Tabitha Olicshevis

Repetitive

Revisado: 02-24-25

He defends well the idea of plan A,B or C of how to approach the child, I loved the beginning of the book. But most of the books are Q&A structured and the answers keeps repeating themselves, in a way the authors keep playing the same key , defending the same principles , over and over again ( like I’ve just done right now), The principle is basic , I know it works, but the book was too long for its purpose.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Interesting

Revisado: 10-27-21

The voice of “Ina” is so robotic. It took time to get used to it. It’s a great book, though.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 1 persona

Good information

Revisado: 09-08-21

I was delighted with the first book. I’ve enjoyed every page. The performance of the first reader was AMAZING! ( with accents and voices). This book doesn’t seem like a continuation, but it’s like someone reading the summary.
It’s still informing anyways:)

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Amazing!!

Revisado: 05-27-21

It provides scientific information, social evolution, and at the Same time is warm and heartfelt. It seems to understand what parents struggle with.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Disorganised

Revisado: 04-03-21

One of the roles an editor is to order all the brainstorming, formatting and linking text, adding cohesion and coherence to a text and mainly, helping referencing papers, articles books and other authors. The author can be a great professional and have great knowledge on the subject, but only throwing ideas and author-knows- best phrases is quite dangerous for readers without previous preparation. Psychologists, neurocientists and other professionals spend their careers referencing orhers and studying kids, and when they give their opinions, it is with conscious and with care (I am thinking of “the whole brain child “book.) so this book is not for me.
Fun fact: on the first page of the book, there were so many loosen topics, that I genuinely though the person was reading the name of the chapters on the summary!lol

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

The duality of aconflicted damsel

Revisado: 02-05-21

I had so much expectations about Clarice. Yes, she has her way with the words. But it gets tiring to hear First World problems from a bourgeoisie, story after story. I understand she mocks society, but in a very snobbish way. Because her melancholy is so superior. How those damsels in her story search for their Liberty and feminism, and all marriages are like cages, and every men is so either empty or cruel. And at the same time, how helpless they are! (Yawning). It for boring fast.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 5 personas

it is a radio soap opera

Revisado: 11-29-20

The performance was laughable. Do you remember the soap operas from the 20's with the overreactions and exaggerated onomatopoeia? music themes used at all times...All the motivations extensively explained. a Psychologist who is not sure she has raised a psychopath until she was 15. and the list goes on.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Now I feel bad for her

Revisado: 09-01-20

From rising and shinning on her youth, to become overshawdown and sucked by a bigger star.
How to go up such a high montain when you don't even enjoy climbing?
How to accept a high school job after having 2 IVY league diplomas? and then get excited by gardenning? It seems she was so lost, but she has So much potential!
sometimes we don't choose our path. It chooses us, Wether we want it or not.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Read with cautious there are good and bad points

Revisado: 09-10-18

Was a pleasure to hear the first and last chapter of the book. The plot is prepared, however, a have a few issues with the development of core ideas. Some points are politically motivated, which make the position blurred, trying to redefine right and wrong without any empathy. And he misused the word legalism many times, nor knowing its definition, compromising the developments of ideas over a few chapters.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña