
Analysis: A Macat Analysis of Steven Pinker's The Better Angels of Our Nature: Why Violence Has Declined
No se pudo agregar al carrito
Add to Cart failed.
Error al Agregar a Lista de Deseos.
Error al eliminar de la lista de deseos.
Error al añadir a tu biblioteca
Error al seguir el podcast
Error al dejar de seguir el podcast
$0.99/mes por los primeros 3 meses

Compra ahora por $6.95
No default payment method selected.
We are sorry. We are not allowed to sell this product with the selected payment method
-
Narrado por:
-
Macat.com
Acerca de esta escucha
Published in 2011, The Better Angels of Our Nature is a gloriously optimistic book. In it, well-known cognitive psychologist Steven Pinker put forward an argument that contradicted what most people believed at the time. Pinker said that despite humanity's biological tendency toward violence, we are, in fact, less violent today than ever before. To prove it, he laid out pages of detailed statistical evidence. For him, much of the credit for the decline goes to the Enlightenment, the important intellectual movement of 18th-century Europe. Enlightenment thinkers argued for ideas of liberty, tolerance, and respect for the value of human life. As those ideas filtered down through society, they affected the way people thought. That psychological change led to behavioral change - and overall we became more peaceful. But the book sparked a blazing debate. Some critics passionately disagreed that humanity could overcome the biological urge toward violence. Others argued that Pinker's statistics were too focused on the West, too limited, and even simply flawed. The debate still rages on.
©2016 Macat Inc (P)2016 Macat IncLo que los oyentes dicen sobre Analysis: A Macat Analysis of Steven Pinker's The Better Angels of Our Nature: Why Violence Has Declined
Calificaciones medias de los clientesReseñas - Selecciona las pestañas a continuación para cambiar el origen de las reseñas.
-
Total
-
Ejecución
-
Historia
- Phil Greene
- 12-12-17
Don't waste your time or money on this "analysis"
What could have made this a 4 or 5-star listening experience for you?
This analysis was incredibly redundant and covered little. Of the 103 minutes there is less than 20 minutes of worthwhile information. More time was spent on the background of the author than on the content of the book. The amount of time wasted saying "End of Module 2 section 7 ... Next up Module 2 section 8 pausing and then saying Module2 section 8" drove me crazy.
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Has calificado esta reseña.
Reportaste esta reseña
esto le resultó útil a 3 personas