Donald Trump Versus Donald Trump Audiolibro Por Cesar Marcus arte de portada

Donald Trump Versus Donald Trump

Political and sociological analysis of how global geopolitics will change in 2025.

 Muestra de Voz Virtual
Prueba por $0.00
Prime logotipo Exclusivo para miembros Prime: ¿Nuevo en Audible? Obtén 2 audiolibros gratis con tu prueba.
Elige 1 audiolibro al mes de nuestra inigualable colección.
Escucha todo lo que quieras de entre miles de audiolibros, Originals y podcasts incluidos.
Accede a ofertas y descuentos exclusivos.
Premium Plus se renueva automáticamente por $14.95 al mes después de 30 días. Cancela en cualquier momento.

Donald Trump Versus Donald Trump

De: Cesar Marcus
Narrado por: Virtual Voice
Prueba por $0.00

$14.95 al mes después de 30 días. Cancela en cualquier momento.

Compra ahora por $4.99

Compra ahora por $4.99

Confirma la compra
la tarjeta con terminación
Cambiar método de pago
Al confirmar tu compra, aceptas las Condiciones de Uso de Audible y el Aviso de Privacidad de Amazon. Impuestos a cobrar según aplique.
Cancelar
Background images

Este título utiliza narración de voz virtual

Voz Virtual es una narración generada por computadora para audiolibros..

Acerca de esta escucha

 Trump 2025/2029
The arrival of Donald Trump to the presidency of the United States not only generates a considerable media impact, but also creates an environment marked by intensely conflicting emotions among the population. On one hand, a view emerges portraying him as a leader capable of breaking with established political norms—someone allegedly free from obligations to traditional politicians, thus endowed with the “independence” needed to undertake major reforms. In this collective imagination, his pledges to revitalize the national economy and protect certain emblematic sectors resonate deeply with various groups, particularly among those who perceive that globalization has undermined their job prospects or blurred their cultural identity.
On the other hand, groups appear who, from the outset, see in him a divisive figure and a threat to the stability of democratic norms, associating his confrontational style with a potential surge in authoritarian measures. This duality is powerfully reflected in large-scale demonstrations that erupt in the main cities of the western coast—and also in certain southern states where support for him is more pronounced.
Politically, the White House faces a parliamentary reality built on fragile, rapidly shifting support. Nevertheless, the Executive proves adept at using constitutionally authorized mechanisms to advance its agenda without fully subjecting it to legislative debate. Executive orders and legal maneuvers become frequent tools, enabling the government to circumvent the usual consensus requirements. A downside of this dynamic is growing distrust in the separation of powers: many believe the president overreaches by assuming prerogatives that, under less polarized circumstances, would call for collaborative management with Congress. Indeed, realignments in the chambers can change swiftly depending on the political climate, further encouraging a unilateral approach to governance.
Socially and culturally, polarization takes shape through lines of confrontation that encompass, among other factors, regional identities. Simultaneous rallies in favor and against the president in the more progressive West Coast and in certain conservative southern enclaves illustrate that it is not merely about partisan loyalties. Instead, it is a clash of worldviews on matters such as immigration, family values, security, and the role of the State. These historically rooted rifts grow sharper due to the Executive’s direct and continuous communication, which reinforces the perception that there are irreconcilable camps, making it harder to forge shared narratives that might ease tensions.
Although presidential systems generally grant some flexibility for decisive executive action, this experience shows to what extent fervent support from a core base can legitimize controversial measures. Analogous situations arise in other countries when a leader adopts a populist discourse, mobilizing loyalty by vowing to confront “elites” or defend a “genuine people” threatened by alien interests. In the U.S. setting described here, the rhetoric repeatedly leans on immediate diffusion through social media and conventional media to channel conflict, magnifying the sense that moderate stances are losing visibility.
From a democratic perspective, the greatest danger lies in the progressive weakening of institutional checks and balances. When the Executive repeatedly resorts to unilateral actions, the public realizes that other branches, especially Congress and the Judiciary, are relegated to secondary or merely reactive roles. This imbalance erodes citizens’ trust in the system’s functionality, intensifying suspicion that state instruments are being manipulated in favor of one faction or another. As a result, polarization grows, and the likelihood of legitimacy crises increases.
adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_T1_webcro805_stickypopup
Todavía no hay opiniones