Anónimo
- 2
- opiniones
- 2
- votos útiles
- 37
- calificaciones
-
Shakespeare's Sonnets
- De: William Shakespeare
- Narrado por: full cast
- Duración: 2 h y 32 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 27
-
Narración:4.5 out of 5 stars 24
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 23
Shakespeare's Sonnets are as important and vital today as they were when first published four hundred years ago. All 154 sonnets are read by an all star cast including Simon Callow, Kim Cattrall, Oliver Ford Davies, Stephen Fry, Sir Andrew Motion, Sian Philips, Diana Quick, Jemma Redgrave, Simon Russell Beale, Fiona Shaw, Sir Patrick Stewart, David Tennant and Dominic West. This recording is released alongside a spectacular edition of Shakespeare's Sonnets for the Apple iPad.
-
4 out of 5 stars
-
Multiple narrators
- De Aviram Rosochotsky en 10-13-16
- Shakespeare's Sonnets
- De: William Shakespeare
- Narrado por: full cast
Multiple narrators
Revisado: 10-13-16
Narrated by different individuals, some of which are better than others. These sonnets require some insight and restraint. It is not an emotional, romantic poetry; Not all narrators got it.
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Has calificado esta reseña.
Reportaste esta reseña
esto le resultó útil a 1 persona
-
Analysis: A Macat Analysis of Aristotle's Metaphysics
- De: Aiste Celkyte
- Narrado por: Macat.com
- Duración: 1 h y 45 m
- Versión completa
-
General3.5 out of 5 stars 11
-
Narración:4 out of 5 stars 9
-
Historia3 out of 5 stars 9
How many books can claim to be so influential as to inspire the development of a whole school of thought? The ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle's Metaphysics did exactly that, laying the foundations for a new branch of philosophy - metaphysics - concerned with the cause and nature of being.
-
2 out of 5 stars
-
Good basic information, but superficial and repetitive
- De Julius en 02-08-17
- Analysis: A Macat Analysis of Aristotle's Metaphysics
- De: Aiste Celkyte
- Narrado por: Macat.com
extremely and painfuly repetative, with very
Revisado: 09-22-16
very little actual analysis. Third man argument introduced 3 different times, neither of which is more than brief statement of the argument and nothing more. rudimentary statement of Aristotle 's concept of substance proliforate all over the text, no elaboration given. Individuals such as Ibn Sinna or Alexander of Afrodisias are introduced time and time again - with no actual elaboration. The criticism of Hume mentioned is completely meaningless (Hume rejected Aristotle's conception of substance beacuse it was not based on "evidence" - does that mean that Hume does not identify any argument in favor of this concept?! that is rediculus. The negligent and possibly ignorant author had probablty forgot that that should be "sense evidence".) And over and above all, this book is made of meaningless, painfuly repiting *praise* of the metaphysics. Time and Time again. Just empty praise regarding the 'metaphysics' "philosophical and historical" imporance. again. and again. and again. With no elaboration, and not even any change of formulation. (up to about 60 percent of it's duration, in fact, is just this meaningless praise repited. very very little analysis; god or bad.) Complete waste of time and money.
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Has calificado esta reseña.
Reportaste esta reseña
esto le resultó útil a 1 persona