Scaht

Good story

Revisado: 01-27-25

Good story and well read but would really benefit from additional narrators. The depth of character development with this many characters is just too much for one person.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

just another garbage insurance pitch

Revisado: 01-03-23

terrible, terrible way to try and convince somebody that whole life insurance is a good investment in today's market. a volatility shield. ridiculous.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Pure garbage

Revisado: 01-05-22

Unbelievably bad. I was going to get a refund for it, but then others might make the mistake of purchasing it. Don't waste your time or money.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Disappointing

Revisado: 01-03-22

Stefan and Gabrielle are excellent narrators. Unfortunately, there were too many others that weren't quite as good. Minimally, reviewing, editing, and proofing should verify that pronunciations are similar between narrators. For example, sometimes the word cache was used; other times the word sachet was used. One of the narrators consistently refused to recognize the letter r in various words; including the name Arthur. The accents very greatly among the narrators, and work far too inconsistent. Sometimes Alvin and Margaret had deep Southern accents. Other times, no accents. French accents often contained Southern drawl and mispronunciations. Story development was deeply lacking. Character development was worse. There was too much repeating of events from previous books in the series. repeating events from previous books. Once would be understandable, but repeating the same events over and over comes across as padding.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Terrible

Revisado: 10-30-21

Too many problems to list. Just a sampling: within the first few chapters you're told that when you own dividend stocks, you don't own any shares in the company. There are multiple chapters that are less than 2 minutes in length. he says it may take years before you see a return on your money, and the larger the investment, the better, and so on.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Garbage

Revisado: 10-30-21

If you're reading this review to find out if this book will help you, you're already too smart for this book; unless of course you're looking for a financial planner to keep repeating how important a financial planner is, while also repeating how great a variable annuity is. I simply can't trust someone that believes stock diversification is achieved through investing in different stock markets. I also have trouble believing in someone that is willing to extoll the virtues of Bitcoin as an investment while you're retired. Beyond that, I also have a personal problem having faith in someone that believes the letter k exists in the word etcetera.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Don't bother

Revisado: 10-27-21

If you're new to the ideas and concepts of consciousness, and you've already purchased this book, you may get something out of it. However, if you haven't already purchased this book, it would probably be best for you to simply search audible for the term consciousness, and then make this book your second choice in your list. Your first choice should be any other.
Areas for improvement:
The same concepts repeated endlessly, the word "altogether" used altogether too often, disorganized thoughts and concepts,
using pointers throughout after having explained that pointers are bad, and many other instances of self-contradiction.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Horrible.

Revisado: 03-01-21

Clearly, nobody explained the difference between narration and reciting to Jerry Seinfeld. I would have thought that whoever wrote this garbage might have done that.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 1 persona

Tolerate the narration

Revisado: 11-11-16

Great concept and practice. Horrible narration. The whole thing would have been half the length if the "sweetheart"s, "angel"s, etc. would have been edited out. Very, very difficult to listen to.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 1 persona

I wasted my money so you don't have to.

Revisado: 10-31-16

Exceptionally poor "spewer" of other work. Lude, rude, and crude regurgitation of Hill, Allen, Tolle, and many others. Although there were many of the greats quoted [ripped off], I was unable to get beyond the illiterate reading.
Etcetera... NOT Ekcetera.
Couldn't care less... NOT Could care less.
EKCETERA...
Terrible. Spend your money on other, more well-known authors, that had original thoughts, and were able to communicate them without vulgarity. And to illustrate just how vulgar: I'm a born-and-raised Chicago south-sider, and I found it too vulgar.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 78 personas