Anónimo

Wonderful reading compensates for minor story editing errors.

Revisado: 04-12-25

Despite a couple places where the editor missed word choice errors the story continues the first class writing. Princeton True Flame is called Prince True blood in one instance and referred to as True Flame in all other places. Anthologist substitutes for anthropology in another instance (this happens once each in Harbinger and Storm Furies. The story deserves a 5 star rating for both the story itself and the reader’s voices.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Sloppy pronunciation of New Mexico place names is somewhat jarring

Revisado: 12-29-24

As with several other books in this series place names including Jemez, Chaco Canyon and another community though not fully anglicized also are not pronounced as I recall from my decade of life traveling and living and extensive travel across most of New Mexico.
I enjoyed the story and my memories as the town we lived in became a ghost town.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

For me this narrative was confusing. Others enjoyed it.

Revisado: 02-05-23

The story line seemed to be one lengthy virtual game or drug haze. I rank the story as 1, my friend ranks it as 4.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Pronunciation differences mar the story

Revisado: 12-01-22

A number of proper names are pronounced differently from how those same names in other books she recorded in this series.
The story is a well written and welcome addition to the series and I look forward to at least a couple more books in this series.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

First book in one of the best fantasy series I have read.

Revisado: 12-08-20

While not without minor flaws the character development and interaction is as well done throughout the series as I have seen anywhere. The only series of comparable quality is the October Daye series. I recommend both highly worth reading, in my case rereading as well.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

lengthy teadious horror story

Revisado: 10-14-20

despite being well written prose i found the pacing slow and was only able to listen to about half before giving up on the slow paced story well chosen title and good artwork definately does not overcome the overall story.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

cliche riddled story.

Revisado: 11-14-18

language tensing to unusually crude. The story barely kept my interest but the ending is ok.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 2 personas

The best book I have read in the past 2 years

Revisado: 11-08-18

I have urged several friends to read this book. Those who have read it also recommend it heartily.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Mediocre story for the entire series

Revisado: 09-02-18

I only read this series as Hugo Finalists. Most of the stories I read are better, I was able to finish reading all of these stories; noteworthy as ocassionally I find stories both among Hugo finalists and in normal reading which contain things which totally break me out from the narrative into my “this doesn’t work at all” mode which starts me into analyzing what’s wrong. There were a couple points in which being a geologist forced me to question why behaviors could be considered possibleNone of the books stood out as being particularly good or bad overall. The second book in this series definitely is the best story of the 3. I did not find the science or science fiction aspect of these stories to be compelling

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 3 personas

Pyroclastic not propolactic don’t know if it’s bad writing bad editing or horrible mispronunciation but fix this now

Revisado: 04-01-18

Overall this is a good story but that one error detracts seriously from both the story and its coherent structure

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña