wordlywork

good but a bit disappointing

Revisado: 05-26-21

after Pick' s many adventure in romance, the quick and unsatisfying resolution with the widow Babs was a disappointment. also would like to have known more about McCoy's exploits behind enemy lines... we're not with him...we hear reported info. I think that Griffin just got tired and decided to close it up. And the Truman- McCarthy clash was not convincingly handled.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

potential to be better

Revisado: 08-20-19

is this historical or invented? romanticized writing, occasionally tedious, struggling to make its point. edit by 1/3 reduction and schmalz.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Promise unfulfilled

Revisado: 05-22-17

What did you like best about Lilac Girls? What did you like least?

This could have been a solid read, but the characters did not engage me, and the relationships that they formed were mostly unbelievable, as was the tortured plot to get them in the same place. I became very frustrated with their interactions, and longed for some strong, insightful reflections written with style and grace. I gave up about half-way through and did not finish it.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 1 persona

great insight into a long neglected American story

Revisado: 04-13-17

thought provoking and insightful reflection unravelling the influence that family and culture have on children of the working class, told with personal examination and sociological research. definitely worth the read.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

potential unrealized

Revisado: 10-14-16

compelling topic but judgmental tone mars understanding. needs balance, background and edit to half length.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 1 persona

Hedda: Harpy or Harbinger?

Revisado: 04-23-12

If you could sum up Hedda Gabler in three words, what would they be?

Conflicted Courageous Anti-hero

What other book might you compare Hedda Gabler to and why?

The Awakening by Kate Chopin--Both women, trapped by societal conventions, chose not to succumb to that pressure, nor to follow a moral low road, nor to suffer from financial depredations in order to direct their lives; instead, they both chose death, seeing it as the only honorable fate still within their power to shape their personal fulfillment.

Have you listened to any of Flo Gibson’s other performances before? How does this one compare?

Listening to this play brought it vividly to life on the stage of my mental theater.

Did you have an extreme reaction to this book? Did it make you laugh or cry?

Hedda is complicated. She saw herself as being able to direct her own life, her own choices, and was encouraged to do so by a General-father who tutored her in pistolry and made possible her wild abandon-love of horse-riding--two very masculine activities in an age when women were cloistered inside homes and tea rooms. And she drinks--with the men. She longs to hold the power to direct her life with the reigns in her hands: but marriage, a scholarly, emasculated husband; his stifling, conventional, elderly aunt; and the ultimate bit in her teeth, a judge--respected by all, yet morally compromised--who holds her in a kind of mental blackmail--all combine to corner this fiercely independent woman. As a result, she spirals. It's a kind of all-or-nothing mental claustrophobia that pressures her to act on equally reckless, amoral decisions, wreaking havoc in the lives of all around her, and ultimately destroying herself. It's like a Greek tragedy, where Medea goes wild, having had all around her deny her rights to family and children in favor of social order and the state. But here, Hedda's outrage is that she cannot decide for herself.

With 21st century eyes, it's easy to judge Hedda for not choosing a direction for her energies that were easily within her means: an academic life, or a life for social justice--but no intellectual, she desired that outdoor boldness and physicality that she's never allowed to revisit, once she's trapped like a bird inside her new prison-home. We could see her as selfish, self-centered, immoral--and certainly those views are justified. However, she does stand as a harbinger, in the 19th century, for the winds of feminist change about to unleash themselves in the next 100 years; and the assertion here is her undeniable desire to direct her own life, no matter what the moral compass or conventional direction that would be imposed on her.

The fact that she is so amoral and so self-determining seemingly echoes a faint ring of Nietsche's Superman, which was beginning to sound in the consciousness of Europe.

What a strange symbolism is created in this improbable woman. Even in this post-feminist era, we are still haunted by her fury. Her appearance on the European stage must surely have evoked waves of outrage.

Any additional comments?

She irritated me. For someone so creative, with so many talents and the economic means to channel them, she surely could have solved her own problem. Yet she's like a petulant, spoiled child, stamping her feet, and recklessly kicking all the men and women who surround her until she brings them all down. Vine leaves or no, pursuit of beauty or no-- a lover of self-determination with a powerful will, Hedda represents that uncompromising rage that informs anger, violence, and destruction when there are other decisions and actions that could contribute to a livable solution. There are options where individualism and the good of the whole can live side by side.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña