Dclneuro

Simple writing

Revisado: 04-21-24

Loved her first book. This story was. Nice concept. But more like a young adult novel level.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Cliche dialog, formulaic

Revisado: 03-21-24

Cliche dialog, formulaic

Some ok moments. The reader’s cadence made it worse sometimes, his accents and voices for different people were good at times. But the low deep and gruff voices were goofy.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 1 persona

Too much dialog

Revisado: 09-07-22

A lot of unnecessary dialog. And characters not very interesting. Story was ok, but largely irrelevant. It was mostly about characters speaking to each other. Reader had a cool accent, but aside from gruff vs normal voice most normal voice characters sounded like the same person. It may be accurate that the author portrays a realistic account of police work. Probably why it’s dull.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Started out pretty good

Revisado: 11-02-21

By midway the wheels started falling off for me. The trust issues became ridiculous and the Rambo stuff became too much. If the main villains identity wasn’t so obvious, so early I would have been more keen on finishing.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 6 personas

No depth

Revisado: 10-29-21

Characters are bland, 1 dimensional.
Story is mildly interesting. Some of the ways that trouble is avoided was creative. But there characters don’t draw me in. Prince’s family situation was a nice touch, but then it’s pretty much a non factor for the rest of the story.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Good reader, almost worth it

Revisado: 10-24-21

The reading was great and kept me going until nearly the end. The story was more of a Hollywood movie script. Hannibal Lecter style. I did like the character development, though the characters did not seem much like detectives, more like office workers. But like real people, which was nice.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 1 persona

What is with all the racism, etc?

Revisado: 08-30-20

Is there something funny about racism in Sweden or it particular to this author, or the characters? Doesn’t translate well. Story is pretty good despite.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Cliche filled

Revisado: 05-13-20

Full of cliches. The narrator was not bad. But hard to listen to nonetheless. Not much character development or story. The weaving together was interesting at times. But ending was a cheezball of coincidence.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Main character tough to listen to

Revisado: 04-09-20

The reader is good, but as the narrator of the story the main character is an a-hole and hard to listen to. Perhaps the story or character become more balanced later in the book, but 3 hours I. I’ve had to put it down.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Nice story

Revisado: 03-06-20

Great reader, nice story. My only issue is with the use of ‘outdoorsman’ to describe homeless people in LA. Narrator claims that’s a term given to transients in LA. As an LA native, I’ve never heard that term.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña