J. Harris

Psyching. Psyching Psyching

Revisado: 11-16-24

I keep wondering who has the movie rights. God after at least 25 reads and 10 listens I keep coming back to hear or read about Felix. I can't help but wonder is a movie made on this book out there, and You out there Felix actor to be?

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

The formula is getting tired as the repetitive writing

Revisado: 05-29-24

I'm an aural witness to a train wreck. No real editing, awful witless performance , audio track has many lines said twice, and I'm not sure it’s not as written. I held one hoping as time went on it could only get better, yet it's as if this was written and recorded in the same continuing session so there could be not possibility of improvement.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Reader needs to learn plurals.

Revisado: 05-26-24

when will the reader learn plurals that end in ves as in knives, lives, leaves,wives? every time I hear them it's like a slap in the face. I looked at the Kindle edition sample and the chapter on wolves spelled correctly. Even if it wasn't as a reader I would have mentally corrected this glaring Grammer error, every time without a second thought. that and looked up SERE to hear it's pronounced 'sear'. There were a few other mispronounced words but those are forgotten amount the dozens upon dozens of missed ves plurals. I write this while I'm listening to part 3 and wonder why no one corrected the reader. The things I did like was the misfortunes that befall people, the logistics, and how each fight wasn't easy or how none really came without a cost. one last note. firing weapons without ear protection will ruin your hearing footsteps in the forest hearing for awhile so you only have sight and smell left.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Grammer matters, and editing helps a lot

Revisado: 10-01-14

Would you say that listening to this book was time well-spent? Why or why not?

Better to listen to this while I'm working than spend my full attention reading it.

How did the narrator detract from the book?

The narrator does not understand that there are no such words as; wifes leafs and knifes. We in the english language pronounce these words with a 'V' and spell them as such: wives, leaves, and knives. I'm sure these were spelled correctly in the text and she was 100% wrong each time the opportunity to correctly read the text of these words came up. By chapter 8 I was yelling at my phone correcting the spoken word. Plus there were other editing mistakes, a sentence read twice in a row at least twice , and some obvious spoken word errors including a spoonerism. Where was the editing in this? , who listened to this work? Some of these should have been caught and cut out. Otherwise her dialect and inflections were more on the whiney side , and considering that the main characters were not of the whiney nature it only helped in the first few chapters.

If this book were a movie would you go see it?

Not really it's was a middling piece of word an example of some religion, some survivalism and some libertarian values. Patriots did a better version of all those things. The author spent to much on he said she said writing and the characters were a bit wooden with no potential for real growth.

Any additional comments?

Elizabeth Phillips negatively colored what I considered a marginal piece of work overall. She didn't do such a bad job that would really change my opinion of the work if I read it but she didn't give it a hand with an exciting read or error free read either.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña