OYENTE

david donovan

  • 32
  • opiniones
  • 14
  • votos útiles
  • 89
  • calificaciones

This is my favorite current series

Total
4 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
4 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 09-03-24

Good narrator, And there is only one. Who has a gruff rouge voice. Ideal for an older man.

How this differs from the competition. And is a step above. Is that there is a lot of humor. Science Fiction without it is just a gore fest, ultimately not very interesting. The characters are well developed and act like humans, you know. Hating bureaucratic restriction from superiors, not in the field. Earth is not ever completely safe. But gets by, on bluff. The aliens are self interested. Individual aliens be allies or enemies. In that, it is much like Star Trek. It is formulaic only in that a series of events occur and the crew figures out how to resolve it. With somewhat complex plans. The series is long and you should start with the first book “Columbus Day” to understand how this book got to here.

I guess I just like the book and characters. They seem very human, instead of cardboard cut outs. But rarely give 5 stars. Enjoy!

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

This is a carefully crafted politically correct kids book

Total
3 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
4 out of 5 stars
Historia
3 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 05-20-23

It was free, so… I was hoping it would get better. The performances are good, but I got tired of the kids. So true Juvenile. If your kids are under 10. This the book for you.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

The narration makes you think this is a good story

Total
2 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
3 out of 5 stars
Historia
1 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 04-07-23

But… I guess I have to post like most. Give a one star. But… it is difficult to write a book. There are vaguely good elements, interesting topic (Mars). But as story telling, very very poor. If it intended to be satire. Or even humorous. That would be one thing. I write this as an opinion of a life long SF reader. There is no chance I will ever read a book by this author again. Sorry I wasted a credit on this.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 2 personas

Cool

Total
4 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
4 out of 5 stars
Historia
4 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 03-29-23

Good example of a short hard boiled detective science fiction story. Nice start for a series.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Reminds me a lot of “Legends of Tommorow”

Total
3 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
2 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 11-27-22

It is a story, full of tropes. Not that funny. And not much philosophy. The science, where present, is nonsense. So entertaining, but like chewing gum that lasts about 10 minutes. It could be any time in the past, present, or future. The only thing slightly entertaining are the relationship between character. It is worth what I paid for it, free.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 1 persona

The book is genius…

Total
4 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
3 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 04-27-22

But… The narrator, while clear, can’t seem to pronounce most of the Geologic time terms. Nor Ne Va Da. Not Ne Vaahhh Da. As a result it spreads ignorance. I recently saw the results in Outer Range. If you are a trained Geologist it is jarring.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

You know… this book really sucks.

Total
3 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
2 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 09-02-21

It is neither a short story collection nor a book. With at least 10 unrelated “main” characters. All 5 books / sections / chapters are good. It is RAH. But… they are defiantly unrelated. The narration is excellent.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

This Immortal Audiolibro Por Roger Zelazny arte de portada

Lord of Light doesn’t seem to be available in Audible, yet.

Total
4 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
4 out of 5 stars
Historia
4 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 06-28-21

This is NOT a dystopian novel. It was topical for 1966. And good for an early career work. It is about colonization. And… “magical spirts”.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

A much under appreciated series

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 06-28-21

This is the series that needs to be made into a movie or series. But maybe something else he wrote might be better. Like “Lord of Light”.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 1 persona

Interesting. This is a straight history based on the friends and family of John Hance.

Total
4 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
3 out of 5 stars
Historia
4 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 04-20-21

John Hance was famous as a liar / Tall Tale Teller. And, apparently, left few written records. Therefore this author created a history of “life after the Civil War” in Tennessee, Missouri, Kansas, New Mexico and Arizona. It is surprising who Hance was “probably” friends of and related to who, apparently, are better documented. Apparently it is not possible to reconstruct what John Hance’s stories like, except one or two, often repeated stories. But he was a “typical” AZ pioneer. Because I’m listening to the book, I wish the narrator would pronounce the names of the towns and rivers correctly. Rolle is “Rolla”, Gila is not “Gill-a”, and it was only said once. But Dine, (Dineh) was far from correct. Prescott was a mixed lot, in terms of pronunciation. That is; it was pronounced several different ways. Sometimes correctly, rhyming with Biscuit. However, the narration was very easy to listen to. No accent. He just should have better studied some place names.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_webcro768_stickypopup