W. Snyder

Not as good as the first book

Revisado: 04-14-25

The store line in this just was not as good as the first book. It may be OK as the young adult model not so much for an adult. It’s annoying things like referring to the main character in several different ways in some instances creek confusion about what actually is going on or who they’re talking about The storyline just was not amazing maybe better in the future but I’m not paying for another book in the series. I regret paying for this one.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Nothing stood out. It was a hoe Home.

Revisado: 04-08-25

I spent so much time on unimportant characters. The storyline didn’t move very well. You didn’t develop a relationship with the characters. It was pretty uninteresting overall don’t really recommend it.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

It is less of story and more of exposition it does not

Revisado: 12-05-24

I am not a fan of this. It is about exposition and not about story. There’s more where they’re telling us a laundry list of events and not actually incorporating the events into a story. I’m sad. I’m very sad. I’ve loved the series for so very long, but this is really not it Eric Flint God rest his soul had to be really desperate for money to even consider this. It’s terrible writing. There’s no editing. Most of it could be scrapped. It’s straight. it’s obvious the character development is lacking. I don’t know what else I can say about this, but not worth your time.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Solid story great read. Well researched

Revisado: 11-18-24

Great story. Pressfield really writes from the British perspective amazingly well. Throughly enjoyed it. The research is very well done

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Pressfield gets it!

Revisado: 11-10-24

Great premise with many historical parallels. Set it a plausible future. Highly recommend for fans of military fiction and history

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Psychology of Survival. Who lives and how

Revisado: 08-29-24

This is a really excellent work on who lives and who dies and why. It gives a variety of stories, as well as the facts of each case, presented in a very logical and well thought out order. The writing itself is compelling, although this is not a survival how to book this is more of a book. fundamentally, this might not be something that can be taught however, life experiences seem to set certain people up to do better in these adverse scenarios an excellent study on the topic

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Too much filler

Revisado: 03-29-24

While there are indeed some good concepts and overall information the stories and constant name dropping obliterated the points. There is less of investing and too much more of motivating. Tony’s brief narrative is entertaining. The narrative is not. The book feels as if written by a group and not well. I’m hoping the pdf version is more helpful. There are better books out there.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Boring disjointed rambling

Revisado: 02-09-22

This is just Monty rambling on various creatures and wildlife. Anything he says in this you have heard before if you have read anything of his previous work.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 1 persona

Dark angry characters

Revisado: 08-26-21

Good narration poor story. Character actions inconsistent. Obvious bloopers and errors if you’re paying attention. I didn’t like any of the characters in the story.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Very good

Revisado: 01-05-21

Great narration. Excellent story of Churchill’s early life. Cheeky humor and fascinating look at a bygone age.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña