OYENTE

AmazonCustomer

  • 6
  • opiniones
  • 1
  • voto útil
  • 58
  • calificaciones

Inaccurate, full of quotes by Grant cronies

Total
1 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
4 out of 5 stars
Historia
1 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 09-26-20

There are no good audiobooks on Meade and until there are, the only book that comes close to representing Meade’s true contributions in the war is Isaac Rusling Pennypacker’s, Great Commanders General Meade, 1901. There is money in the continuing promotion of Grant, Sherman, Sheridan, Lee, Forrest, and Jackson but this is capitalism and 19th century politics at work not history. The tedious comments on his looks and temper are so incredibly shallow and misrepresentative of this great general’s worth that this book isn’t worth it even for free.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

More balanced than later works

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 09-26-20

Early in my studies, having read Bruce Catton and Shelby Foote, I was put off by McFeely’s biography and set it aside reading Jean Edward Smith instead. Now having read Carswell McClellan and many other primary source books disputing Grant’s Memoirs, I find it a much more accurate narrative than later books that have glossed over his failings and tend to create an over the top mythical Grant. Although author is criticized for his speculations on Grant’s psychological states it seems now an interesting and fair enough appraisal. I enjoyed audiobook format very much.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

A Texan writes about Meade

Total
3 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
3 out of 5 stars
Historia
2 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 12-12-19

This is a standard dismissal of George Gordon Meade’s generalship that ruins an otherwise fine telling of the movements and challenges of pursuing an army through mountain passes. Like a Monday night quarter back he sees only the possibilities of some grand strategic offensive that he concludes Meade was incapable of navigating. Easy to contend since Lee did get away but so simplistic a mindset and poorly supported by the facts that it’s distracting.
The premise that Meade was ineffective rests first on the fact that he did not bring Lee to battle at Williamsport. He thanks Kent Masterson Brown in his acknowledgments but one wonders if he read his book. The author concludes: “A potential (and it is important to stress that word) opportunity to destroy Lee at Williamsport had been squandered, and the chance to potentially cut off and wreck a portion of his army in the Valley was also missed. An even greater and more realistic chance to beat the Rebels to the Rappahannock or Rapidan was lost as well.”
The author simply ignores recent scholarship by both Kent Masterson Brown (read his description of entrenchments pg. 310-312) and Eric Wittenberg on the pursuit after Gettysburg. Starting with the erroneous and tired premise that Meade “squandered” an opportunity to defeat Lee at Williamsport is a poor place to start the narrative and he keep using this to bolster his argument that Meade was a cautious, General who “took counsel of his fears” and had no strategic vision. I was very disappointed with the author’s intrusive assessment of a general in command of his army for just three days, who then fought and won a bloody victory over the Civil War’s most audacious and aggressive general that even with Grant at the helm was not defeated until eighteen months later. There is very little military appreciation for the comparative ease of escaping in general. One could ask why Grant and Sherman did not pursue the Confederates immediately after Shiloh having been reinforced by Buell or for that matter, why stop pursuing Bragg after Chattanooga.
Let the reader come to our own conclusions based on the facts presented, that is all I’m asking. I respectfully recognize the author’s research and skill of presentation but I submit his assessments were too heavy handed.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

The Half Has Never Been Told Audiolibro Por Edward E. Baptist arte de portada

An original and mind blowing work

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 03-09-19

This book is so original in its organization and powerful in its message that some will be confused and uncomfortable. I read the book before listening to this incredible narration and marveled at the control in his voice, the cadence that so perfectly captures the rhythm of industrialized slavery. Should be required reading for all.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Gettysburg Audiolibro Por Stephen Sears arte de portada

My second read and enjoyed it immensely

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
4 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 10-26-18

I don’t agree with absolutely everything Sears has written about the great battle but I think he captures the essence and it would be nit picking to dissect such a wonderful book and find fault. He gives a very fair characterization of both Lee and Meade. His treatment of the 11th Corp is the standard viewpoint and I would urge readers to read James Pula’s two volume books on the 11th Corp for balance. Perhaps people emphasize Gettysburg too much but I don’t think so. It is a perfectly beautiful battlefield to walk and all the elements of battle seem to engage one there, the enormity of it, the carnage, the complexity of the three day struggle. For me Gettysburg represents that ultimate contest that was the Civil War. The audiobook is a great way to review information a second time around.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Author has a vendetta against Meade

Total
1 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
3 out of 5 stars
Historia
1 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 10-20-18

The author makes no pretense of presenting an unbiased account of the battle or letting reader come to their own conclusions about the key players in the battle. It is very readable for anyone without a Civil War background but for anyone remotely familiar with the facts this psycho babble will feel like someone dragging their nails across a black board. Torture!!!! I hated this book. The narrator sounds just like the author.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_webcro805_stickypopup