Reagan Kelly

I wish I had purchased the actual book rather than the audiobook

Revisado: 08-28-15

First, the good. The book is a serious attempt to view war from the perspective of those who experienced it. It is very much not a story about great men - they are mentioned but not dwelt on. Instead the author draws on diaries and accounts of events in towns and villages and the countryside during a war and does an excellent job of conveying the horribleness of war's effect on the population. He clearly has a point of view and expresses it, but it's hard to listen to many of the truly awful accounts he quotes and not sympathize.

Now for the bad. The narrator is awful. I have listened to many books and have suffered through some bad narrators, but this is on an entirely new level. He seems incapable of pronouncing words correctly. A few examples I noted today during about 1.5 hours of listening.

Cill-ih-see-ah - for the location Silesia (Sigh-lee-see-ah or Sigh-lee-zha)
Back-ill-us - for the word "bacillus"
Nah-vair for "Navarre"
Cath-lick-ism for "Catholicism"
Veh-nal for "venal"

If I could give the performance 0 stars I would. I wish I'd purchased the e-book or the physical book. I would probably come back and re-read it, but I definitely can't listen to this reading of this book again

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 5 personas

Well-narrated, brilliant story

Revisado: 11-22-12

This is a classic sci-fi novel, and possibly the best first contact novel ever. The narration is superb, with distinctive voicing. I listen to exclusively non-fiction on Audible, and this novel opened my eyes to the potential of fiction in audio.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

A fascinating book marred by poor narration and en

Revisado: 04-05-12

This is an exquisitely detailed, meticulously researched account of the life of an important scientist. I cannot say enough about the material. The authors are obviously sympathetic to Oppenheimer, but that is probably an unavoidable consequence of the research necessary to do a good job, and when they come across something unpleasant they don't make excuses for him. It's clear why this book won the Pulitzer.

That said, the narration and production of the book are considerably sub-par. Significant and frequent changes in volume and recording quality make you think that this was done over a weekend with no time for re-takes. Much of the time the narrator is fine, but he struggles with foreign names and is extremely inconsistent in his pronunciation of more technical words.

The work is so fascinating to me that I was able to make it through, but I can understand that not everyone might be able to do the same. Think about your capacity to deal with poor production before buying.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Fascinating book marred by production errors

Revisado: 03-02-10

First, this book is fascinating and engrossing, neatly following the birth of the New York City Medical Examiner's office and the creation of forensic medicine as a science in America. The book is organized into chapters covering both a short span of time (usually a year or two) and a particular poison that figures prominently into cases from that time.

The audio production itself, however, suffers from frequent mispronunciations of words and occasional changes of meaning from inopportune pauses by the narrator. It's as though the narrator did the book in a single take and no one bothered to listen to it with an appropriately critical ear. If it weren't for this the book would rate five stars from me.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 86 personas