
The Modern Scholar: Christianity At the Crossroads: The Reformations of the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries
No se pudo agregar al carrito
Add to Cart failed.
Error al Agregar a Lista de Deseos.
Error al eliminar de la lista de deseos.
Error al añadir a tu biblioteca
Error al seguir el podcast
Error al dejar de seguir el podcast
$0.00 por los primeros 30 días
Compra ahora por $17.19
No default payment method selected.
We are sorry. We are not allowed to sell this product with the selected payment method
-
Narrado por:
-
Thomas F. Madden
-
De:
-
Thomas F. Madden
Listeners also enjoyed...




















Las personas que vieron esto también vieron:


















Fantastic!
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
excellent and objective
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
An EXCELLENT, and FACTUAL work
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Another excellent set of history lectures
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Excellent.
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Clarity!!
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Most Protestants and Catholics today have a very limited knowledge of the history of the the Catholic Church. After listening to this class, I am convinced most of my more scholarly Protestant friends and I have very little knowledge of the history surrounding key events and figures on both sides of the conflict. It's safe to say I know of no one who knows or cares of the reformation within the Catholic Church.
Yet, regardless of whether one believes in God or not, these events in the 16th to 17th centuries dramatically effect how we live today. This class leads me to look at my own faith in a different light altogether.
Great History Class on Era that Still Effects Us
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Any additional comments?
I found it fascinating. I enjoyed the way it was delivered without a leading toward a certain viewpoint.Informative and interesting!!
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
But this one does NOT download!!! Yet all signs (from Audible's side, say it has).
DO NOT, DO NOT, DO NOT... until Audible deals with this, bother with this title!
Oh yeah, you can't review unless you give it at least one star - this should be negative stars!
DOES NOT DOWNLOAD - don't waste your credits!!!!
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
In Chapter 10 Madden flatly says:
1) that Catherine of Aragon's marriage to Arthur (Henry VIII's brother) was unconsumated because she was too young (born in 1485, betrothed at age 3, married in 1501 at age 15 or 16).
2) that Henry's motive for dissolution of the monasteries was solely greed for their money and that monks and nuns were lined up and forced to marry.
3) that Henry's biblical ground for believing his marriage to Catherine was unlawful, Leviticus 20:21. applies only to cases of divorce, not widowhood.
I have never before come across any author, of any background, saying or even hinting these things. Most acknowledge that Henry and Catherine told different stories about the consummation of her first marriage. Most acknowledge the financial motive in the dissolution, but also recognize the Protestant influence of Anne Bolyn and Thomas Cromwell. The story of monks and nuns being lined up for forced marriage seems unbelievable on its face and I've never heard of it before. As for the Bible, Madden cites Deuteronomy 25:5-6 though it's actually stronger than what he says; it commands a man to marry the childless widow of his dead brother, specifically to provide an heir for the dead. But I've never heard of anyone else saying that Leviticus 20:21 applies only to divorce, which is what he claims.
Throughout the work, Madden is trying to cover a lot of ground in a brief time, and is often rather sloppy in his summaries. But in this chapter he is either ignorant of the field or deliberately engaged in special pleading for the Roman Catholic supporters of Catherine of Aragon and Mary Tudor. Most historians give a taste of all points of view; here Madden does not even acknowledge other possible ideas.
p.s. Another clear case of bias is that he blames the St Bartholomew's day massacre soley on Catherine de'Medici, not even acknowledging other possible culprits, of whom there were several. He makes no mention of Pope Gregory's public approval of the massacre.
Bias and sloppiness
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.