vs Dark Enlightenment
No se pudo agregar al carrito
Add to Cart failed.
Error al Agregar a Lista de Deseos.
Error al eliminar de la lista de deseos.
Error al añadir a tu biblioteca
Error al seguir el podcast
Error al dejar de seguir el podcast
-
Narrado por:
-
De:
Acerca de esta escucha
Summary
In this conversation, Peter Clarke and KMO explore the concepts of network states and dark enlightenment, discussing their compatibility and implications for governance in a post-liberal world. They delve into the competition for high agency individuals between these systems, the potential role of AI in future governance, and the evolution of societal structures in a world where traditional jobs may become obsolete. The discussion also touches on the importance of status games and the need for new ideas to navigate the rapidly changing landscape of technology and governance.
Takeaways
The idea of a cybernetic harmony between machines and nature.
Post-liberal governance is characterized by the emergence of network states and dark enlightenment.
Network states are communities formed online with the goal of becoming recognized as legitimate states.
High agency individuals are attracted to network states due to their flexibility and potential for innovation.
AI is expected to play a significant role in future governance structures.
The concept of status games may evolve in a jobless future, providing new forms of social validation.
The viability of network states is questioned in terms of their ability to defend against traditional state powers.
A one world government may emerge as a necessity to manage global risks associated with advanced technologies.
The ultra wealthy may leverage network states to escape taxes and create exclusive communities.
New ideas and frameworks are needed to adapt to the rapid changes brought by technology.