OYENTE

WESTON TAYLOR

  • 1
  • revisión
  • 2
  • votos útiles
  • 1
  • clasificación

WIKIPEDIA IS NOT VALID AS A REFERENCE EVER

Total
1 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
1 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 07-29-19

WIKIPEDIAis NOT VALID as REFERENCE NOR WILL IT EVER BE SINCE for 1; its editable by anyone from anywhere (meaning I could for exmple change the name of a mental illness like Bipolar to "Occasional Psychopathic disorder" & anyone who can get to the site Wikipedia has the ability add or delete anything and write whatever they want and it will stay with the potentially dangerous incorrect information for days weeks or months depending on when the Wiki employees catch the incorrect info. I appreciate your story but really really I hope youve not used the DSM5 or any previous version to self diagnose or tell others what illnesses you think they may or may not have 'unless you're a current licensed/
board certified Physician recognized by the US federal gov. At the very minimum medical Journals as well as a reputable dictionary & published scholarly journals should have been used to site "Facts"
In anvanced college prep writing in 2004 as a HS senior amwe could only use professional published journals in 2004. Then at University of Wisconsin until 2008 my peers and me would be put on scademic probation if we attempted using WIKIPEDIA which was viewed as false info and considered plagerism since the info was not based on studies but rather opinions of random people who were able to edit as they wished . very misleading.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 1 persona

adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_webcro805_stickypopup