Anónimo

Informative, but idealistically bias

Revisado: 04-08-25

There is a lot of information here that sheds a lot of much needed light on the conflict between Israel and the surrounding countries. The downside is that his arguments are bogged down by unrealistic ideals of how things could work, and over simplification of diplomatic situations. He also shows a certain bias against the Israeli government in the fact that he often dismisses their security concerns as well as distrust for those making the deals, and mentions them only as a foot note after making his case.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Extremely Boring

Revisado: 03-28-25

The author seems incapable of distinguishing between relevant, and interesting details of the stories he is telling. He goes off on tangents about people’s lives, before and after the incidents, that are neither interesting nor related to the story being told. The padding of this book with pointless uninteresting details, not to mention moral debates with himself about the value of the science, seems greatly unnecessary. There have to be millions of untold horrors committed in the name of science to fill this book; so why resort to padding the book with worthless, boring, unrelated details?

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Less Factual than Philosophical

Revisado: 03-13-19

It begins with pointless metaphors, followed by philosophical debate over the true history of China versus the legend. It bounces back and forth between the legend and the facts so frequently that it becomes difficult to distinguish between the two. I had to force myself to listen to it, and ultimately gave up on it.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 1 persona