halo82x

facts and reason

Revisado: 03-21-25

I sought the truth. I found Christianity to be true. Therefore, I am a Christian. Shalom 🙏✝️❤️

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Yeshua HaMashiach

Revisado: 03-14-25

Taoism talks a lot about Jesus without even mentioning His name. Once one realize the Truth, one can not even contemplate the Way, the Truth, or the Life without recognizing that He is Jesus. Shalom 🙏✝️❤️

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

still uneducated

Revisado: 02-04-25

i sat through this whole book hoping and praying for Kevin Powell. unfortunately Kevin Powell is still uneducated, ignorant and arrogant. I will continue to pray for Kevin Powell. shalom 🙏✝️❤️

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

the author is no scientist

Revisado: 01-29-25

someone should remind the author that he is not a scientist, biologist, or engineer. his phd is in asian history and it is clear that he is ignorant of all else. he grossly misrepresents all other american and world history.

i honestly thought this would be an interesting book. i was mistaken. it is nothing more than progressive fear mongering and propaganda. the author virtually suggests that the conservative minded need to get with the program or risk being snuffed out. he simultaneously accuses this potential conservative resistance of being akin to nazism. really? his side are thr one's making the threat.

the progressives are the one's who often, if not always, use fear mongering and deception to promote, perpetuate, and propagate their rhetoric and agendas. despicable.

fyi, I'm not defending the other side here. this is an objective take on this book.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

nothing

Revisado: 01-27-25

negative stars
I would have to write a book of greater length just to address this. I will not be doing that.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

some nuggets and info. biased and subjective.

Revisado: 11-05-24

Very biased, selective and subjective perspective on Jesus and scripture. There are some good nuggets and information presented, but it is wholly tainted by her biases. I was initially quite interested, but the book went way downhill and fast after the first 2-3 chapters. Don't be fooled by the author's apparent woke Catholic, pseudo-enlightened, pseudo-intellectual, biased perspective. It is quite misguided and ignores all scripture which challenges her views. Take heed. Shalom 🙏✝️❤️

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

facts

Revisado: 07-10-24

I have no real criticism of the book itself. However, after reading many of the critical reviews of this book, I noticed a pattern emerge. Almost every single critical review of "Darwin's Black Box" either has an extremely biased perspective against creation and/or they fail to differentiate between micro-evolution and macro-evolution. Perhaps this is not by accident.

Behe's goal is not to disprove evolution. The point of the book is to show the fragility of Darwinism. Read more carefully.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 1 persona

honestly

Revisado: 06-11-24

Thomas Sowell speaks truth about race, statistics, economics and political ideology. I strongly recommend this book.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

good but relatively ambiguous

Revisado: 05-23-24

I enjoyed the book, overall. I think there were some irrational presuppositions that could need reviewing. It is possible that one of the authors other publications covers these points. A few of the authors conclusions didn't sit quite right with me. As the author had said, there could be some bias in some of his conclusions. I believe that there was. It was still a good read (listen).

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 1 persona

scientific conjecture and atheistic bias

Revisado: 05-22-24

The steady state theory has since been rejected. However, some aspects are being resurrected to some effect.

Evolution is not fact. it is merely scientific fact. What is the difference? Consensus.

According to Sagan, God is not only not necessary but shouldn't even be a consideration. I enjoy science, but this is just naive.

I've already forgotten more about actual science than this books has offered on its behalf. Considering when it was written, it is a decent read.

I have more to say, but I don't think I have the patience nor the energy to elaborate any further.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 1 persona