J. Scott

Unbalanced Information

Revisado: 08-30-22

I wish that this author had presented more balanced perspectives of both the green energy sector and the oil/coal/nuclear energy sector. She demonizes the oil, coal and nuclear energy sectors and fails to mention or acknowledge the indigenous land, populations and communities around the world that are currently being impacted by the United States’ demand for green/clean energy products.

It is not difficult to find information regarding the destruction of indigenous people‘s land in countries like Peru or the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). And it is happening right now. We have a severe problem in United States where if we don’t see energy production happening in our own cities or our backyards then it doesn’t impact us at all or affect our livelihood. The reality remains that even though California is not burning coal they are still using it for more than 50% of their electricity. They are still draining the Colorado river despite all of the laws and bills to stop damning water flow into the ocean. Just because it is not happening in your own state does not mean that it isn’t happening in someone else’s state or in another country.

In the US’s fight to stop climate change, they’re pushing ever greater amounts of green energy technologies, which are built on human misery and literally mountains of toxic waste.

Amnesty International and numerous media outlets have conducted research and reported stories showing most of the cobalt required for the batteries needed for US’s big electric vehicle push comes from small mines in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). Cobalt is a necessary metal in the rechargeable batteries that power almost every electronic device in the world today, including cellphones, laptop computers, tablets, electric vehicles, and the magnets used in wind turbines.

The DRC produces more than half of the cobalt used today—more than all the other countries in the world combined.

The government of the DRC has a terrible record of human rights abuses. Many of the workers in the country’s cobalt mines are enslaved or virtually enslaved tribe children. UNICEF estimated more than 40,000 children work in mines in the DRC, where hundreds, if not thousands, die in cave-ins and other mine accidents and from mining-related illnesses every year. Most of this cobalt is produced for, or purchased by, Chinese conglomerates operating in the DRC. Often, the cobalt is shipped to China, where it’s refined and put into all manner of electronic gadgets from cell phones to fighter jet display systems.

And it’s not just batteries for electric cars and battery backup for solar and wind industrial facilities that are built on slavery and human misery. Research from Sheffield Hallam University in the United Kingdom reports that a single province in China produces 45 percent of the polysilicon that makes up solar panels, the majority of which are assembled in China. The polysilicon and solar panels are produced by Uyghur Muslims under a huge forced-labor regime.

Solar panels are in huge demand because of climate change,” reports the BBC, discussing the study. “The global production of solar panels is using forced labour from China’s Uyghur Muslims in Xinjiang province. … The [polysilicon] is obtained under a massive system of coercion.”

Cobalt and polysilicon are just two of the myriad minerals, metals, and composites underpinning all modern electronics for which the world depends on China and other oppressive regimes. Unless the Biden-Harris administration, other U.S. Democratic Party leaders, and the heads of other developed countries change course, child and slave labor will become even more prevalent, because each and every green energy technology they’re pushing for depends on these minerals and elements.

Huge amounts of earth must be mined to extract the sparsely spaced minerals and elements needed to create the batteries powering electric cars, as well as providing supplementary power when the wind isn’t blowing or the sun not shining. The refining of these minerals produces a toxic sludge that poisons adjacent and downstream peoples and environments.

Lithium is the lighter of all metals, and it is a crucial component in the production of batteries for laptops, smartphones, and the growing market of electric cars. According to "The United States Geological Survey in recent years, the global demand of lithium has skyrocketed, and its production tripled from 2015 to 85,000 tons by 2018" (BBC, 2019). Also, in 2018, the global market price of this mineral per one metric ton was 17 000 USD on average. This land in Peru was taken away by the government after the United States approached the Peruvian government for access to use their land for lithium production. Which poisons the ground water and the earth making it unusable for thousands of years. The United States did this knowingly because the Peruvian government could produce lithium at a lower cost and with less interference from the EPA.

Then there’s the huge waste problem being created by the push for green energy.

Even more energy-intensive mining and manufacturing are necessary to create the composite materials of which wind turbine blades and towers are formed. Massive amounts of energy are used to create and transport the tens of thousands of tons of carbon dioxide-intensive concrete necessary to anchor each wind turbine. Vast amounts of land, most often prime view areas, wildlife habitat, and migratory corridors, are transformed into energy-producing industrial parks when wind “farms” and vast solar arrays are erected.

And the results are huge piles of toxic trash when batteries, wind turbines, and solar panels fail prematurely or simply cease working at the end of their anticipated useful lives, which are difficult to process, recycle, or dispose of. Because of the way they’re assembled and the materials they’re made with, lithium-ion batteries are difficult to recycle. Attempting to disassemble a battery for recycling can result in a short-circuit, explosion, and fire that releases toxic fumes.

Yet, absent recycling, the millions of electric vehicle batteries that manufacturers expect to produce over the next few decades will wind up in landfills, taking up huge amounts of space in conditions that can result in the release of toxins, including heavy metals.

Even before US (Biden Administration) began its big push to expand the use of electric vehicles and wind and solar industrial energy facilities, cities and states were already struggling to deal with the mounting waste from disabled wind turbines and solar panels.

Municipalities running certified landfills are increasingly rejecting wind turbine blades, even when they can charge double the amount per ton for accepting them, because they take up tremendous amounts of space, must be crushed at considerable expense, require hundreds of years to break down, and often release methane and volatile organic compounds into the environment. Nor can they be recycled, because they’re made of a composite of resin, fiberglass, and other materials.

The sheer waste of human lives specifically indigenous people’s lives, freedom, and resources for the left’s climate obsession is appalling. Exploiting the most vulnerable people and environments of the world in the vain hope of preventing a minuscule sea level rise and slightly warmer temperatures in the world 100 years from now is unwise and morally bankrupt.

Or how San Francisco based water developing company, Bechtel bought up Bolivia’s indigenous land to outsource water. And privatize the water to the point where indigenous people couldn’t afford to drink the water from their land. In 1997, the World Bank made privatization of the public water system of Bolivia's third largest city, Cochabamba, a condition of the country receiving further aid for water development. Within weeks of taking over the city's water, Bechtel's Bolivian company, Aguas del Tunari, raised rates by more than 50 percent and in some cases even higher. Fortunately, in April 2000, Bechtel was forced to leave the country and the water company was returned to public ownership. Here we have another American (Californian) based company destroying indigenous land outside of the California. Just because California has made it virtually impossible to dam up rain water that flows into the Pacific doesn’t mean that it stops needed water or isn’t using it. That water comes from somewhere. And guess what? It’s destroying another indigenous group.

This author pushes for green energy and makes an argument in favor of green energy production but somewhere in the world (maybe not the US) an indigenous community or under represented community is suffering at the hand of the United States.

Oil, nuclear, coal, wind, solar, etc…they’re all negativity impacting communities all over the world.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 13 personas