
The Cabinet
George Washington and the Creation of an American Institution
No se pudo agregar al carrito
Add to Cart failed.
Error al Agregar a Lista de Deseos.
Error al eliminar de la lista de deseos.
Error al añadir a tu biblioteca
Error al seguir el podcast
Error al dejar de seguir el podcast
3 meses gratis
Compra ahora por $21.49
No default payment method selected.
We are sorry. We are not allowed to sell this product with the selected payment method
-
Narrado por:
-
Janet Metzger
On November 26, 1791, George Washington convened his department secretaries - Alexander Hamilton, Thomas Jefferson, Henry Knox, and Edmund Randolph - for the first cabinet meeting. Why did he wait two and a half years into his presidency to call his cabinet? Because the US Constitution did not create or provide for such a body. Washington was on his own.
Faced with diplomatic crises, domestic insurrections, and constitutional challenges - and finding congressional help lacking - Washington decided he needed a group of advisors he could turn to. He modeled his new cabinet on the councils of war he had led as commander of the Continental Army. In the early days, the cabinet served at the president's pleasure. Washington tinkered with its structure throughout his administration, at times calling regular meetings, at other times preferring written advice and individual discussions.
Lindsay M. Chervinsky reveals the far-reaching consequences of Washington's choice. The tensions in the cabinet between Hamilton and Jefferson heightened partisanship and contributed to the development of the first party system. And as Washington faced an increasingly recalcitrant Congress, he came to treat the cabinet as a private advisory body to summon as needed, greatly expanding the role of the president and the executive branch.
©2020 The President and Fellows of Harvard College (P)2020 TantorListeners also enjoyed...




















Las personas que vieron esto también vieron:


Not quite convinced
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Wonderful, informative read
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
It was okay for him to appoint heads of departments and to ask advice of them in matters related to their department, but they feared a president relying too much on the discussions and possibly decisions of a group of people. Thus it was two and one-half years into his first term before he called a meeting of his department heads together for advice.
Chervinsky emphasizes Washington’s military background as well as his own personality. We may think of Washington as a heroic father figure who was all wise and a great leader on his own. In fact, Washington’s wisdom was in gathering experts around him that he plied for information and advice, respecting them whether he took their advice or not, but making the final decision himself. That was his strength as a military leader and he took that humility into the presidency as well. That first cabinet meeting was a significant crisis and he wanted to hear from many different corners (and his cabinet included such polar opposites as Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson) before making the weighty decisions needed.
So, while the cabinet had been rejected by the writers of the Constitution, there was nothing in the Constitution that forbade it. It was the personal choice of the president and Washington set the precedent that has continued, though adapted, throughout the presidency to this day. It was an advisory body and didn’t make decisions, which were left to the president. And, the whole cabinet met to give advice whether the issue was something directly under their department or not.
Chervinsky goes through the history of the British cabinet, the discussions of the Constitutional Convention, and the history and personality of Washington. She shows how the cabinet helped in two major crises, one international and one domestic. Washington’s careful wording of the declaration of neutrality when war broke out between France and Britain is discussed in detail, but particularly the role that the cabinet played in the decision and in the wording of the declaration, which successfully kept the fledgling nation out of war at a time when it needed stability. The Whiskey Rebellion was a great test of the nation's will to remain united as well as the role of the federal government in a conflict in a single state. While this was an issue that fell under the Treasury Department, the input received from other cabinet members was invaluable at coming to a good solution both for the immediate problem but for the long-term precedent that all actions would create.
Chervinsky writes in a style that can be easily read by anyone interested in history or government. Her research into Washington’s life and work is especially helpful and makes the book even more relevant to today as the role of the president is under such scrutiny. Washington created a cabinet because he wanted to listen. He was decisive but not impulsive nor foolish. He never felt that he had all the answers or that only he could solve things.
I wouldn’t say that there is nothing that could be improved in this book. There were several places where it seemed that whole paragraphs were repeated. I’d like to have seen more about the parallels between his leadership as general and as president. But, I’d still highly recommend it to anyone who is thinking about the presidency and how it should operate. For that, this book provides food for thought and a good foundation for further study.
Wisdoms is in multiple heads talking together
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Great Insight into Washington’s Presidency
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Well researched but author has TDS bad
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Pretty dry.
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Great historical view
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Remarkable History Lesson
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Fruitful review of the first Presidency
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Loved it
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.