OYENTE

GLYNN A

  • 37
  • opiniones
  • 60
  • votos útiles
  • 62
  • calificaciones

Not perfect but captivating

Total
4 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
4 out of 5 stars
Historia
4 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 04-28-25

Clockwork and clairvoyance. Suspend disbelief on both. Atmospheric period piece. Worth trying. Not exactly the steampunk I'd thought it would be. A bit weird. Seems to break some storytelling protocols - a bit of an "oh so that's it?" ending.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Dated - not really suited to a modern audience

Total
1 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
1 out of 5 stars
Historia
1 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 04-02-25

Tedious. Just awful. Yes it's a period piece but the story telling is glacially paced with ridiculously antiquated dialog. The narrator is a caricature of Noel Coward Wilde. One presumes the he's holding cigarette holder throughout. "I simply must write a play about that daaahling".

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

A benchmark. - fantastic

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 12-06-24

Brilliant story. Hugh Fraser is the tops! Superb voice characterizations. The plot us a paragon. Ingenious and surprising.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Dreadfully dated awful story

Total
1 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
4 out of 5 stars
Historia
1 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 07-26-24

Christie wrote great mysteries. This is some kind of defecion - scientist pool conspiracy. You start with an open mind but conclude it is just awful.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Perhaps the best Gunther

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 11-09-23

Complex story and super characterization. I have The Third Man in mind picturing Vienna. John Lee us superb.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Excellent but needs editing down

Total
4 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
4 out of 5 stars
Historia
3 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 11-02-23

Oppenheimer did not invent the atom bomb. This gives a fuller history. Who has heard of Szilard? Great minds like Fermi and Bohr made some very bad assessments. If you like obscure detail you'll love this book. Otherwise it needs editing down to give it better pace. We do not really need to know how many times a letter was written, how many versions kept and and which train it was carried to Washington. What really is enlightening is how Sachs, a non-scientist, delivered the gist of the letter to Roosevelt. The "Einstein letter" would have been an unintelligible read and its time critical message might have been missed.
In summary - some real gems but you have to stick with it.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Great legal procedural

Total
4 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
4 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 09-23-23

No complaints. Well maybe too much legal procedure. Ending a bit gratuitous. I liked The Testament more. I think I feel a bit let down by the story ending.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Do not listen the dust jacket

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 09-03-23

Very clever but slow at first. The dust jacket gives too much away. Skip to the real Chapter 1 to enjoy.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

The Right Perspective

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 08-31-23

Collins was the real human being who went to the moon and returned. intelligent and informative. As fresh as 60 years ago.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Good in parts

Total
3 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
3 out of 5 stars
Historia
3 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 08-07-23

Good pace and feeling of technical credibility initially. I thought this was going to be a real winner. Then suddenly the plot veered into the implausibly far-fetched. I mean we're messing around near a Russian spacecraft then it's "Get back in in 30 seconds we're blasting off for the moon!". Sorry having listened to exciting non-fiction accounts of Apollos 11 and 13 this is too "comic book". It's a shame - I was disappointed. Maybe I'm allowing implausibility to get in the way. I was expecting more Apollo 13 and got Moonraker.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_webcro768_stickypopup