OYENTE

Anónimo

  • 2
  • opiniones
  • 0
  • votos útiles
  • 2
  • calificaciones

Not a professional or objective writer

Total
1 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
1 out of 5 stars
Historia
1 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 05-03-25

Overall the content seems to have many assumptions and personal views. The tone was angry and not enjoyable. Even at the beginning where she sweet over the pictures taken of Michel Jackson private areas. She described him as uncooperative and that he was able to get away with a good treatment because of his status. I wonder how she would react if police arrives at her home to take pictures of her vagina without her knowing the reasons. Famous people might get away with many things but they are also extorted more than anyone. This case was already solved by the incompetent journalist and the media even before Michael Jackson had the chance to tell his story. This is clearly a one sided subjective story made to continue to extract money from Michael Jackson even after death. Is clear that the persecution will never end even after years of FBA investigation and been acquitted in trial, even after no evidence been found. It’s is scary how some people is obsessed with someone to the extremes.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Not Respectful to Michael Jackson Kids

Total
3 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
3 out of 5 stars
Historia
2 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 03-21-25

She is very creative and use very descriptive language. She incorporates elements of history, racism, exploitation of young artists by the parents, managers music industry and media mafia. She also have ability to bring the collective questions that both sides- the ones that believe MJ is innocent, the ones that believe he is guilty and the ones in between have and the possible answers. Overall she is a clever writer. In regards to MJ, I still believe that she left many open ended question that already have an answer at this time. A man that was prosecuted to the extent that MJ wad is at this time innocent based on the evidente . What it looks like, opinions the fact that he put himself in vulnerable positions probably due to mental illness can not be extrapolated to this point that he was a child abuser. She also ignored the persons that knew him closely and worked with him, which usually present him and acknowledge how surprising was that he really was like a normal hardworking guy, funny, extremely smart, great father, kind, insecure, scare of the harm others can do to him for money... At this point, she like many others are using Michael Jacksons name to make profit or gain a reputation. She became part of the ones that she criticized often in the book she wrote, also exploiting him. Also she never meet him. He was 10 years invested by FBI and California, Santa Barbara police department; no evidence was found. She should honor the results of the investigations and put the weight that it have, which is not present in the book, because a man and his 3 children were put though hell, by what it seems a group of greedy and judgmental individuals.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_webcro805_stickypopup