OYENTE

:

  • 1
  • revisión
  • 2
  • votos útiles
  • 1
  • clasificación

Sophomoric and stilted

Total
1 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
1 out of 5 stars
Historia
1 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 02-06-23

I stopped listening after Chapter 2 due to several off-based assertions. There were several but I’ll pick on one.

Income inequality is due to a failure of “the system” a.k.a. Capitalism. This is not only untrue, but in direct conflict with his previous statements - how capitalism lifted millions of people out of poverty in the previous century. Apparently capitalism works phenomenally well (unprecedented in the history of the world according to the author) when viewed after several decades, but fails when viewed presently.

His premise fails to address the very nature of capitalism and how it accomplished all that it has - through competition and meritocracy which leverage inequality, while at the same time increasing the standard of living for everyone, and paradoxically decreasing the overall inequality.

No one on the planet goes to the store and picks the lesser product suffering from inequality to correct the "injustice". His premise ignores the real reasons for income inequality in those communities - disproportionate higher rates of - single motherhood, deadbeat fathers, child illiteracy, youth incarceration. There's no amount of free money you can throw at those kinds of issues to solve them.

Capitalism is not a free ride - there's a cost to the individual. But it provides the same way out for poor people today, as it has for millions in the past - through hard work, adding value to yourself and others, sacrifice and delayed gratification.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 2 personas

adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_webcro768_stickypopup