OYENTE

Anónimo

  • 7
  • opiniones
  • 0
  • votos útiles
  • 21
  • calificaciones

perfect for anyone

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 02-03-25

concise yet comprehensive analysis if Iran in the second half of the 20th century.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

simply brilliant

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 09-27-24

comprehensive and detailed yet still clear, original and unbiased, must read for any WWII history buff

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Story of italian incompetence, pride and Its price

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 04-26-24

Perfect book for Great War enthusiasts about italian front, italian nationalism and sad absurdity od it all.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

robust and ubiased analysis

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 01-18-24

Marvelous work, full od details. Especially interesting was the part concerning preparations and Focus on atrittional nature of the battle without bias and ahistorical judgements

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

If only Forczyk was there in 1940, he would have made all the difference.

Total
3 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
2 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 01-06-24

All other historians are stupid, according to Forczyk. He claims, that France was not ill prepared for war, but then cites laments of french soldiers that they were prepared for 1918, not 1940. He also claims, that UK did nothing to disrupt German rearmament, yet admits that UK bought steel from Sweden and main problem of German rearmament was deficit of steel. Simply put, for all his criticism of others, his own conclusions do not correspond to his findings. Also the abbreviations are a little too much and sometimes confusing.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

pro Polish bias and omniscient Forczyk

Total
2 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
2 out of 5 stars
Historia
2 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 01-06-24

As Is his pitiful custom, Forczyk fills his otherwise interesting book with pro-polish bias such as "Britain had in 1940 still one important ally - Poland" and annoying critique of everything Churchill and other ally leaders (except the Polish) did. Benefit of hindsight does not bother him at all, he is so full of himself, that he could have won WWI and WWII singlehandedly. Also the Sealion makes only small portion of the book.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

subpar and biased

Total
3 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
2 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 08-13-23

Dry, biased, but most of all inconsistent. Autor arrives ať conclusions that do not arise from his oken text.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_webcro768_stickypopup