OYENTE

Anónimo

  • 4
  • opiniones
  • 12
  • votos útiles
  • 6
  • calificaciones

Great narrator!

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 10-01-24

Loved the story and the performance. Unique set up. Really enjoyed this one from start to finish.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Did not finish.

Total
3 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
3 out of 5 stars
Historia
3 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 09-17-24

I did not care for the narrator and the plot did not hold my attention.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 3 personas

Not as great as I expected

Total
3 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
3 out of 5 stars
Historia
3 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 07-27-23

I think if I'd read this book, rather than listened to it, I would have enjoyed it more. I didn't care for the narrator. I felt she emphasized passages in all the wrong places and sounded stern at times when she shouldn't have. It almost seemed as if the recording was the first time she'd read it. It was a decent, distracting summer story, but not my favorite.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Not as Golden as I'd Hoped

Total
3 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
4 out of 5 stars
Historia
3 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 12-26-13

Would you say that listening to this book was time well-spent? Why or why not?

This audio book helped me pass the time during four very long road trips. I am grateful to have had the distraction of the story during those drives, but I often found myself talking back to the narrator saying things like, " ok, ok, I get it. Move on already". Obviously, I felt some of the passages we're tedious and long winded. The sheer length of the book could tell you this, but the author could have made her point in three sentences, instead on three paragraphs, many times in the story. Sadly, I felt the main character's best friend, Boris, over-shadowed Theo many times in the book, and their story lines felt oddly competitive and redundant at the same time. The ending was a bit too tidy, and frankly, a bit "preachy" for lack of a better word. I simply can't wrap my head around why the author would lead me to believe that bad guys would suddenly do good things and all would be forgiven. While the intent was clearly to leave the listener/reader with a feel-good ending, this was not a feel good book overall.

What was the most interesting aspect of this story? The least interesting?

The most interesting parts of this book were the sections describing antiques and artwork. Hobie was the best and most intriguing of all the characters, in my opinion. The least interesting part of this book was the entire section in Vegas. It felt forced, redundant, and boring. Boris' storyline started to overshadow Theo and it frustrated me.

What does David Pittu bring to the story that you wouldn’t experience if you just read the book?

I enjoyed Mr Pittu's ability to change character voices. But somehow I felt he too thought Boris was becoming the center of the story.

Do you think The Goldfinch needs a follow-up book? Why or why not?

No! There couldn't possibly be anything more to say.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 6 personas

adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_webcro768_stickypopup